• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种对食物浪费预防进行环境评估的整体方法。

A holistic approach to the environmental evaluation of food waste prevention.

作者信息

Salemdeeb Ramy, Font Vivanco David, Al-Tabbaa Abir, Zu Ermgassen Erasmus K H J

机构信息

Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.

Center for Industrial Ecology, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, United States.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2017 Jan;59:442-450. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.042. Epub 2016 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.042
PMID:27712945
Abstract

The environmental evaluation of food waste prevention is considered a challenging task due to the globalised nature of the food supply chain and the limitations of existing evaluation tools. The most significant of these is the rebound effect: the associated environmental burdens of substitutive consumption that arises as a result of economic savings made from food waste prevention. This study introduces a holistic approach to addressing these challenges, with a focus on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from household food waste in the UK. It uses a hybrid life-cycle assessment model coupled with a highly detailed multi-regional environmentally extended input output analysis to capture environmental impacts across the global food supply chain. The study also takes into consideration the rebound effect, which was modelled using a linear specification of an almost ideal demand system. The study finds that food waste prevention could lead to substantial reductions in GHG emissions in the order of 706-896kg CO-eq. per tonne of food waste, with most of these savings (78%) occurring as a result of avoided food production overseas. The rebound effect may however reduce such GHG savings by up to 60%. These findings provide a deeper insight into our understanding of the environmental impacts of food waste prevention: the study demonstrates the need to adopt a holistic approach when developing food waste prevention policies in order to mitigate the rebound effect and highlight the importance of increasing efficiency across the global food supply chain, particularly in developing countries.

摘要

由于食品供应链的全球化性质以及现有评估工具的局限性,对食品废弃物预防进行环境评估被视为一项具有挑战性的任务。其中最显著的是反弹效应:即因预防食品废弃物所节省的经济成本而产生的替代性消费相关环境负担。本研究引入了一种整体方法来应对这些挑战,重点关注英国国内家庭食品废弃物的温室气体(GHG)排放。它使用了一个混合生命周期评估模型,并结合高度详细的多区域环境扩展投入产出分析,以捕捉全球食品供应链中的环境影响。该研究还考虑了反弹效应,其通过几乎理想需求系统的线性规范进行建模。研究发现,预防食品废弃物可大幅减少温室气体排放,每吨食品废弃物可减少约706 - 896千克二氧化碳当量,其中大部分减排量(78%)是由于避免了海外食品生产所致。然而,反弹效应可能会使此类温室气体减排量减少多达60%。这些发现为我们对食品废弃物预防的环境影响的理解提供了更深入的见解:该研究表明,在制定食品废弃物预防政策时需要采用整体方法,以减轻反弹效应,并强调提高全球食品供应链效率的重要性,特别是在发展中国家。

相似文献

1
A holistic approach to the environmental evaluation of food waste prevention.一种对食物浪费预防进行环境评估的整体方法。
Waste Manag. 2017 Jan;59:442-450. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.042. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
2
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).减少废弃物产生的全球温室气体排放:政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告的结论与策略。第三工作组(减缓气候变化)
Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433.
3
Recycling of wood for particle board production: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions.木屑板生产用木材的回收:温室气体核算和全球变暖贡献。
Waste Manag Res. 2009 Nov;27(8):781-8. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09349418. Epub 2009 Oct 16.
4
Recycling of glass: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions.玻璃回收:温室气体核算和全球变暖贡献。
Waste Manag Res. 2009 Nov;27(8):754-62. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09342148. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
5
Landfilling of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions.垃圾填埋:温室气体核算和全球变暖贡献。
Waste Manag Res. 2009 Nov;27(8):825-36. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09348529. Epub 2009 Oct 6.
6
Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions.堆肥和堆肥利用:温室气体和全球变暖贡献的核算。
Waste Manag Res. 2009 Nov;27(8):800-12. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09345275. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
7
Recycling of paper: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions.纸张回收:温室气体核算和全球变暖贡献。
Waste Manag Res. 2009 Nov;27(8):746-53. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09348530. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
8
Recycling of plastic: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions.塑料回收:温室气体核算和全球变暖贡献。
Waste Manag Res. 2009 Nov;27(8):763-72. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09345868. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
9
Greenhouse gas emissions during MSW landfilling in China: influence of waste characteristics and LFG treatment measures.中国城市固体废物卫生填埋过程中的温室气体排放:废物特性和 LFG 处理措施的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 15;129:510-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.039. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
10
Recycling of metals: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions.金属回收:温室气体核算和全球变暖贡献。
Waste Manag Res. 2009 Nov;27(8):773-80. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09346838. Epub 2009 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential Energy and Environmental Footprint Savings from Reducing Food Loss and Waste in Europe: A Scenario-Based Multiregional Input-Output Analysis.欧洲减少食物损失和浪费所带来的潜在能源与环境足迹节约:基于情景的多区域投入产出分析
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Oct 31;57(43):16296-16308. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c00158. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
2
Rebound effects could offset more than half of avoided food loss and waste.回弹效应可能会抵消一半以上避免的粮食损失和浪费。
Nat Food. 2023 Jul;4(7):585-595. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00792-z. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
3
No time to waste: assessing the performance of food waste prevention actions.
刻不容缓:评估食物浪费预防行动的成效
Resour Conserv Recycl. 2020 Oct;161:104946. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104946.
4
The role of reducing food waste for resilient food systems.减少食物浪费对韧性粮食系统的作用。
Ecosyst Serv. 2020 Oct;45:101140. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101140. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
5
Assessing the environmental impacts of halving food loss and waste along the food supply chain.评估沿食品供应链减少一半食物损失和浪费对环境的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 10;712:136255. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136255. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
6
A systems approach to assessing environmental and economic effects of food loss and waste interventions in the United States.一种评估美国食物损失和浪费干预措施的环境与经济影响的系统方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Oct 1;685:1240-1254. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.230. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
7
The Environmental Impact and Formation of Meals from the Pilot Year of a Las Vegas Convention Food Rescue Program.拉斯维加斯会议食品救援计划试点年的餐饮的环境影响和形成。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 16;16(10):1718. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101718.
8
Prioritizing and optimizing sustainable measures for food waste prevention and management.优先考虑和优化可持续措施,以预防和管理食物浪费。
Waste Manag. 2018 Feb;72:3-16. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 14.