• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优先考虑和优化可持续措施,以预防和管理食物浪费。

Prioritizing and optimizing sustainable measures for food waste prevention and management.

机构信息

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate D - Sustainable Resources, Bio-economy Unit, Via E. Fermi, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy.

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate D - Sustainable Resources, Bio-economy Unit, Via E. Fermi, 21027 Ispra, VA, Italy.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2018 Feb;72:3-16. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.007
PMID:29150260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5773089/
Abstract

Food waste has gained prominence in the European political debate thanks to the recent Circular Economy package. Currently the waste hierarchy, introduced by the Waste Framework Directive, has been the rule followed to prioritize food waste prevention and management measures according to the environmental criteria. But when considering other criteria along with the environmental one, such as the economic, other tools are needed for the prioritization and optimization. This paper addresses the situation in which a decision-maker has to design a food waste prevention programme considering the limited economic resources in order to achieve the highest environmental impact prevention along the whole food life cycle. A methodology using Life Cycle Assessment and mathematical programing is proposed and its capabilities are shown through a case study. Results show that the order established in the waste hierarchy is generally followed. The proposed methodology revealed to be especially helpful in identifying "quick wins" - measures that should be always prioritized since they avoid a high environmental impact at a low cost. Besides, in order to aggregate the environmental scores related to a variety of impact categories, different weighting sets were proposed. In general, results show that the relevance of the weighting set in the prioritization of the measures appears to be limited. Finally, the correlation between reducing food waste generation and reducing environmental impact along the Food Supply Chain has been studied. Results highlight that when planning food waste prevention strategies, it is important to set the targets at the level of environmental impact instead of setting the targets at the level of avoided food waste generation (in mass).

摘要

由于最近的循环经济一揽子计划,食品浪费在欧洲政治辩论中受到关注。目前,《废物框架指令》所引入的废物层级制度一直是根据环境标准优先考虑预防和管理食物浪费措施的规则。但是,当考虑到与环境标准相关的其他标准,如经济标准时,需要其他工具来进行优先排序和优化。本文针对决策者在考虑有限的经济资源的情况下设计食品浪费预防计划的情况,提出了一种使用生命周期评估和数学规划的方法,并通过案例研究展示了其功能。结果表明,废物层级制度中确立的顺序通常是遵循的。所提出的方法特别有助于确定“速赢措施”,因为这些措施可以以低成本避免高环境影响,因此应该始终优先考虑。此外,为了聚合与多种影响类别相关的环境分数,提出了不同的权重集。一般来说,结果表明,在措施的优先级排序中,权重集的相关性似乎是有限的。最后,研究了减少食物浪费产生和减少食品供应链中环境影响之间的相关性。结果强调,在规划食物浪费预防策略时,将目标设定在环境影响水平而不是设定在避免的食物浪费产生(质量)水平非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/04f06990800b/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/3aadfb6bf0e7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/27e6d9ff7916/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/a2045901c301/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/7d2a31abc646/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/2013884d3ad4/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/5602df6ff891/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/b456fbd5cd16/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/ff6709c3ec2c/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/04f06990800b/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/3aadfb6bf0e7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/27e6d9ff7916/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/a2045901c301/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/7d2a31abc646/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/2013884d3ad4/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/5602df6ff891/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/b456fbd5cd16/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/ff6709c3ec2c/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/047d/5773089/04f06990800b/gr9.jpg

相似文献

1
Prioritizing and optimizing sustainable measures for food waste prevention and management.优先考虑和优化可持续措施,以预防和管理食物浪费。
Waste Manag. 2018 Feb;72:3-16. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
2
Environmental Sustainability of Hospital Foodservices across the Food Supply Chain: A Systematic Review.医院餐饮服务在整个食品供应链中的环境可持续性:系统评价。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 May;120(5):825-873. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
3
Towards more sustainable management of European food waste: Methodological approach and numerical application.迈向欧洲食物垃圾更可持续的管理:方法学途径与数值应用。
Waste Manag Res. 2016 Sep;34(9):957-68. doi: 10.1177/0734242X16652965. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
4
Energy and environmental life cycle assessment of an institutional catering service: An Italian case study.机构餐饮服务的能源和环境生命周期评估:意大利案例研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 20;657:1150-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.131. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
5
Towards transparent valorization of food surplus, waste and loss: Clarifying definitions, food waste hierarchy, and role in the circular economy.迈向食品过剩、浪费和损失的透明增值:定义、食品浪费层次结构和在循环经济中的作用的澄清。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 1;706:136033. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136033. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
6
Wasted Food, Wasted Resources? A Critical Review of Environmental Impact Analysis of Food Loss and Waste Generation and Treatment.浪费的食物,浪费的资源?对食物损失和浪费产生及处理的环境影响分析的批判性回顾。
Environ Sci Technol. 2024 Apr 30;58(17):7240-7255. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c08426. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
7
A focus on the state of the art of food waste/losses issue and suggestions for future researches.关注食品浪费/损耗问题的最新状况及对未来研究的建议。
Waste Manag. 2017 Oct;68:557-570. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.047. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management.美国材料与废物管理决策支持工具的应用。
Waste Manag. 2007;27(8):1006-20. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.024. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
9
Combined application of Life Cycle Assessment and linear programming to evaluate food waste-to-food strategies: Seeking for answers in the nexus approach.生命周期评价与线性规划在评估食物垃圾转化食物策略中的联合应用:在关联方法中寻求答案。
Waste Manag. 2018 Oct;80:186-197. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
10
Sewage sludge disposal strategies for sustainable development.可持续发展的污水污泥处置策略。
Environ Res. 2017 Jul;156:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on sustainable agri-food system and agroecosystem decarbonization nexus: A review.了解新冠疫情对可持续农业食品系统与农业生态系统脱碳关系的影响:一项综述
J Clean Prod. 2021 Oct 10;318:128451. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128451. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
2
Biodiversity effects of food system sustainability actions from farm to fork.从农场到餐桌的食物系统可持续性行动对生物多样性的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 12;119(15):e2113884119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113884119. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
3
Sustainable waste management solutions for the foodservice industry: A Delphi study.

本文引用的文献

1
Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options.将食物垃圾用作动物饲料对环境和健康的影响:食物垃圾管理选项的比较分析
J Clean Prod. 2017 Jan 1;140:871-880. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.049.
2
A holistic approach to the environmental evaluation of food waste prevention.一种对食物浪费预防进行环境评估的整体方法。
Waste Manag. 2017 Jan;59:442-450. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.042. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
3
Assessment of Food Waste Prevention and Recycling Strategies Using a Multilayer Systems Approach.
食品服务业可持续废物管理解决方案:一项德尔菲研究。
Waste Manag Res. 2022 Sep;40(9):1412-1423. doi: 10.1177/0734242X221079306. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
4
Regionalized Strategies for Food Loss and Waste Management in Spain under a Life Cycle Thinking Approach.生命周期思维方法下西班牙食物损失与浪费管理的区域化策略
Foods. 2020 Nov 28;9(12):1765. doi: 10.3390/foods9121765.
5
Waste not, want not: A bio-economic impact assessment of household food waste reductions in the EU.不浪费,不匮乏:欧盟家庭食物浪费减少的生物经济影响评估
Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019 Jul;146:514-522. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.016.
采用多层系统方法评估食物浪费预防和回收策略。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Dec 15;49(24):13937-45. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03781. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
4
Analysis of waste hierarchy in the European waste directive 2008/98/EC.《欧洲废物指令2008/98/EC》中的废物分级分析
Waste Manag. 2015 May;39:305-13. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
5
The extent of food waste generation across EU-27: different calculation methods and the reliability of their results.欧盟27国食物浪费产生的程度:不同的计算方法及其结果的可靠性。
Waste Manag Res. 2014 Aug;32(8):683-94. doi: 10.1177/0734242X14545374.
6
Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part II: methodological guidance for a better practice.固体废弃物管理系统生命周期评价研究述评——第二部分:更好实践的方法学指导。
Waste Manag. 2014 Mar;34(3):589-606. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.004. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
7
Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part I: lessons learned and perspectives.固体废物管理系统生命周期评价研究综述——第一部分:经验教训和展望。
Waste Manag. 2014 Mar;34(3):573-88. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.045. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
8
Environmental evaluation of municipal waste prevention.城市废物预防的环境评估。
Waste Manag. 2011 Dec;31(12):2371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.07.030. Epub 2011 Sep 15.