Kadota Kyuichi, Sima Camelia S, Arcila Maria E, Hedvat Cyrus, Kris Mark G, Jones David R, Adusumilli Prasad S, Travis William D
*Department of Surgery, Thoracic Service †Department of Pathology §Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics ∥Department of Medicine, Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology ¶Center for Cell Engineering, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY ‡Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Dec;40(12):1579-1590. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000744.
The potential clinical impact of KRAS and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has been investigated in lung adenocarcinomas; however, their prognostic value remains controversial. In our study, we sought to investigate the prognostic significance of driver mutations using a large cohort of early-stage lung adenocarcinomas. We reviewed patients with pathologic early-stage, lymph node-negative, solitary lung adenocarcinoma who had undergone surgical resection (1995 to 2005; stage I/II=463/19). Tumors were classified according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification and genotyped by Sequenom MassARRAY system and polymerase chain reaction-based assays. In stage I disease, the Kaplan-Meier method and cumulative incidence of recurrence analyses were used to estimate the probability of overall survival (OS) and recurrence, respectively. Of all, 129 (27%) patients had mutations in KRAS, 86 (18%) in EGFR, 8 (2%) in BRAF, 8 (2%) in PIK3CA, 4 (1%) in NRAS, and 1 (0.2%) in AKT1. EGFR L858R mutation correlated with lepidic predominant histology (P=0.006), whereas exon 19 deletion correlated with acinar predominant histology (P<0.001). EGFR mutations were not detected in invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas (P=0.033). The 5-year OS of patients with KRAS-mutant tumors was significantly worse (n=124; 5-year OS, 63%) than those with KRAS wild-type (n=339; 77%; P<0.001). In solid predominant tumors, KRAS mutations correlated with worse OS (P=0.008) and increased risk of recurrence (P=0.005). On multivariate analysis, KRAS mutation was an independent prognosticator of OS in all patients (hazard ratio, 1.87; P<0.001) and recurrence in solid predominant tumors (hazard ratio, 4.73; P=0.012). In patients with resected stage I lung adenocarcinomas, KRAS mutation was an independent prognostic factor for OS and recurrence, especially in solid predominant tumors.
KRAS和表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变在肺腺癌中的潜在临床影响已得到研究;然而,它们的预后价值仍存在争议。在我们的研究中,我们试图使用一大群早期肺腺癌患者来研究驱动基因突变的预后意义。我们回顾了接受手术切除的病理早期、淋巴结阴性、孤立性肺腺癌患者(1995年至2005年;I/II期=463/19)。肿瘤根据国际肺癌研究协会(IASLC)/美国胸科学会(ATS)/欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)分类进行分类,并通过Sequenom MassARRAY系统和基于聚合酶链反应的检测方法进行基因分型。在I期疾病中,采用Kaplan-Meier方法和复发累积发生率分析分别估计总生存期(OS)和复发概率。其中,129例(27%)患者KRAS基因突变,86例(18%)EGFR基因突变,8例(2%)BRAF基因突变,8例(2%)PIK3CA基因突变,4例(1%)NRAS基因突变,1例(0.2%)AKT1基因突变。EGFR L858R突变与鳞屑状为主的组织学类型相关(P=0.006),而19外显子缺失与腺泡状为主的组织学类型相关(P<0.001)。浸润性黏液腺癌中未检测到EGFR突变(P=0.033)。KRAS基因突变肿瘤患者的5年总生存期(n=124;5年总生存期,63%)明显低于KRAS野生型患者(n=339;77%;P<0.001)。在实性为主的肿瘤中,KRAS突变与较差的总生存期(P=0.008)和复发风险增加相关(P=0.005)。多因素分析显示,KRAS突变是所有患者总生存期(风险比,1.87;P<0.001)和实性为主肿瘤复发(风险比,4.73;P=0.012)的独立预后因素。在接受手术切除的I期肺腺癌患者中,KRAS突变是总生存期和复发的独立预后因素,尤其是在实性为主的肿瘤中。