Suppr超能文献

不丹医疗保健专业人员的药品不良反应报告知识:一项横断面调查

Knowledge of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Among Healthcare Professionals in Bhutan: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

作者信息

Dorji Choki, Tragulpiankit Pramote, Riewpaiboon Arthorn, Tobgay Tashi

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, 447 Sri-Ayudhaya Road, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.

Drug Regulatory Authority, Thimphu, Bhutan.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2016 Dec;39(12):1239-1250. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0465-2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Bhutan National Pharmacovigilance Centre (NPC) became an official member of the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring in December 2014; however, the number of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported is very low (50 reports per 773,722 inhabitants over 10 years). Surveys of healthcare professionals (HCPs) in similar countries have indicated that adequate knowledge of both ADRs and ADR reporting is likely to increase the number of ADR reports submitted.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the level of knowledge of both ADRs and ADR reporting among HCPs, including traditional medicine practitioners.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted, using a validated self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaires were distributed to 670 HCPs, including clinical doctors, nurses, pharmacists and traditional medicine practitioners from four referral hospitals. The survey consisted of 12 questions pertaining to ADRs and 10 questions pertaining to knowledge of ADR reporting. The collected response was then analysed descriptively and results presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) using SPSS version 20.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 434 (65 %) questionnaires, with HCPs consisting of clinical doctors (94, 22 %), nurses (257, 59 %), pharmacists (52, 12 %) and traditional medicine practitioners (31, 7 %). The overall mean ± SD score with regard to the level of knowledge of ADRs was 6.52 ± 2.81 out of a maximum score of 12, among which clinical doctors scored 7.48 ± 2.95, nurses 6.15 ± 2.47, pharmacists 8.15 ± 2.49 and traditional medicine practitioners 4.13 ± 3.18. The mean ± SD score with regard to the level of knowledge of ADR reporting among HCPs was 3.94 ± 1.89 out of a maximum score of 10, among which clinical doctors scored 3.93 ± 1.81, nurses 3.75 ± 1.74, pharmacists 5.00 ± 1.81 and traditional medicine practitioners 4.00 ± 1.77.

CONCLUSION

Clinical doctors and pharmacists have better knowledge of ADRs than nurses and traditional medicine practitioners, while knowledge of ADR reporting was low for all HCPs surveyed.

摘要

引言

不丹国家药物警戒中心(NPC)于2014年12月成为世界卫生组织国际药品监测计划的正式成员;然而,上报的药品不良反应(ADR)数量非常少(10年间每773,722名居民中有50份报告)。对类似国家的医疗保健专业人员(HCP)进行的调查表明,对ADR和ADR报告有充分了解可能会增加提交的ADR报告数量。

目的

本研究的目的是调查包括传统医学从业者在内的HCP对ADR和ADR报告的了解程度。

方法

采用经过验证的自填式问卷进行横断面调查。问卷分发给670名HCP,包括来自四家转诊医院的临床医生、护士、药剂师和传统医学从业者。该调查包括12个与ADR相关的问题和10个与ADR报告知识相关的问题。然后对收集到的回答进行描述性分析,并使用SPSS 20版将结果表示为平均值±标准差(SD)。

结果

总体回复率为434份问卷(65%),HCP包括临床医生(94名,22%)、护士(257名,59%)、药剂师(52名,12%)和传统医学从业者(31名,7%)。在满分12分中,ADR知识水平的总体平均±SD得分为6.52±2.81,其中临床医生得分为7.48±2.95,护士为6.15±2.47,药剂师为8.15±2.49,传统医学从业者为4.13±3.18。在满分10分中,HCP中ADR报告知识水平的平均±SD得分为3.94±1.89,其中临床医生得分为3.93±1.81,护士为3.75±1.74,药剂师为5.00±1.81,传统医学从业者为4.00±1.77。

结论

临床医生和药剂师对ADR的了解比护士和传统医学从业者更好,而所有接受调查的HCP对ADR报告的了解程度都较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验