Mehta Amitoj S, Evans Carla A, Viana Grace, Bedran-Russo Ana, Galang-Boquiren Maria Therese S
Department of Orthodontics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5762785. doi: 10.1155/2016/5762785. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
This study evaluates tensile bond strength (TBS) of metal orthodontic attachments to sandblasted feldspathic porcelain and zirconia with various bonding protocols. Thirty-six (36) feldspathic and 36 zirconia disc samples were prepared, glazed, embedded in acrylic blocks and sandblasted, and divided into three groups according to one or more of the following treatments: hydrofluoric acid 4% (HF), Porcelain Conditioner silane primer, Reliance Assure® primer, Reliance Assure plus® primer, and Z Prime™ plus zirconia primer. A round traction hook was bonded to each sample. Static tensile bond strength tests were performed in a universal testing machine and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scoring was done using a digital camera. One-way ANOVA and Pearson chi-square tests were used to analyze TBS (MPa) and ARI scores. No statistically significant mean differences were found in TBS among the different bonding protocols for feldspathic and zirconia, values = 0.369 and 0.944, respectively. No statistically significant distribution of ARI scores was found among the levels of feldspathic, value = 0.569. However, statistically significant distribution of ARI scores was found among the levels of zirconia, value = 0.026. The study concluded that silanization following sandblasting resulted in tensile bond strengths comparable to other bonding protocols for feldspathic and zirconia surface.
本研究评估了采用不同粘结方案时,金属正畸附件与喷砂处理的长石质瓷和氧化锆之间的拉伸粘结强度(TBS)。制备了36个长石质瓷圆盘样品和36个氧化锆圆盘样品,进行上釉处理,嵌入丙烯酸树脂块中并进行喷砂处理,然后根据以下一种或多种处理方法分为三组:4%氢氟酸(HF)、瓷用处理剂硅烷底漆、信赖安舒尔®底漆、信赖安舒尔加强型®底漆和Z Prime™ plus氧化锆底漆。在每个样品上粘结一个圆形牵引钩。在万能试验机上进行静态拉伸粘结强度测试,并使用数码相机进行粘结剂残留指数(ARI)评分。采用单因素方差分析和Pearson卡方检验分析TBS(MPa)和ARI评分。对于长石质瓷和氧化锆,不同粘结方案之间的TBS未发现统计学上的显著平均差异,p值分别为0.369和0.944。在长石质瓷的不同水平之间,未发现ARI评分的统计学显著分布,p值 = 0.569。然而,在氧化锆的不同水平之间发现了ARI评分的统计学显著分布,p值 = 0.026。该研究得出结论,喷砂处理后进行硅烷化处理所获得的拉伸粘结强度与长石质瓷和氧化锆表面的其他粘结方案相当。