Fraser Rogan G, Tan Rose, Ayton Lauren N, Caruso Emily, Guymer Robyn H, Luu Chi D
Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgery (Ophthalmology), The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 1;57(13):5436-5442. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19295.
We determine the feasibility of using a dark-adapted chromatic (DAC) perimeter to obtain dark-adapted static and dynamic rod function at multiple retinal locations, and compare these functional parameters between subjects with intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and normal controls.
Perimetric dark-adapted retinal sensitivities for the 505 and 620 nm stimuli across 7 retinal locations within the central 12° were repeatedly measured after exposing to a single photobleach in 22 intermediate AMD subjects and 8 controls. The sensitivities for each stimulus at 20 minutes after bleach and the sensitivity difference between the stimuli were used to determine static rod function. Sensitivities for the 505 nm stimulus at various times within the initial 20 minutes after bleach were used to estimate the rod criterion time to determine rod function dynamics. The static and dynamic rod functional parameters were compared between AMD and control eyes.
Compared to the control eyes, AMD eyes had a reduction in retinal sensitivities for the 505 nm (P < 0.001) and 620 nm (P < 0.001) stimuli, a reduction in sensitivity difference (P < 0.001), and an increased in rod criterion time (P < 0.001). Region within the central 6° appeared to be the most defective and AMD eyes with reticular pseudodrusen (RPD) seemed to have worse function than eyes without RPD.
It is feasible to use a DAC perimeter to study dark-adapted static and dynamic rod-mediated function at multiple retinal loci. Static and dynamic rod function were abnormal in intermediate AMD and more so in eyes with RPD, particularly within the central 6° retina.
我们确定使用暗适应色度(DAC)视野计在多个视网膜位置获取暗适应静态和动态视杆功能的可行性,并比较中度年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者与正常对照者之间的这些功能参数。
在22名中度AMD患者和8名对照者单次光漂白后,反复测量中央12°范围内7个视网膜位置对505和620 nm刺激的视野计暗适应视网膜敏感度。漂白后20分钟时每个刺激的敏感度以及刺激之间的敏感度差异用于确定静态视杆功能。漂白后最初20分钟内不同时间对505 nm刺激的敏感度用于估计视杆标准时间以确定视杆功能动态。比较AMD和对照眼的静态和动态视杆功能参数。
与对照眼相比,AMD眼对505 nm(P < 0.001)和620 nm(P < 0.001)刺激的视网膜敏感度降低,敏感度差异降低(P < 0.001),视杆标准时间增加(P < 0.001)。中央6°范围内的区域似乎缺陷最明显,有网状假性玻璃膜疣(RPD)的AMD眼似乎比没有RPD的眼功能更差。
使用DAC视野计研究多个视网膜位点的暗适应静态和动态视杆介导功能是可行的。中度AMD患者的静态和动态视杆功能异常,有RPD的眼更明显,尤其是在中央6°视网膜内。