Brommesson Peter, Wennergren Uno, Lindström Tom
Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 19;11(10):e0164008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164008. eCollection 2016.
The structure of contacts that mediate transmission has a pronounced effect on the outbreak dynamics of infectious disease and simulation models are powerful tools to inform policy decisions. Most simulation models of livestock disease spread rely to some degree on predictions of animal movement between holdings. Typically, movements are more common between nearby farms than between those located far away from each other. Here, we assessed spatiotemporal variation in such distance dependence of animal movement contacts from an epidemiological perspective. We evaluated and compared nine statistical models, applied to Swedish movement data from 2008. The models differed in at what level (if at all), they accounted for regional and/or seasonal heterogeneities in the distance dependence of the contacts. Using a kernel approach to describe how probability of contacts between farms changes with distance, we developed a hierarchical Bayesian framework and estimated parameters by using Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. We evaluated models by three different approaches of model selection. First, we used Deviance Information Criterion to evaluate their performance relative to each other. Secondly, we estimated the log predictive posterior distribution, this was also used to evaluate their relative performance. Thirdly, we performed posterior predictive checks by simulating movements with each of the parameterized models and evaluated their ability to recapture relevant summary statistics. Independent of selection criteria, we found that accounting for regional heterogeneity improved model accuracy. We also found that accounting for seasonal heterogeneity was beneficial, in terms of model accuracy, according to two of three methods used for model selection. Our results have important implications for livestock disease spread models where movement is an important risk factor for between farm transmission. We argue that modelers should refrain from using methods to simulate animal movements that assume the same pattern across all regions and seasons without explicitly testing for spatiotemporal variation.
介导传播的接触结构对传染病的暴发动态有着显著影响,而模拟模型是为政策决策提供信息的有力工具。大多数家畜疾病传播的模拟模型在一定程度上依赖于对养殖场之间动物移动的预测。通常,附近农场之间的移动比相距遥远的农场之间更为常见。在此,我们从流行病学角度评估了动物移动接触中这种距离依赖性的时空变化。我们评估并比较了九个统计模型,这些模型应用于2008年瑞典的移动数据。这些模型在对接触距离依赖性中的区域和/或季节异质性进行考量的水平(若有考量的话)上存在差异。我们采用核函数方法来描述农场间接触概率如何随距离变化,开发了一个层次贝叶斯框架,并使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗技术估计参数。我们通过三种不同的模型选择方法对模型进行评估。首先,我们使用离差信息准则来评估它们彼此之间的性能。其次,我们估计对数预测后验分布,这也用于评估它们的相对性能。第三,我们通过用每个参数化模型模拟移动来进行后验预测检验,并评估它们重新获取相关汇总统计量的能力。无论选择标准如何,我们发现考虑区域异质性可提高模型准确性。我们还发现,根据用于模型选择的三种方法中的两种,考虑季节异质性在模型准确性方面是有益的。我们的结果对家畜疾病传播模型具有重要意义,在这些模型中,移动是农场间传播的一个重要风险因素。我们认为,建模者应避免使用假设所有区域和季节都具有相同模式而未明确检验时空变化的方法来模拟动物移动。