Brussee Tamara, van Nispen Ruth Ma, van Rens Ger Hmb
Department of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Exp Optom. 2017 May;100(3):270-277. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12482. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
Visual acuity (VA) only slightly explains variability in reading performance, whereas other visual and non-visual parameters have been reported to influence reading performance; however, in ophthalmologic and optometric clinical practice and research, where standardised reading tests are used, many of these parameters are often neglected. The purpose of this study was to give insight into how various visual and non-visual parameters are associated with reading performance in normally sighted subjects. In addition, reading speed over time was investigated to observe the influence of prolonged reading on standardised test performance.
Reading speed and the number of mistakes were assessed with long text paragraphs obtained from the International Reading Speed Texts (IReST) and short sentences obtained from the Radner Reading Charts in 71 persons (mean age: 55 years, range: 18 to 86 years) with a binocular distance VA of logMAR 0.20 or better. For each of the variables (distance and near VA, contrast sensitivity, stray light, age, sex, educational level, habitual reading hours and reading affinity), the association with reading performance was investigated with multivariate linear regression models. Reading performance over time was assessed with linear mixed models.
Contrast sensitivity was independently associated with reading speed (IReST paragraphs p = 0.002, Radner sentences p = 0.021). An interaction between age and education was found for both reading tests (p = 0.001), at an older age, reading speed was less influenced by educational level. Reading speed remained stable over time.
The present study shows that contrast sensitivity was independently associated with reading speed and an interaction effect was found between age and education. As these tests are easy to administer, it is recommended to assess them in clinical practice and scientific research. When using standardised tests in healthy subjects, prolonged reading proved not to be an issue for reading durations up to about 23 minutes.
视力(VA)对阅读表现变异性的解释作用微弱,而据报道其他视觉和非视觉参数会影响阅读表现;然而,在眼科和验光临床实践及研究中,使用标准化阅读测试时,其中许多参数常常被忽视。本研究的目的是深入了解各种视觉和非视觉参数与视力正常受试者阅读表现之间的关联。此外,还对阅读速度随时间的变化进行了研究,以观察长时间阅读对标准化测试表现的影响。
使用从国际阅读速度文本(IReST)获取的长文本段落以及从拉德纳阅读图表获取的短句,对71名双眼远视力logMAR为0.20或更好(平均年龄:55岁,范围:18至86岁)的受试者的阅读速度和错误数量进行评估。对于每个变量(远视力和近视力、对比敏感度、杂散光、年龄、性别、教育水平、习惯阅读时间和阅读亲和力),使用多元线性回归模型研究其与阅读表现的关联。使用线性混合模型评估随时间的阅读表现。
对比敏感度与阅读速度独立相关(IReST段落p = 0.002,拉德纳句子p = 0.021)。两项阅读测试均发现年龄与教育之间存在交互作用(p = 0.001),在年龄较大时,阅读速度受教育水平的影响较小。阅读速度随时间保持稳定。
本研究表明,对比敏感度与阅读速度独立相关,且发现年龄与教育之间存在交互作用。由于这些测试易于实施,建议在临床实践和科学研究中对其进行评估。在健康受试者中使用标准化测试时,长达约23分钟的阅读时间证明长时间阅读不是问题。