Suppr超能文献

使用旋转和往复式单根管系统进行根管预备后的碎屑评估

Debris Evaluation after Root Canal Shaping with Rotating and Reciprocating Single-File Systems.

作者信息

Dagna Alberto, Gastaldo Giulia, Beltrami Riccardo, Poggio Claudio

机构信息

Department of Clinical Surgical Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, Section of Dentistry, University of Pavia, Piazzale Golgi 3, Pavia 27100, Italy.

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Piazzale Golgi 3, Pavia 27100, Italy.

出版信息

J Funct Biomater. 2016 Oct 17;7(4):28. doi: 10.3390/jfb7040028.

Abstract

This study evaluated the root canal dentine surface by scanning electron microscope (SEM) after shaping with two reciprocating single-file NiTi systems and two rotating single-file NiTi systems, in order to verify the presence/absence of the smear layer and the presence/absence of open tubules along the walls of each sample; Forty-eight single-rooted teeth were divided into four groups and shaped with OneShape (OS), F6 SkyTaper (F6), WaveOne (WO) and Reciproc and irrigated using 5.25% NaOCl and 17% EDTA. Root canal walls were analyzed by SEM at a standard magnification of 2500×. The presence/absence of the smear layer and the presence/absence of open tubules at the coronal, middle, and apical third of each canal were estimated using a five-step scale for scores. Numeric data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U statistical tests and significance was predetermined at < 0.05; The Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA for debris score showed significant differences among the NiTi systems ( < 0.05). The Mann-Whitney test confirmed that reciprocating systems presented significantly higher score values than rotating files. The same results were assessed considering the smear layer scores. ANOVA confirmed that the apical third of the canal maintained a higher quantity of debris and smear layer after preparation of all the samples; Single-use NiTi systems used in continuous rotation appeared to be more effective than reciprocating instruments in leaving clean walls. The reciprocating systems produced more debris and smear layer than rotating instruments.

摘要

本研究通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估了使用两种往复式单根镍钛系统和两种旋转式单根镍钛系统进行根管预备后根管牙本质表面的情况,以验证每个样本管壁上玷污层的有无以及开放牙本质小管的有无;将48颗单根牙分为四组,分别用OneShape(OS)、F6 SkyTaper(F6)、WaveOne(WO)和Reciproc进行根管预备,并使用5.25%次氯酸钠和17%乙二胺四乙酸进行冲洗。通过SEM在2500倍标准放大倍数下分析根管壁。使用五步评分量表评估每个根管冠部、中部和根尖三分之一处玷污层的有无以及开放牙本质小管的有无。使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U统计检验分析数值数据,显著性预先设定为<0.05;Kruskal-Wallis方差分析显示镍钛系统之间在碎屑评分上存在显著差异(<0.05)。Mann-Whitney检验证实,往复式系统的评分值显著高于旋转锉。考虑玷污层评分时评估得到相同结果。方差分析证实,在所有样本预备后,根管根尖三分之一处残留的碎屑和玷污层数量更多;连续旋转使用的一次性镍钛系统在使管壁清洁方面似乎比往复式器械更有效。往复式系统比旋转器械产生更多的碎屑和玷污层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c93f/5197987/c78ad3fc1ea6/jfb-07-00028-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验