Chuang Emmeline, Brunner Julian, Moody Jamie, Ibarra Leticia, Hoyt Helina, McKenzie Thomas L, Binggeli-Vallarta Amy, Cervantes Griselda, Finlayson Tracy L, Ayala Guadalupe X
Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles E. Young Dr South, Los Angeles, California 90095-1772. Email:
Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Oct 20;13:E147. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160238.
Ecological approaches to health behavior change require effective engagement from and coordination of activities among diverse community stakeholders. We identified facilitators of and barriers to implementation experienced by project leaders and key stakeholders involved in the Imperial County, California, Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration project, a multilevel, multisector intervention to prevent and control childhood obesity.
A total of 74 semistructured interviews were conducted with project leaders (n = 6) and key stakeholders (n = 68) representing multiple levels of influence in the health care, early care and education, and school sectors. Interviews, informed by the Multilevel Implementation Framework, were conducted in 2013, approximately 12 months after year-one project implementation, and were transcribed, coded, and summarized.
Respondents emphasized the importance of engaging parents and of ensuring support from senior leaders of participating organizations. In schools, obtaining teacher buy-in was described as particularly important, given lower perceived compatibility of the intervention with organizational priorities. From a program planning perspective, key facilitators of implementation in all 3 sectors included taking a participatory approach to the development of program materials, gradually introducing intervention activities, and minimizing staff burden. Barriers to implementation were staff turnover, limited local control over food provided by external vendors or school district policies, and limited availability of supportive resources within the broader community.
Project leaders and stakeholders in all sectors reported similar facilitators of and barriers to implementation, suggesting the possibility for synergy in intervention planning efforts.
健康行为改变的生态方法需要不同社区利益相关者的有效参与和活动协调。我们确定了参与加利福尼亚州帝国县儿童肥胖研究示范项目的项目负责人和关键利益相关者所经历的实施促进因素和障碍,该项目是一项预防和控制儿童肥胖的多层次、多部门干预措施。
对项目负责人(n = 6)和关键利益相关者(n = 68)进行了总共74次半结构化访谈,这些利益相关者代表了医疗保健、早期护理和教育以及学校部门的多个影响层面。访谈以多层次实施框架为指导,于2013年进行,即在项目实施一年后约12个月,访谈内容进行了转录、编码和总结。
受访者强调了让家长参与以及确保参与组织的高级领导提供支持的重要性。在学校,鉴于干预措施与组织优先事项的兼容性较低,获得教师的认可被认为尤为重要。从项目规划的角度来看,所有三个部门实施的关键促进因素包括采用参与式方法开发项目材料、逐步引入干预活动以及减轻工作人员负担。实施障碍包括人员流动、对外部供应商提供的食品或学区政策的地方控制有限以及更广泛社区内支持资源的可用性有限。
所有部门的项目负责人和利益相关者报告了类似的实施促进因素和障碍,这表明在干预规划工作中存在协同增效的可能性。