Suppr超能文献

米替福新治疗实体器官移植受者持续性或复发性内脏利什曼病的经验:来自西班牙的病例系列

Experience with miltefosine for persistent or relapsing visceral leishmaniasis in solid organ transplant recipients: A case series from Spain.

作者信息

Pérez-Jacoiste Asín Maria A, Carrasco-Antón Nerea, Fernández-Ruiz Mario, San Juan Rafael, Alonso-Moralejo Rodrigo, González Esther, Andrés Amado, López-Medrano Francisco, Aguado Jose M

机构信息

Unit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre" (i+12), School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario "12 de Octubre", Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre" (i+12), School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Transpl Infect Dis. 2017 Feb;19(1). doi: 10.1111/tid.12623. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

Abstract

The incidence of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) after solid organ transplantation (SOT) is increasing. The optimal therapy for post-transplant VL remains unclear, as relapses after liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) are common. Miltefosine has been shown to be effective for treating VL in immunocompetent patients, although data in the specific population of SOT recipients are lacking. In the setting of an outbreak of leishmaniasis occurring in Southwest Madrid, we reviewed our experience in 6 SOT recipients with persistent or relapsing VL who received a 28-day course of miltefosine (2.5 mg/kg/day) as salvage therapy. All patients had been treated previously with L-AmB as first-line therapy. The incident episode of VL occurred at a median of 14 months after transplantation. Two patients experienced persistent infection and the remaining 4 had a relapse after a median interval of 168 days since the completion of the course of L-AmB. All the patients had an apparent initial clinical improvement with miltefosine. However, VL relapsed in 3 of them (after a median interval of 46 days), which required retreatment with L-AmB-based regimens. Miltefosine therapy was followed by a prolonged secondary prophylaxis with L-AmB in the only 2 cases with sustained clinical response and ongoing immunosuppression. No adverse effects associated with miltefosine were observed. Albeit limited, our experience suggests that miltefosine monotherapy likely has a limited utility to obtain a long-lasting clinical response in complicated (persistent or relapsing) forms of post-transplant VL, although its role in association with L-AmB-based secondary prophylaxis may merit further investigation.

摘要

实体器官移植(SOT)后内脏利什曼病(VL)的发病率正在上升。移植后VL的最佳治疗方法仍不明确,因为脂质体两性霉素B(L-AmB)治疗后复发很常见。米替福新已被证明对免疫功能正常的患者治疗VL有效,尽管缺乏SOT受者这一特定人群的数据。在马德里西南部发生利什曼病疫情的背景下,我们回顾了6例SOT受者接受米替福新(2.5mg/kg/天)28天疗程作为挽救治疗的持续性或复发性VL的经验。所有患者此前均接受过L-AmB作为一线治疗。VL发病事件发生在移植后的中位时间为14个月。2例患者出现持续性感染,其余4例在完成L-AmB疗程后的中位间隔168天后复发。所有患者使用米替福新后最初临床症状均有明显改善。然而,其中3例(中位间隔46天后)VL复发,需要用基于L-AmB的方案重新治疗。在仅有的2例临床反应持续且持续免疫抑制的病例中,米替福新治疗后接着用L-AmB进行了长时间的二级预防。未观察到与米替福新相关的不良反应。尽管我们的经验有限,但表明米替福新单药治疗在获得移植后VL复杂(持续或复发)形式的持久临床反应方面可能效用有限,尽管其与基于L-AmB的二级预防联合使用的作用可能值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验