Suppr超能文献

脂质体两性霉素 B(Fungisome)联合短程米替福新与米替福新单药治疗印度内脏利什曼病的疗效比较。

Combination Therapy Against Indian Visceral Leishmaniasis with Liposomal Amphotericin B (Fungisome) and Short-Course Miltefosine in Comparison to Miltefosine Monotherapy.

机构信息

1Department of Tropical Medicine, School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, India.

2Department of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, India.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Jul;103(1):308-314. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0931. Epub 2020 May 7.

Abstract

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is endemic in Asia, East and North Africa, South America, and Southern Europe, and is a major public health problem in the Indian subcontinent. Miltefosine received approval in 2002 to treat VL in India, and the Indian National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme later adopted a single dose (10 mg/kg) of liposomal amphotericin B. We report results of a randomized trial comparing the efficacy of combination therapy with an Indian preparation of liposomal amphotericin B (single dose of 7.5 mg/kg) and short-course miltefosine (2.5 mg/kg/day for 14 days; = 66) in comparison to miltefosine monotherapy (2.5 mg/kg/day for 28 days; = 78). Nine patients in the miltefosine group and three in the combination therapy group had to discontinue therapy because of serious adverse events. At the end of the therapy, the clinical and parasitological cure rate was 100% in both groups. By per-protocol analysis, by 6 months after completion of treatment, 12 of 69 patients in the miltefosine monotherapy arm (17.4%, 95% CI: 10.24-28%) and none in the combination therapy arm had relapse. Over 5 years of follow-up, 10 patients in the miltefosine monotherapy arm (all within 0.5-2 years after completing therapy) and none in the combination therapy arm experienced post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis. Combination therapy offered benefits over miltefosine monotherapy for VL in India.

摘要

内脏利什曼病(VL)在亚洲、东非和北非、南美洲和南欧流行,是印度次大陆的一个主要公共卫生问题。米替福新于 2002 年获准在印度治疗 VL,印度国家病媒传播疾病控制计划随后采用了单剂量(10mg/kg)脂质体两性霉素 B。我们报告了一项随机试验的结果,该试验比较了联合治疗与印度脂质体两性霉素 B(单剂量 7.5mg/kg)和短程米替福新(2.5mg/kg/天,共 14 天; = 66)与米替福新单药治疗(2.5mg/kg/天,共 28 天; = 78)的疗效。米替福新组的 9 例和联合治疗组的 3 例患者因严重不良事件而不得不停止治疗。在治疗结束时,两组的临床和寄生虫学治愈率均为 100%。根据方案分析,在完成治疗后 6 个月时,米替福新单药治疗组的 69 例患者中有 12 例(17.4%,95%CI:10.24-28%)和联合治疗组无一例复发。在 5 年的随访中,米替福新单药治疗组的 10 例患者(均在完成治疗后 0.5-2 年内)和联合治疗组无一例患者发生黑热病后皮肤利什曼病。联合治疗为印度的 VL 提供了优于米替福新单药治疗的优势。

相似文献

7
Oral miltefosine for Indian visceral leishmaniasis.口服米替福新治疗印度内脏利什曼病。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 28;347(22):1739-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021556.

引用本文的文献

2
Progress in antileishmanial drugs: Mechanisms, challenges, and prospects.抗利什曼原虫药物的进展:作用机制、挑战与前景
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Jan 3;19(1):e0012735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012735. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
anti- activity of triclabendazole and its synergic effect with amphotericin B.三氯苯达唑的抗活性及其与两性霉素 B 的协同作用。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jan 9;12:1044665. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1044665. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

9
Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis developing in miltefosine-treated visceral leishmaniasis.
Indian J Dermatol. 2013 May;58(3):241. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.110848.
10
Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence.全球利什曼病及其发病率的全球估计。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035671. Epub 2012 May 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验