• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股骨颈骨折的全髋关节置换术:医院手术量增加可改善治疗效果。

Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: Improved Outcomes With Higher Hospital Volumes.

作者信息

Maceroli Michael, Nikkel Lucas E, Mahmood Bilal, Ketz John P, Qiu Xing, Ciminelli Joseph, Messing Susan, Elfar John C

机构信息

*Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Center for Orthopaedic Population Studies, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; and†Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology Consulting Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Nov;30(11):597-604. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000662.

DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000662
PMID:27769073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5111872/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine if hospital arthroplasty volume affects patient outcomes after undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from the New York State Department of Health was used to group hospitals into quartiles based on overall THA volume from 2000 to 2010. The database was then queried to identify all patients undergoing THA specifically for femoral neck fracture during this time period. The data were analyzed to investigate outcomes between the 4 volume quartiles in 30-day and 1-year mortality, 1-year revision rate, and 90-day complication rate (readmission for dislocation, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, prosthetic joint infection, or other complications related to arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures with THA).

RESULTS

Patients undergoing THA for femoral neck fracture at hospitals in the top volume quartile had significantly lower 30-day (0.9%) and 1-year (7.51%) mortality than all other volume quartiles. There were no significant differences on pairwise comparisons between the second, third, and fourth quartiles with regard to postoperative mortality. There was no significant difference in revision arthroplasty at 1 year between any of the volume quartiles. On Cox regression analysis, THA for fracture at the lowest volume (fourth) quartile [hazard ratio (HR), 1.91; P = 0.016, 95% confidence interval (CI), (1.13-3.25)], second lowest volume (third) quartile (HR, 2.01; P = 0.013, 95% CI, 1.16-3.5) and third lowest volume (second) quartile (HR, 2.13; P = 0.005, 95% CI, 1.26-3.62) were associated with increased risk for a 1-year postoperative mortality event. Hospital volume quartile was also a significant risk factor for increased 90-day complication (pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis, acute dislocation, prosthetic joint infection) following THA for femoral neck fracture. Having surgery in the fourth quartile (HR, 2.71; P < 0.001, 95% CI, 1.7-4.31), third quartile (HR, 2.61; P < 0.001, 95% CI, 1.61-4.23), and second quartile (HR, 2.41; P < 0.001, 95% CI, 1.51-3.84), all were significant risk factors for increased 90-day complication risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this population-based study indicate that THA for femoral neck fractures at high-volume arthroplasty centers is associated with lower mortality and 90-day complication rates but does not influence 1-year revision rate. THA for femoral neck fractures at top arthroplasty volume quartile hospitals are performed on healthier patients more quickly. Patient health is a critical factor that influences mortality outcomes following THA for femoral neck fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

目的

确定医院关节置换手术量是否会影响移位型股骨颈骨折患者行全髋关节置换术(THA)后的预后。

方法

利用纽约州卫生部的全州规划与研究合作系统数据库,根据2000年至2010年的全髋关节置换总量将医院分为四分位数组。然后查询该数据库,以确定在此期间所有因股骨颈骨折而行全髋关节置换术的患者。对数据进行分析,以研究四分位数组之间在30天和1年死亡率、1年翻修率以及90天并发症发生率(因脱位、深静脉血栓形成、肺栓塞、人工关节感染或其他与全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折相关的并发症再次入院)方面的预后情况。

结果

在手术量最高的四分位数组医院接受股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术的患者,其30天死亡率(0.9%)和1年死亡率(7.51%)显著低于所有其他四分位数组。在术后死亡率方面,第二、第三和第四四分位数组之间的两两比较无显著差异。各四分位数组之间在1年时的关节置换翻修率无显著差异。在Cox回归分析中,手术量最低(第四)四分位数组(风险比[HR],1.91;P = 0.016,95%置信区间[CI],[1.13 - 3.25])、第二低(第三)四分位数组(HR,2.01;P = 0.013,95% CI,1.16 - 3.5)和第三低(第二)四分位数组(HR,2.13;P = 0.005,95% CI,1.26 - 3.62)的股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术与术后1年死亡事件风险增加相关。医院手术量四分位数也是股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术后90天并发症(肺栓塞/深静脉血栓形成、急性脱位、人工关节感染)增加的显著风险因素。在第四四分位数组(HR,2.71;P < 0.001,95% CI,1.7 - 4.31)、第三四分位数组(HR,2.61;P < 0.001,95% CI,1.61 - 4.23)和第二四分位数组(HR,2.41;P < 0.001,95% CI,1.51 - 3.84)进行手术,均是90天并发症风险增加的显著风险因素。

结论

这项基于人群的研究结果表明,在高手术量关节置换中心进行的股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术与较低的死亡率和90天并发症发生率相关,但不影响1年翻修率。在手术量最高的四分位数组医院进行股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术的患者更健康,手术也更快。患者健康状况是影响股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术后死亡率结局的关键因素。

证据水平

预后II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。

相似文献

1
Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: Improved Outcomes With Higher Hospital Volumes.股骨颈骨折的全髋关节置换术:医院手术量增加可改善治疗效果。
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Nov;30(11):597-604. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000662.
2
The Frank Stinchfield Award : Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture Is Not a Typical DRG 470: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study.弗兰克·斯廷奇菲尔德奖:股骨颈骨折的全髋关节置换术并非典型的诊断相关分组470:一项倾向匹配队列研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):353-360. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4868-2.
3
Total, hemi, or dual-mobility arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients with neurological disease : analysis of 9,638 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.神经疾病患者股骨颈骨折的全髋关节、半髋关节或双动髋关节置换术治疗:来自瑞典髋关节置换登记处的 9638 例患者分析。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Jan;104-B(1):134-141. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B1.BJJ-2021-0855.R1.
4
What Is the Association Between Hospital Volume and Complications After Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Large-database Study.医院手术量与翻修全膝关节置换术后并发症的关系:一项大数据库研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1221-1231. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000684.
5
Comparison of dual mobility total hip arthroplasty and bipolar arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: A retrospective case-control study of 199 hips.双动全髋关节置换术与双极人工股骨头置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的比较:199 髋回顾性病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 May;104(3):369-375. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
6
Should All Orthopaedists Perform Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures? A Volume-Outcome Analysis.是否所有骨科医生都应进行股骨颈骨折的人工半髋关节置换术?一项基于量效关系的分析。
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jul;32(7):354-360. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001176.
7
Operative Mortality After Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture and Hospital Volume.股骨颈骨折关节置换术后的手术死亡率与医院规模
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2015 Dec;6(4):239-45. doi: 10.1177/2151458515600496.
8
Femoral neck fractures in New York State. Is the rate of THA increasing, and do race or payer influence decision making?纽约州的股骨颈骨折。全髋关节置换术的比例是否在增加,种族或支付方是否会影响决策?
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jul;28(7):422-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000037.
9
Does surgeon volume for total hip arthroplasty affect outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture?全髋关节置换术的外科医生手术量是否会影响股骨颈骨折半髋关节置换术后的疗效?
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 Aug;39(8):E84-9.
10
Early mortality and morbidity after total hip arthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fracture.股骨颈骨折患者全髋关节置换术后的早期死亡率和发病率
Acta Orthop. 2016 Dec;87(6):560-566. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1234869. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Pipkin type III fractures: a narrative review of literature and comparative opinion on ORIF vs. arthroplasty.皮普金Ⅲ型骨折:文献综述及切开复位内固定术与关节成形术的比较观点
Front Surg. 2025 Aug 18;12:1554603. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1554603. eCollection 2025.
2
Differences in Perioperative Outcomes Between Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty After Previous Proximal Femur Fracture and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.既往股骨近端骨折后行全髋关节置换术转为初次全髋关节置换术的围手术期结局差异
Arthroplast Today. 2025 May 24;33:101715. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101715. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Higher Comorbidities are Correlated With Readmission Following Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture.较高的合并症与股骨颈骨折关节置换术后再入院相关。
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Oct 15;30:101494. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101494. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Complications and Healthcare Cost of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Depressive Disorder.抑郁症患者全髋关节置换术的并发症及医疗费用
Hip Pelvis. 2024 Sep 1;36(3):204-210. doi: 10.5371/hp.2024.36.3.204.
5
Total hip arthroplasty for fractured neck of femur does not restore preoperative hip-specific function, health-related quality of life, or level of fitness.全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折并不能恢复术前髋关节特定功能、健康相关生活质量或体能水平。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Aug;34(6):3081-3088. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04034-1. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
6
Uncommon Twist: Femoral Neck Stress Fracture in a High-Performance Athlete With an Incidental Diagnosis of Femoroacetabular Impingement.罕见病例:一名高水平运动员股骨颈应力性骨折,同时意外诊断为股骨髋臼撞击症
Cureus. 2024 Apr 28;16(4):e59224. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59224. eCollection 2024 Apr.
7
Evaluation of Outcome after Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: Which Factors Are Relevant for Better Results?股骨颈骨折全髋关节置换术后疗效评估:哪些因素与更好的结果相关?
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 23;13(7):1849. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071849.
8
In France, distance from hospital and health care structure impact on outcome after arthroplasty of the hip for proximal fractures of the femur.在法国,股骨近端骨折行髋关节置换术后的结果与医院和医疗结构的距离有关。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 9;18(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03893-4.
9
The Effect of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on Morbidity and Mortality After Femoral Shaft Fractures.外科医生和医院手术量对股骨干骨折患者发病率和死亡率的影响。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 May 3;7(5). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00242. eCollection 2023 May 1.
10
Prediction Models for Prognosis of Femoral Neck-Fracture Patients 6 Months after Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后6个月股骨颈骨折患者预后的预测模型
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Apr 21;15:4339-4356. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S347425. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Delay in Hip Fracture Surgery: An Analysis of Patient-Specific and Hospital-Specific Risk Factors.髋部骨折手术延迟:患者特异性和医院特异性风险因素分析
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Aug;29(8):343-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000313.
2
Risk factors for total hip arthroplasty aseptic revision.全髋关节置换术无菌翻修的危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul;29(7):1412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.023. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
3
Femoral neck fractures in New York State. Is the rate of THA increasing, and do race or payer influence decision making?纽约州的股骨颈骨折。全髋关节置换术的比例是否在增加,种族或支付方是否会影响决策?
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Jul;28(7):422-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000037.
4
Is hospital volume associated with length of stay, re‑admissions and reoperations for total hip replacement? A population‑based register analysis of 78 hospitals and 54,505 replacements.医院手术量与全髋关节置换术的住院时间、再入院和再手术有关吗?基于人群的 78 家医院和 54505 例置换术的登记分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Dec;133(12):1747-55. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1860-0.
5
Comparison of complication rates between hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures.囊内髋关节骨折半髋关节置换术与全髋关节置换术并发症发生率的比较。
Orthopedics. 2013 Apr;36(4):e384-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130327-09.
6
Surgical treatment of trochanteric and cervical hip fractures in the United States: 2000-2009.美国转子间和颈骨髋部骨折的手术治疗:2000-2009 年。
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8):1386-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.007. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
7
Total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: comparing in-hospital mortality, complications, and disposition to an elective patient population.全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折:与择期患者人群的院内死亡率、并发症和处置方式比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct;28(9):1659-62. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.027. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
8
Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials.全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术治疗健康老年移位股骨颈骨折的比较:随机试验的荟萃分析和系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2012 Aug;36(8):1549-60. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1569-7. Epub 2012 May 24.
9
Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: meta-analysis of randomized trials.全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术治疗移位型股骨颈骨折:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2235-43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2293-8. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
10
Impact of comorbidities on hospitalization costs following hip fracture.合并症对髋部骨折后住院费用的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jan 4;94(1):9-17. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01077.