Cheng Chi-Liang, Liu Nai-Jen, Tang Jui-Hsiang, Kuo Yen-Lin, Hung Hsiang-Ling, Tsui Yi-Ning, Lee Bai-Ping, Lin Cheng-Hui
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Evergreen General Hospital, 150 Huan-Zhong East Rd., Zhongli District, Taoyuan, 320, Taiwan.
Department of Gastroenterology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, 5 Fu-Hsin St., Queishan District, Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan.
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Feb;62(2):345-351. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4343-7. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
A 3-l polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution provided better bowel cleansing quality than a 2-l solution for outpatient colonoscopy. Predictors of suboptimal preparation using a 3-l PEG have not been previously reported.
To investigate the possible predictors of suboptimal bowel preparation using 3-l of PEG.
We analyzed a database of 1404 consecutive colonoscopies during a 27-month period at a community hospital. A split-dose PEG regimen was provided for morning colonoscopies, and a same-day PEG regimen was provided for afternoon colonoscopies. The level of bowel cleansing was prospectively scored according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Possible predictors of suboptimal colon preparation, defined as a BBPS score <7, were analyzed using univariate statistics and multivariate logistic regression models.
The mean age of the study population (46.7 % men) was 52.5 years (range 20-80 years, SD 11.1 years), and the majority of patients (77.6 %) underwent morning colonoscopies. A suboptimal bowel preparation was reported in 17.2 % of the observed colonoscopies. In the multivariate regression analysis, constipation (odds ratio [OR] 1.60, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.15-2.22), male gender (OR 1.68, 95 % CI 1.25-2.25), obesity (OR 1.76, 95 % CI 1.29-2.41), and inadequate (<80 %) PEG consumption (OR 5.4, 95 % CI 2.67-10.89) were independent predictors of a suboptimal colon preparation.
This prospective study identified that constipation, male gender, obesity, and inadequate intake of PEG were significant risk factors for suboptimal bowel preparation using a 3-l PEG solution for outpatient colonoscopy. Interventions of optimized colonoscopy preparation should be targeted at these patient populations.
对于门诊结肠镜检查,3升聚乙二醇(PEG)溶液的肠道清洁质量优于2升溶液。此前尚未报道使用3升PEG时肠道准备不佳的预测因素。
研究使用3升PEG进行肠道准备不佳的可能预测因素。
我们分析了一家社区医院在27个月期间连续1404例结肠镜检查的数据库。上午进行结肠镜检查采用分剂量PEG方案,下午进行结肠镜检查采用当日PEG方案。根据波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)对肠道清洁水平进行前瞻性评分。使用单变量统计和多变量逻辑回归模型分析肠道准备不佳(定义为BBPS评分<7)的可能预测因素。
研究人群的平均年龄为52.5岁(男性占46.7%),年龄范围为20 - 80岁(标准差11.1岁),大多数患者(77.6%)接受上午的结肠镜检查。在观察到的结肠镜检查中,17.2%报告肠道准备不佳。在多变量回归分析中,便秘(比值比[OR] 1.60,95%置信区间[CI] 1.15 - 2.22)、男性(OR 1.68,95% CI 1.25 - 2.25)、肥胖(OR 1.76,95% CI 1.29 - 2.41)以及PEG摄入量不足(<80%)(OR 5.4,95% CI 2.67 - 10.89)是肠道准备不佳的独立预测因素。
这项前瞻性研究表明,便秘、男性、肥胖以及PEG摄入不足是使用3升PEG溶液进行门诊结肠镜检查时肠道准备不佳的重要危险因素。优化结肠镜检查准备的干预措施应针对这些患者群体。