Osorio Alfonso, González-Cámara Marta
University of Navarra.
Psicothema. 2016 Nov;28(4):414-420. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2015.314.
While international studies have reported the superiority of the authoritative style (which combines parental involvement with demandingness), some studies in Spain and in other countries have found that the indulgent style (involvement without demandingness) might be just as good or even better. This study aims to discern whether the differences are cultural or methodological.
306 adolescents from high schools in Madrid and Valencia (Spain) answered a questionnaire that included two parenting style instruments (SOC-30 and PSI), together with a self-esteem scale (AF5) and a question on academic performance.
Concordance between the two instruments assessing parenting styles was poor. When associating parenting styles (according to the SOC-30) with outcomes (self-esteem and academic achievement), results were similar to previous studies in Spain. But if we use the PSI, results were similar to studies in Anglophone countries: the authoritative style achieved the best outcomes.
The discrepancies found between studies carried out in Spain and in Anglophone countries do not seem to be due to differences between cultures, but to methodological differences (i.e., differences between the instruments used). If we use the same instruments that were used in Anglophone countries, the most effective parenting style is still the authoritative.
虽然国际研究报告了权威型教养方式(将父母参与和严格要求相结合)的优越性,但西班牙和其他国家的一些研究发现,放任型教养方式(有参与但无严格要求)可能同样好甚至更好。本研究旨在辨别这些差异是文化上的还是方法上的。
来自西班牙马德里和瓦伦西亚高中的306名青少年回答了一份问卷,其中包括两种教养方式量表(SOC - 30和PSI),以及一份自尊量表(AF5)和一个关于学业成绩的问题。
评估教养方式的两种量表之间的一致性较差。当将教养方式(根据SOC - 30)与结果(自尊和学业成就)联系起来时,结果与西班牙之前的研究相似。但如果我们使用PSI,结果与英语国家的研究相似:权威型教养方式取得了最好的结果。
在西班牙和英语国家进行的研究之间发现的差异似乎不是由于文化差异,而是方法上的差异(即所使用量表之间的差异)。如果我们使用与英语国家相同的量表,最有效的教养方式仍然是权威型。