Applied Physiology and Nutrition Research Group, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Musculoskeletal Physiology Research Group, Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Apr;51(8):658-669. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096396. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence on the effects of β-alanine supplementation on exercise capacity and performance.
This study was designed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A 3-level mixed effects model was employed to model effect sizes and account for dependencies within data.
3 databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science) were searched using a number of terms ('β-alanine' and 'Beta-alanine' combined with 'supplementation', 'exercise', 'training', 'athlete', 'performance' and 'carnosine').
Inclusion/exclusion criteria limited articles to double-blinded, placebo-controlled studies investigating the effects of β-alanine supplementation on an exercise measure. All healthy participant populations were considered, while supplementation protocols were restricted to chronic ingestion. Cross-over designs were excluded due to the long washout period for skeletal muscle carnosine following supplementation. A single outcome measure was extracted for each exercise protocol and converted to effect sizes for meta-analyses.
40 individual studies employing 65 different exercise protocols and totalling 70 exercise measures in 1461 participants were included in the analyses. A significant overall effect size of 0.18 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.28) was shown. Meta-regression demonstrated that exercise duration significantly (p=0.004) moderated effect sizes. Subgroup analyses also identified the type of exercise as a significant (p=0.013) moderator of effect sizes within an exercise time frame of 0.5-10 min with greater effect sizes for exercise capacity (0.4998 (95% CI 0.246 to 0.753)) versus performance (0.1078 (95% CI -0.201 to 0.416)). There was no moderating effect of training status (p=0.559), intermittent or continuous exercise (p=0.436) or total amount of β-alanine ingested (p=0.438). Co-supplementation with sodium bicarbonate resulted in the largest effect size when compared with placebo (0.43 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.64)).
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS: β-alanine had a significant overall effect while subgroup analyses revealed a number of modifying factors. These data allow individuals to make informed decisions as to the likelihood of an ergogenic effect with β-alanine supplementation based on their chosen exercise modality.
系统回顾和荟萃分析 β-丙氨酸补充对运动能力和表现的影响的证据。
本研究按照 PRISMA 指南设计。采用三级混合效应模型对效应大小进行建模,并考虑数据内部的依存关系。
使用了一些术语(“β-丙氨酸”和“Beta-alanine”与“补充”、“运动”、“训练”、“运动员”、“表现”和“肌肽”),在 3 个数据库(PubMed、Google Scholar、Web of Science)中搜索。
纳入/排除标准的研究标准:将文章限定为双盲、安慰剂对照研究,研究 β-丙氨酸补充对运动测量的影响。考虑了所有健康参与者群体,而补充方案仅限于慢性摄入。由于补充后骨骼肌肌肽的洗脱期较长,因此排除了交叉设计。从每个运动方案中提取一个单一的结果测量值,并转换为荟萃分析的效应大小。
40 项研究采用 65 种不同的运动方案,对 1461 名参与者的 70 项运动措施进行了分析。显示出 0.18 的显著总体效应大小(95%CI 0.08 至 0.28)。元回归表明,运动持续时间显著(p=0.004)调节了效应大小。亚组分析还确定了运动类型是在 0.5-10 分钟的运动时间内影响效应大小的重要(p=0.013)调节剂,对于运动能力(0.4998(95%CI 0.246 至 0.753))的效应大小大于表现(0.1078(95%CI -0.201 至 0.416))。训练状态(p=0.559)、间歇性或连续性运动(p=0.436)或摄入的 β-丙氨酸总量(p=0.438)没有调节作用。与安慰剂相比,与碳酸氢钠共同补充时,效果最大(0.43(95%CI 0.22 至 0.64))。
总结/结论:β-丙氨酸具有显著的总体效果,而亚组分析揭示了一些调节因素。这些数据使个人能够根据他们选择的运动方式,就 β-丙氨酸补充的可能的运动效果做出明智的决定。