• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表自评版在初级保健中的使用看法。

Patients' perspectives on the use of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale self-assessment version in primary care.

作者信息

Wikberg Carl, Pettersson Agneta, Westman Jeanette, Björkelund Cecilia, Petersson Eva-Lisa

机构信息

a Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Primary Health Care , Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg , Gothenburg , Sweden.

b Närhälsan Research and Development Primary Health Care , Region Västra Götaland , Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Dec;34(4):434-442. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1248635. Epub 2016 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1080/02813432.2016.1248635
PMID:27804312
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5217279/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the current study was to better understand how patients with depression perceive the use of MADRS-S in primary care consultations with GPs.

DESIGN

Qualitative study. Focus group discussion and analysis through Systematic Text Condensation.

SETTING

Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden.

SUBJECTS

Nine patients with mild/moderate depression who participated in a RCT evaluating the effects of regular use of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Self-assessment scale (MADRS-S) during the GP consultations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Patients' experiences and perceptions of the use of MADRS-S in primary care.

RESULTS

Three categories emerged from the analysis: (I) confirmation; MADRS-S shows that I have depression and how serious it is, (II) centeredness; the most important thing is for the GP to listen to and take me seriously and (III) clarification; MADRS-S helps me understand why I need treatment for depression.

CONCLUSION

Use of MADRS-S was perceived as a confirmation for the patients that they had depression and how serious it was. MADRS-S showed the patients something black on white that describes and confirms the diagnosis. The informants emphasized the importance of patient-centeredness; of being listened to and to be taken seriously during the consultation. Use of self-assessment scales such as MADRS-S could find its place, but needs to adjust to the multifaceted environment that primary care provides. Key Points Patients with depression in primary care perceive that the use of a self-assessment scale in the consultation purposefully can contribute in several ways. The scale contributes to Confirmation: MADRS-S shows that I have depression and how serious it is. Centeredness: The most important thing is for the GP to listen to and take me seriously. Clarification: MADRS-S helps me understand why I need treatment for depression.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是更好地了解抑郁症患者如何看待在与全科医生进行初级保健咨询时使用蒙哥马利-Åsberg 抑郁自评量表(MADRS-S)。

设计

定性研究。通过系统文本浓缩进行焦点小组讨论和分析。

地点

瑞典韦斯特罗斯-哥特兰地区的初级卫生保健机构。

研究对象

九名轻度/中度抑郁症患者,他们参与了一项随机对照试验,该试验评估了在全科医生咨询期间定期使用蒙哥马利-Åsberg 抑郁自评量表(MADRS-S)的效果。

主要观察指标

患者在初级保健中使用 MADRS-S 的体验和看法。

结果

分析得出三类结果:(I)确认;MADRS-S 表明我患有抑郁症以及病情的严重程度,(II)以患者为中心;最重要的是全科医生倾听并认真对待我,(III)澄清;MADRS-S 帮助我理解为什么我需要接受抑郁症治疗。

结论

患者认为使用 MADRS-S 可确认他们患有抑郁症以及病情的严重程度。MADRS-S 向患者白纸黑字地展示了描述并确认诊断的内容。受访者强调了以患者为中心的重要性;即在咨询过程中被倾听并得到认真对待。像 MADRS-S 这样的自评量表可以发挥作用,但需要适应初级保健所提供的多方面环境。要点 初级保健中的抑郁症患者认为,在咨询中有意使用自评量表可在多个方面发挥作用。该量表有助于确认:MADRS-S 表明我患有抑郁症以及病情的严重程度。以患者为中心:最重要的是全科医生倾听并认真对待我。澄清:MADRS-S 帮助我理解为什么我需要接受抑郁症治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7372/5217279/db5a9c5e1317/ipri-34-434.F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7372/5217279/db5a9c5e1317/ipri-34-434.F01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7372/5217279/db5a9c5e1317/ipri-34-434.F01.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' perspectives on the use of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale self-assessment version in primary care.患者对蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表自评版在初级保健中的使用看法。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Dec;34(4):434-442. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1248635. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
2
A comparison between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the self-rating version of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).贝克抑郁量表(BDI)与蒙哥马利-艾森伯格抑郁评定量表自评版(MADRS)的比较。
J Affect Disord. 2001 May;64(2-3):203-16. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(00)00242-1.
3
Agreement between physicians' and patients' ratings on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.医生和患者在蒙哥马利-Åsberg 抑郁评定量表上的评分一致性。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Dec;135(1-3):148-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.07.005.
4
Using patient-centred consultation when screening for depression in elderly patients: a comparative pilot study.使用以患者为中心的咨询方法对老年患者进行抑郁症筛查:一项比较性试点研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Mar;29(1):51-6. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.554011.
5
Evaluation of depressive symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease using the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.采用蒙哥马利-Åsberg 抑郁评定量表评估冠心病患者的抑郁症状。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Sep;27(5):249-55. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e328357670d.
6
The self-reported Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale is a useful evaluative tool in Major Depressive Disorder.自我报告的蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表是重度抑郁症中一种有用的评估工具。
BMC Psychiatry. 2009 May 27;9:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-9-26.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale parent report among adolescent psychiatric outpatients.蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁评定量表家长报告在青少年精神科门诊患者中的诊断准确性。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;72(3):184-190. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2017.1414873. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
8
Derivation of a definition of remission on the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale corresponding to the definition of remission on the Hamilton rating scale for depression.推导蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表上与汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表上缓解定义相对应的缓解定义。
J Psychiatr Res. 2004 Nov-Dec;38(6):577-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2004.03.007.
9
Primary care management of major depression in patients aged > or =55 years: outcome of a randomised clinical trial.≥55岁患者重度抑郁症的初级保健管理:一项随机临床试验的结果
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Oct;58(555):680-6, I-II; discussion 687. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X342165.
10
A comparison of psychometric properties between internet and paper versions of two depression instruments (BDI-II and MADRS-S) administered to clinic patients.针对临床患者使用的两种抑郁量表(贝克抑郁量表第二版和蒙哥马利-艾森伯格抑郁量表简版)的网络版和纸质版心理测量特性的比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 19;12(5):e49. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1392.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the medical file: A scoping review on patients' perspectives on depression treatment in primary care.超越医疗档案:关于患者对初级保健中抑郁症治疗看法的范围综述
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 5;20(6):e0293713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293713. eCollection 2025.
2
The Impact of Systemic Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis on Depressive Symptoms: A Prospective Clinical Cohort Study.特应性皮炎系统治疗对抑郁症状的影响:一项前瞻性临床队列研究。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2022 Oct 24;102:adv00801. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v102.803.
3
Patients' experiences and perspectives of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison Between the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale-Self and the Beck Depression Inventory II in Primary Care.初级保健中蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表-自评版与贝克抑郁量表第二版的比较
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2015 Jun 25;17(3). doi: 10.4088/PCC.14m01758. eCollection 2015.
2
Determinants of adherence to recommendations for depressed elderly patients in primary care: a multi-methods study.基层医疗中老年抑郁症患者对推荐治疗方案的依从性决定因素:一项多方法研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2014 Dec;32(4):170-9. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2014.984961. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
3
To score or not to score: a qualitative study on GPs views on the use of instruments for depression.
患者在临床护理中对患者报告结局测量的体验和看法:系统评价和定性荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 21;17(4):e0267030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267030. eCollection 2022.
4
Naturalistic Study of Depression Associated with Parkinson's Disease in a National Public Neurological Referral Center in Mexico.墨西哥一家国家公共神经科转诊中心对帕金森病伴发抑郁症的自然主义研究。
Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 28;12(3):326. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12030326.
5
Self-reported sick leave following a brief preventive intervention on work-related stress: a randomised controlled trial in primary health care.自我报告的病假后,简要的预防干预工作相关的压力:一项随机对照试验,在初级卫生保健。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 22;11(3):e041157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041157.
6
Correspondence Between the Neuropsychiatric Interview M.I.N.I. and the BDI-II and MADRS-S Self-Rating Instruments as Diagnostic Tools in Primary Care Patients with Depression.神经精神科访谈量表M.I.N.I.与贝克抑郁自评量表(BDI-II)及蒙哥马利-艾森伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS-S)作为基层医疗中抑郁症患者诊断工具的相关性
Int J Gen Med. 2020 May 14;13:177-183. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S243150. eCollection 2020.
7
Does early identification of high work related stress affect pharmacological treatment of primary care patients? - analysis of Swedish pharmacy dispensing data in a randomised control study.高工作相关压力的早期识别是否会影响初级保健患者的药物治疗?——一项随机对照研究中瑞典药房配药数据的分析。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Apr 25;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01140-x.
8
Does early identification of work-related stress, combined with feedback at GP-consultation, prevent sick leave in the following 12 months? a randomized controlled trial in primary health care.工作相关压力的早期识别,结合全科医生就诊时的反馈,是否能预防接下来 12 个月的病假?初级保健中的一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):1110. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7452-3.
9
Creating a safety net for patients with depression in primary care; a qualitative study of care managers' experiences.为初级保健中的抑郁症患者建立安全网;对护理经理经验的定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Dec;36(4):355-362. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1529018. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
10
A qualitative study of patients' perceptions of the utility of patient-reported outcome measures of symptoms in primary care clinics.一项关于患者对初级保健诊所中症状患者报告结局测量工具实用性看法的定性研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Dec;27(12):3157-3166. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1968-3. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
计分还是不计分:关于全科医生对抑郁症诊断工具使用看法的定性研究
Fam Pract. 2014 Apr;31(2):215-21. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt082. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
4
Psychiatric assessment of mood instability: qualitative study of patient experience.心境不稳的精神病学评估:患者体验的定性研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;204(3):234-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.128348. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
5
Drivers of overall satisfaction with primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey.基层医疗总体满意度的驱动因素:来自英国全科医疗患者调查的证据。
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1081-92. doi: 10.1111/hex.12081. Epub 2013 May 30.
6
Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis.系统文本浓缩:一种定性分析策略。
Scand J Public Health. 2012 Dec;40(8):795-805. doi: 10.1177/1403494812465030.
7
Improving the health of patients and populations requires humility, uncertainty, and collaboration.
JAMA. 2012 Oct 24;308(16):1691-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.14477.
8
What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies.N 怎么办?一项关于焦点小组研究中样本量报告方法的研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Mar 11;11:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-26.
9
Collaborative care for patients with depression and chronic illnesses.共病抑郁症与慢性疾病患者的协作式照护。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 30;363(27):2611-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003955.
10
Patients can diagnose too: How continuous self-assessment aids diagnosis of, and recovery from, depression.患者也可以诊断:持续自我评估如何帮助诊断和从抑郁症中康复。
J Ment Health. 2010 Aug;19(4):352-62. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2010.494188.