Chun Seokjoon, Harris Alexa, Carrion Margely, Rojas Elizabeth, Stark Stephen, Lejuez Carl, Lechner William V, Bornovalova Marina A
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida.
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Jan;126(1):76-88. doi: 10.1037/abn0000220. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
The comorbidity between borderline personality disorder (BPD) and antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is well-established, and the 2 disorders share many similarities. However, there are also differences across disorders: most notably, BPD is diagnosed more frequently in women and ASPD in men. We investigated if (a) comorbidity between BPD and ASPD is attributable to 2 discrete disorders or the expression of common underlying processes, and (b) if the model of comorbidity is true across sex. Using a clinical sample of 1,400 drug users in residential substance abuse treatment, we tested 3 competing models to explore whether the comorbidity of ASPD and BPD should be represented by a single common factor, 2 correlated factors, or a bifactor structure involving a general and disorder-specific factors. Next, we tested whether our resulting model was meaningful by examining its relationship with criterion variables previously reported to be associated with BPD and ASPD. The bifactor model provided the best fit and was invariant across sex. Overall, the general factor of the bifactor model significantly accounted for a large percentage of the variance in criterion variables, whereas the BPD and AAB specific factors added little to the models. The association of the general and specific factor with all criterion variables was equal for men and women. Our results suggest common underlying vulnerability accounts for both the comorbidity between BPD and AAB (across sex), and this common vulnerability drives the association with other psychopathology and maladaptive behavior. This in turn has implications for diagnostic classification systems and treatment. (PsycINFO Database Record
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)与反社会型人格障碍(ASPD)之间的共病关系已得到充分证实,且这两种障碍有许多相似之处。然而,不同障碍之间也存在差异:最显著的是,BPD在女性中诊断更为频繁,而ASPD在男性中更为常见。我们研究了(a)BPD与ASPD之间的共病是归因于两种独立的障碍还是共同潜在过程的表达,以及(b)共病模型在不同性别中是否成立。我们使用了1400名接受住院药物滥用治疗的吸毒者的临床样本,测试了3种相互竞争的模型,以探讨ASPD和BPD的共病是应由单一共同因素、两个相关因素还是由一个一般因素和特定障碍因素组成的双因素结构来表示。接下来,我们通过检查其与先前报道的与BPD和ASPD相关的标准变量的关系,来测试我们得出的模型是否有意义。双因素模型提供了最佳拟合,且在不同性别中具有不变性。总体而言,双因素模型的一般因素在很大程度上显著解释了标准变量的方差,而BPD和ASPD的特定因素对模型的贡献很小。男性和女性的一般因素和特定因素与所有标准变量的关联是相等的。我们的结果表明,共同的潜在易感性解释了BPD和ASPD之间的共病(在不同性别中),并且这种共同的易感性驱动了与其他精神病理学和适应不良行为的关联。这反过来对诊断分类系统和治疗有影响。(PsycINFO数据库记录)