Zhang Xu, Wang Dong, Shi Min, Luo YuanGuo
Department of Anesthesiology, Guilin 181st Hospital, No. 1 Xinqiaoyuan Street, Guilin, 541002, Guangxi, People's Republic of China.
Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Apr;37(4):343-354. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0477-9.
Several clinical trials have examined and indicated the usefulness of epidural dexmedetomidine therapy. However, there has been no systematic analysis of the findings of these trials to date. We undertook this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of epidural dexmedetomidine adjunctive therapy in different surgical procedures.
We searched EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Clinical Trials.gov database to identify randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of epidural dexmedetomidine adjunctive therapy. The article search was conducted without language or date restrictions. The date of the last search was 27 July 2016. The mean differences (MD) or standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous variables, and risk ratios (RRs) were presented for dichotomous outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed using τ , χ and I analyses.
Twelve randomized controlled trials were included in the final analysis. Compared with the control treatment, epidural dexmedetomidine administration prolonged the duration of analgesia (P < 0.0001), reduced the time to sensory block (P = 0.002), decreased the requirement for rescue analgesia (P < 0.00001) and achieved a significantly higher sedation score (P < 0.0001). Although dexmedetomidine adjunctive therapy did not affect mean arterial pressure (P = 0.33), systolic blood pressure (P = 0.32) or diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.28), it significantly lowered heart rate (P = 0.0009). Symptoms indicative of hypotension and bradycardia events were more common in the dexmedetomidine group, but the difference in the overall risk of hypotension and bradycardia was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05) in comparison with that reported for the control therapies. Furthermore, dexmedetomidine effectively reduced post-operative pain (P = 0.03), whilst the occurrence of other side effects, such as pruritus, dizziness, dry mouth, nausea and vomiting did not differ significantly from that reported for the control therapies, except the risk of shivering was significantly higher with control therapies (P = 0.03).
This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in epidural procedures is generally safe and well tolerated. Furthermore, dexmedetomidine acted synergistically and provided an improved sedation and analgesic profile.
多项临床试验已对硬膜外给予右美托咪定治疗的有效性进行了研究并有所提示。然而,迄今为止尚未对这些试验的结果进行系统分析。我们进行了这项系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究硬膜外右美托咪定辅助治疗在不同外科手术中的疗效和安全性。
我们检索了EMBASE、PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库,以确定调查硬膜外右美托咪定辅助治疗效果的随机对照试验。文献检索不受语言或日期限制。最后一次检索日期为2016年7月27日。对连续变量计算95%置信区间(CI)的平均差(MD)或标准化平均差(SMD),对二分法结果给出风险比(RR)。使用τ、χ和I分析评估异质性。
最终分析纳入了12项随机对照试验。与对照治疗相比,硬膜外给予右美托咪定可延长镇痛时间(P < 0.0001),缩短感觉阻滞时间(P = 0.002),减少补救性镇痛的需求(P < 0.00001),并获得显著更高的镇静评分(P < 0.0001)。虽然右美托咪定辅助治疗不影响平均动脉压(P = 0.33)、收缩压(P = 0.32)或舒张压(P = 0.28),但可显著降低心率(P = 0.0009)。右美托咪定组中提示低血压和心动过缓事件的症状更为常见,但与对照治疗相比,低血压和心动过缓的总体风险差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。此外,右美托咪定可有效减轻术后疼痛(P = 0.03),而其他副作用如瘙痒、头晕、口干、恶心和呕吐的发生率与对照治疗相比差异无统计学意义,除了对照治疗的寒战风险显著更高(P = 0.03)。
这项系统评价和荟萃分析表明,右美托咪定作为硬膜外手术的辅助用药总体上是安全的且耐受性良好。此外,右美托咪定具有协同作用,可改善镇静和镇痛效果。