Gómez-Batiste Xavier, Mateo-Ortega Dolors, Lasmarías Cristina, Novellas Anna, Espinosa Jose, Beas Elba, Ela Sara, Barbero Javier
The Qualy End-of-Life Observatory-WHO Collaborating Center for Palliative Care Programs,Catalan Institute of Oncology. Barcelona,Spain.
Hematology Unit,Hospital Universitario La Paz. Madrid,Spain.
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Feb;15(1):98-109. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516000857. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
We aimed to describe the overall quantitative and qualitative results of a "La Caixa" Foundation and World Health Organization Collaborating Center Program entitled "Comprehensive Care for Patients with Advanced Illnesses and their Families" after four years of experience.
Qualitative and quantitative methods were employed to assess the program. Quasiexperimental, prospective, multicenter, single-group, and pretest/posttest methods were utilized to assess the quantitative data. The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions was assessed at baseline (visit 1) and after four follow-up visits. The following dimensions were assessed: mood state, discomfort, anxiety, degree of adjustment or adaptation to disease, and suffering. We also assessed the four dimensions of the spiritual pain scale: faith or spiritual beliefs, valuable faith or spiritual beliefs, meaning in life, and peace of mind/forgiveness. Qualitative analyses were performed via surveys to evaluate stakeholder satisfaction.
We built 29 psychosocial support teams involving 133 professionals-mainly psychologists and social workers. During the study period, 8,964 patients and 11,810 family members attended. Significant improvements were observed in the psychosocial and spiritual dimensions assessed. Patients, family members, and stakeholders all showed high levels of satisfaction.
This model of psychosocial care could serve as an example for other countries that wish to improve psychosocial and spiritual support. Our results confirm that specific psychosocial interventions delivered by well-trained experts can help to ease suffering and discomfort in end-of-life and palliative care patients, particularly those with high levels of pain or emotional distress.
我们旨在描述“La Caixa”基金会与世界卫生组织合作中心项目“晚期疾病患者及其家庭的综合护理”在历经四年实践后的总体定量和定性结果。
采用定性和定量方法对该项目进行评估。使用准实验、前瞻性、多中心、单组以及前测/后测方法来评估定量数据。在基线(第1次访视)和四次随访后评估心理社会干预的效果。评估以下维度:情绪状态、不适、焦虑、对疾病的适应程度以及痛苦程度。我们还评估了精神痛苦量表的四个维度:信仰或精神信念、有价值的信仰或精神信念、生活意义以及内心平静/宽恕。通过调查进行定性分析以评估利益相关者的满意度。
我们组建了29个心理社会支持团队,涉及133名专业人员,主要是心理学家和社会工作者。在研究期间,有8964名患者和11810名家庭成员参与。在所评估的心理社会和精神维度上观察到了显著改善。患者、家庭成员和利益相关者均表现出高度满意度。
这种心理社会护理模式可以为其他希望改善心理社会和精神支持的国家提供范例。我们的结果证实,由训练有素的专家提供的特定心理社会干预可以帮助缓解临终和姑息治疗患者的痛苦和不适,尤其是那些疼痛或情绪困扰程度较高的患者。