Suppr超能文献

用于预测急诊科老年创伤患者死亡率的休克指数、改良休克指数和年龄休克指数的验证

Validation of the Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, and Age Shock Index for Predicting Mortality of Geriatric Trauma Patients in Emergency Departments.

作者信息

Kim Soon Yong, Hong Ki Jeong, Shin Sang Do, Ro Young Sun, Ahn Ki Ok, Kim Yu Jin, Lee Eui Jung

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Dec;31(12):2026-2032. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.12.2026.

Abstract

The shock index (SI), modified shock index (MSI), and age multiplied by SI (Age SI) are used to assess the severity and predict the mortality of trauma patients, but their validity for geriatric patients is controversial. The purpose of this investigation was to assess predictive value of the SI, MSI, and Age SI for geriatric trauma patients. We used the Emergency Department-based Injury In-depth Surveillance (EDIIS), which has data from 20 EDs across Korea. Patients older than 65 years who had traumatic injuries from January 2008 to December 2013 were enrolled. We compared in-hospital and ED mortality of groups categorized as stable and unstable according to indexes. We also assessed their predictive power of each index by calculating the area under the each receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. A total of 45,880 cases were included. The percentage of cases classified as unstable was greater among non-survivors than survivors for the SI (36.6% vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001), the MSI (38.6% vs. 2.2%, P < 0.001), and the Age SI (69.4% vs. 21.3%, P < 0.001). Non-survivors had higher median values than survivors on the SI (0.84 vs. 0.57, P < 0.001), MSI (0.79 vs. 1.14, P < 0.001), and Age SI (64.0 vs. 41.5, P < 0.001). The predictive power of the Age SI for in-hospital mortality was higher than SI (AUROC: 0.740 vs. 0.674, P < 0.001) or MSI (0.682, P < 0.001) in geriatric trauma patients.

摘要

休克指数(SI)、改良休克指数(MSI)以及年龄乘以休克指数(年龄-SI)用于评估创伤患者的严重程度并预测其死亡率,但其在老年患者中的有效性存在争议。本研究的目的是评估SI、MSI和年龄-SI对老年创伤患者的预测价值。我们使用了基于急诊科的损伤深度监测(EDIIS),该监测有来自韩国20家急诊科的数据。纳入了2008年1月至2013年12月期间有创伤性损伤的65岁以上患者。我们比较了根据指标分为稳定和不稳定组的患者的院内死亡率和急诊科死亡率。我们还通过计算每个受试者工作特征(AUROC)曲线下的面积来评估每个指标的预测能力。共纳入45880例病例。在非幸存者中,SI(36.6%对1.8%,P<0.001)、MSI(38.6%对2.2%,P<0.001)和年龄-SI(69.4%对21.3%,P<0.001)分类为不稳定的病例百分比高于幸存者。非幸存者的SI(0.84对0.57,P<0.001)、MSI(0.79对1.14,P<0.001)和年龄-SI(64.0对41.5,P<0.001)的中位数高于幸存者。在老年创伤患者中,年龄-SI对院内死亡率的预测能力高于SI(AUROC:0.740对0.674,P<0.001)或MSI(0.682,P<0.001)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ba/5102870/78cdf1a0ba1e/jkms-31-2026-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验