van Passel Boris, Danner Unna, Dingemans Alexandra, van Furth Eric, Sternheim Lot, van Elburg Annemarie, van Minnen Agnes, van den Hout Marcel, Hendriks Gert-Jan, Cath Daniëlle
Pro Persona, Centre for Anxiety Disorders Overwaal, Institution for Integrated Mental Health Care, Pastoor van Laakstraat 48, Lent, Nijmegen, 6663 CB, The Netherlands.
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Montessorilaan 3, Nijmegen, 6525 HR, The Netherlands.
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 10;16(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1109-x.
Anorexia nervosa (AN) and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) are among the most incapacitating and costly of mental disorders. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT), medication, and combination regimens, to which in AN personalised guidance on weight control is added, are moderately successful, leaving room for more effective treatment algorithms. An underlying deficit which the two disorders share is cognitive inflexibility, a trait that is likely to impede treatment engagement and reduce patients' ability to benefit from treatment. Cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) is an easy-to-use intervention aimed at reducing cognitive inflexibility and thereby enhancing treatment outcome, which we aim to test in a controled study.
In a randomized-controlled multicenter clinical trial 64 adult patients with AN and 64 with OCD are randomized to 10 bi-weekly sessions with either CRT or a control condition, after which Treatment As Usual (TAU) is started. All patients are evaluated during single-blind assessments at baseline, post-CRT/control intervention, and after 6 months. Indices of treatment effect are disorder-specific symptom severity, quality of life, and cost-effectivity. Also, moderators and mediators of treatment effects will be studied.
To our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial using an control condition evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of CRT as a treatment enhancer preceding TAU for AN, and the first study to investigate CRT in OCD, moreover taking cost-effectiveness of CRT in AN and OCD into account.
The Netherlands Trial Register NTR3865 . Registered 20 february 2013.
神经性厌食症(AN)和强迫症(OCD)是最使人丧失能力且代价高昂的精神障碍之一。认知行为疗法(CBT)、药物治疗以及联合治疗方案(在神经性厌食症治疗中还增加了体重控制的个性化指导)取得了一定成效,但仍有提升空间,需要更有效的治疗算法。这两种疾病共有的一个潜在缺陷是认知灵活性不足,这一特质可能会阻碍治疗参与并降低患者从治疗中获益的能力。认知康复疗法(CRT)是一种易于实施的干预措施,旨在减少认知灵活性不足,从而提高治疗效果,我们旨在通过一项对照研究对其进行测试。
在一项随机对照多中心临床试验中,64名成年神经性厌食症患者和64名强迫症患者被随机分为两组,一组接受为期10周、每两周一次的认知康复疗法治疗,另一组接受对照治疗,之后开始常规治疗(TAU)。所有患者在基线、认知康复疗法/对照干预后以及6个月后进行单盲评估。治疗效果指标包括特定疾病的症状严重程度、生活质量和成本效益。此外,还将研究治疗效果的调节因素和中介因素。
据我们所知,这是第一项使用对照条件评估认知康复疗法作为常规治疗前增强治疗效果的随机对照试验,也是第一项在强迫症中研究认知康复疗法的研究,同时还考虑了认知康复疗法在神经性厌食症和强迫症中的成本效益。
荷兰试验注册编号NTR3865。2013年2月20日注册。