Saw Anna E, Kellmann Michael, Main Luana C, Gastin Paul B
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Apr;12(Suppl 2):S2127-S2135. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0395. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
Athlete self-report measures (ASRM) have the potential to provide valuable insight into the training response; however, there is a disconnect between research and practice that needs to be addressed; namely, the measure or methods used in research are not always reflective of practice, or data primarily obtained from practice lacks empirical quality. This commentary reviews existing empirical measures and the psychometric properties required to be considered acceptable for research and practice. This information will allow discerning readers to make a judgment on the quality of ASRM data being reported in research papers. Fastidious practitioners and researchers are also provided with explicit guidelines for selecting and implementing an ASRM and reporting these details in research papers.
运动员自我报告测量法（ASRM）有潜力为训练反应提供有价值的见解；然而，研究与实践之间存在脱节问题需要解决；也就是说，研究中使用的测量方法或手段并不总是反映实践情况，或者主要从实践中获得的数据缺乏实证质量。本评论回顾了现有的实证测量方法以及被认为在研究和实践中可接受所需的心理测量特性。这些信息将使有辨别力的读者能够对研究论文中报告的ASRM数据质量做出判断。严谨的从业者和研究人员还将获得关于选择和实施ASRM以及在研究论文中报告这些细节的明确指导方针。
