Aberg Kristoffer Carl, Doell Kimberly C, Schwartz Sophie
Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 16;11(11):e0166675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166675. eCollection 2016.
Learning how to gain rewards (approach learning) and avoid punishments (avoidance learning) is fundamental for everyday life. While individual differences in approach and avoidance learning styles have been related to genetics and aging, the contribution of personality factors, such as traits, remains undetermined. Moreover, little is known about the computational mechanisms mediating differences in learning styles. Here, we used a probabilistic selection task with positive and negative feedbacks, in combination with computational modelling, to show that individuals displaying better approach (vs. avoidance) learning scored higher on measures of approach (vs. avoidance) trait motivation, but, paradoxically, also displayed reduced learning speed following positive (vs. negative) outcomes. These data suggest that learning different types of information depend on associated reward values and internal motivational drives, possibly determined by personality traits.
学习如何获得奖励(趋近学习)和避免惩罚(回避学习)是日常生活的基础。虽然趋近和回避学习风格的个体差异与基因和衰老有关,但人格因素(如特质)的作用仍未确定。此外,对于介导学习风格差异的计算机制知之甚少。在这里,我们使用了一个带有正反馈和负反馈的概率选择任务,并结合计算建模,以表明在趋近(相对于回避)学习方面表现更好的个体在趋近(相对于回避)特质动机测量中得分更高,但矛盾的是,在获得正(相对于负)结果后,他们的学习速度也会降低。这些数据表明,学习不同类型的信息取决于相关的奖励价值和内在动机驱动,这可能由人格特质决定。