• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

媒体内容中的科学不确定性:本期特刊引言

Scientific uncertainty in media content: Introduction to this special issue.

作者信息

Peters Hans Peter, Dunwoody Sharon

机构信息

Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany

University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2016 Nov;25(8):893-908. doi: 10.1177/0963662516670765.

DOI:10.1177/0963662516670765
PMID:27856828
Abstract

This introduction sets the stage for the special issue on the public communication of scientific uncertainty that follows by sketching the wider landscape of issues related to the communication of uncertainty and showing how the individual contributions fit into that landscape. The first part of the introduction discusses the creation of media content as a process involving journalists, scientific sources, stakeholders, and the responsive audience. The second part then provides an overview of the perception of scientific uncertainty presented by the media and the consequences for the recipients' own assessments of uncertainty. Finally, we briefly describe the six research articles included in this special issue.

摘要

本引言通过勾勒与不确定性传播相关的更广泛问题图景,并展示各独立贡献如何融入该图景,为后续关于科学不确定性的公众传播的特刊奠定了基础。引言的第一部分讨论了媒体内容的创作过程,该过程涉及记者、科学信息源、利益相关者和有反馈的受众。第二部分则概述了媒体呈现的科学不确定性观念及其对受众自身不确定性评估的影响。最后,我们简要介绍了本期特刊收录的六篇研究文章。

相似文献

1
Scientific uncertainty in media content: Introduction to this special issue.媒体内容中的科学不确定性:本期特刊引言
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Nov;25(8):893-908. doi: 10.1177/0963662516670765.
2
Scientific evidence and mass media: Investigating the journalistic intention to represent scientific uncertainty.科学证据与大众媒体:探究新闻报道呈现科学不确定性的意图。
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Nov;25(8):927-943. doi: 10.1177/0963662515625479. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
3
The influence of weight-of-evidence strategies on audience perceptions of (un)certainty when media cover contested science.当媒体报道存在争议的科学时,证据权重策略对受众关于(不)确定性认知的影响。
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Nov;25(8):976-991. doi: 10.1177/0963662515615087. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
4
[To tell science. Risks, opportunities and new tools of communication.].[讲述科学。沟通的风险、机遇与新工具。]
Recenti Prog Med. 2019 Jan;110(1):11-17. doi: 10.1701/3089.30817.
5
The challenges of science journalism: The perspectives of scientists, science communication advisors and journalists from New Zealand.科学新闻的挑战:来自新西兰科学家、科学传播顾问和记者的观点。
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Apr;25(3):379-93. doi: 10.1177/0963662514556144. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
6
Behavioral neuroscience and the media.行为神经科学与媒体。
Physiol Behav. 2012 Dec 5;107(5):617-22. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.04.012. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
7
Constructing (un-)certainty: An exploration of journalistic decision-making in the reporting of neuroscience.构建(不)确定性:神经科学报道中新闻决策的探索
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Nov;25(8):909-926. doi: 10.1177/0963662516646047. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
8
From the preserves of the educated elite to virtually everywhere: A content analysis of Danish science news in 1999 and 2012.从受过教育的精英阶层的专属领域到几乎无处不在:对1999年和2012年丹麦科学新闻的内容分析。
Public Underst Sci. 2017 Feb;26(2):220-234. doi: 10.1177/0963662515603272. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
9
Rhetorical functions of a 'language of uncertainty' in the mass media.大众媒体中“不确定性语言”的修辞功能。
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Nov;25(8):961-975. doi: 10.1177/0963662515606681. Epub 2015 Oct 4.
10
Turning free speech into corporate speech: Philip Morris' efforts to influence U.S. and European journalists regarding the U.S. EPA report on secondhand smoke.将言论自由转变为企业言论:菲利普·莫里斯公司就美国环境保护局关于二手烟的报告对美国和欧洲记者施加影响的种种努力。
Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39(3):568-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Visible scientists in digital communication environments: An analysis of their role performance as public experts on Twitter/X during the Covid-19 pandemic.数字通信环境中的知名科学家:对他们在新冠疫情期间作为推特/X上的公共专家的角色表现的分析。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 May 21;34(1):9636625241249389. doi: 10.1177/09636625241249389.
2
Sustaining positive perceptions of science in the face of conflicting health information: An experimental test of messages about the process of scientific discovery.面对相互冲突的健康信息时保持对科学的积极看法:关于科学发现过程的信息的实验测试。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Oct;334:116194. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116194. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
3
In science we trust? Public trust in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projections and accepting anthropogenic climate change.
在科学中我们信任什么?公众对政府间气候变化专门委员会预测结果的信任与对人为气候变化的接受程度。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Aug;32(6):691-708. doi: 10.1177/09636625231165405. Epub 2023 May 17.
4
When scientific experts come to be media stars: An evolutionary model tested by analysing coronavirus media coverage across Italian newspapers.当科学专家成为媒体明星:通过分析意大利报纸上的冠状病毒媒体报道来检验的进化模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 26;18(4):e0284841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284841. eCollection 2023.
5
Are we bad winners? Public understandings of the United Nations' World Happiness Report among Finnish digital media and their readers.我们是糟糕的赢家吗?芬兰数字媒体及其读者对联合国《世界幸福报告》的理解。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Jan;32(1):20-39. doi: 10.1177/09636625221132380. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
Untangling Trustworthiness and Uncertainty in Science: Implications for Science Education.理清科学中的可信度与不确定性:对科学教育的启示
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(5):1155-1180. doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00322-6. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
7
Communicating scientific uncertainty in a rapidly evolving situation: a framing analysis of Canadian coverage in early days of COVID-19.在快速变化的情况下传达科学不确定性:对 COVID-19 早期加拿大报道的框架分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 29;21(1):2181. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12246-x.