Suppr超能文献

一项随机对照试验中,神经性贪食症面对面及基于互联网的认知行为疗法中退出治疗的预测因素。

Predictors of dropout in face-to-face and internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa in a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Watson Hunna J, Levine Michele D, Zerwas Stephanie C, Hamer Robert M, Crosby Ross D, Sprecher Caroline S, O'Brien Amy, Zimmer Benjamin, Hofmeier Sara M, Kordy Hans, Moessner Markus, Peat Christine M, Runfola Cristin D, Marcus Marsha D, Bulik Cynthia M

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Eating Disorders Program, Child and Adolescent Health Service, Department of Health in Western Australia, Perth, Western, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Eat Disord. 2017 May;50(5):569-577. doi: 10.1002/eat.22644. Epub 2016 Nov 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify predictors and moderators of failure to engage (i.e., pretreatment attrition) and dropout in both Internet-based and traditional face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for bulimia nervosa. We also sought to determine if Internet-based treatment reduced failure to engage and dropout.

METHOD

Participants (N = 191, 98% female) were randomized to Internet-based CBT (CBT4BN) or traditional face-to-face group CBT (CBTF2F). Sociodemographics, clinical history, eating disorder severity, comorbid psychopathology, health status and quality of life, personality and temperament, and treatment-related factors were investigated as predictors.

RESULTS

Failure to engage was associated with lower perceived treatment credibility and expectancy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.97) and body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.18). Dropout was predicted by not having a college degree (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.81), novelty seeking (HR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03), previous CBT experience (HR = 1.77; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.71), and randomization to the individual's nonpreferred treatment format (HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.28, 2.96).

DISCUSSION

Those most at risk of failure to engage had a higher BMI and perceived treatment as less credible and less likely to succeed. Dropout was associated with less education, higher novelty seeking, previous CBT experience, and a mismatch between preferred and assigned treatment. Contrary to expectations, Internet-based CBT did not reduce failure to engage or dropout. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.(Int J Eat Disord 2017; 50:569-577).

摘要

目的

我们试图确定神经性贪食症基于互联网的认知行为疗法(CBT)和传统面对面认知行为疗法中治疗参与失败(即治疗前脱落)和退出治疗的预测因素及调节因素。我们还试图确定基于互联网的治疗是否能减少治疗参与失败和退出治疗的情况。

方法

参与者(N = 191,98%为女性)被随机分配到基于互联网的CBT(CBT4BN)或传统面对面团体CBT(CBTF2F)。研究了社会人口统计学、临床病史、饮食失调严重程度、共病精神病理学、健康状况和生活质量、人格和气质以及与治疗相关的因素作为预测因素。

结果

治疗参与失败与较低的治疗可信度和期望(优势比[OR]=0.91,95%可信区间:0.82,0.97)以及体重指数(BMI)(OR = 1.10;95%可信区间:1.03,1.18)相关。未获得大学学位(风险比[HR]=0.55;95%可信区间:0.37,0.81)、寻求新奇(HR = 1.02;95%可信区间:1.01,1.03)、先前的CBT经验(HR = 1.77;95%可信区间:1.16,2.71)以及被随机分配到个人不喜欢的治疗形式(HR = 1.95,95%可信区间:1.28,2.96)可预测退出治疗。

讨论

治疗参与失败风险最高的人群BMI较高,且认为治疗可信度较低且成功可能性较小。退出治疗与教育程度较低、寻求新奇程度较高、先前的CBT经验以及偏好的治疗与分配的治疗不匹配有关。与预期相反,基于互联网的CBT并没有减少治疗参与失败或退出治疗的情况。©2016威利期刊公司(《国际进食障碍杂志》2017;50:569 - 577)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a96/5429209/960eb1c1847c/nihms824384f1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
The changing "weightscape" of bulimia nervosa.神经性贪食症的“体重景观”变化。
Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;169(10):1031-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010147.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验