Ku Elaine, McCulloch Charles E, Mauer Michael, Gitelman Stephen E, Grimes Barbara A, Hsu Chi-Yuan
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Diabetes Care. 2016 Dec;39(12):2218-2224. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0857.
To compare different blood pressure (BP) levels in their association with the risk of renal outcomes in type 1 diabetes and to determine whether an intensive glycemic control strategy modifies this association.
We included 1,441 participants with type 1 diabetes between the ages of 13 and 39 years who had previously been randomized to receive intensive versus conventional glycemic control in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT). The exposures of interest were time-updated systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) categories. Outcomes included macroalbuminuria (>300 mg/24 h) or stage III chronic kidney disease (CKD) (sustained estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m).
During a median follow-up time of 24 years, there were 84 cases of stage III CKD and 169 cases of macroalbuminuria. In adjusted models, SBP in the <120 mmHg range was associated with a 0.59 times higher risk of macroalbuminuria (95% CI 0.37-0.95) and a 0.32 times higher risk of stage III CKD (95% CI 0.14-0.75) compared with SBPs between 130 and 140 mmHg. DBP in the <70 mmHg range were associated with a 0.73 times higher risk of macroalbuminuria (95% CI 0.44-1.18) and a 0.47 times higher risk of stage III CKD (95% CI 0.21-1.05) compared with DBPs between 80 and 90 mmHg. No interaction was noted between BP and prior DCCT-assigned glycemic control strategy (all P > 0.05).
A lower BP (<120/70 mmHg) was associated with a substantially lower risk of adverse renal outcomes, regardless of the prior assigned glycemic control strategy. Interventional trials may be useful to help determine whether the currently recommended BP target of 140/90 mmHg may be too high for optimal renal protection in type 1 diabetes.
比较1型糖尿病患者不同血压水平与肾脏结局风险之间的关联,并确定强化血糖控制策略是否会改变这种关联。
我们纳入了1441名年龄在13至39岁之间的1型糖尿病患者,这些患者先前在糖尿病控制与并发症试验(DCCT)中被随机分配接受强化血糖控制或常规血糖控制。感兴趣的暴露因素是随时间更新的收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)类别。结局包括大量白蛋白尿(>300mg/24h)或III期慢性肾脏病(CKD)(持续估计肾小球滤过率<60mL/min/1.73m²)。
在中位随访时间24年期间,有84例III期CKD病例和169例大量白蛋白尿病例。在调整模型中,与收缩压在130至140mmHg之间相比,收缩压<120mmHg范围与大量白蛋白尿风险高0.59倍(95%CI 0.37 - 0.95)以及III期CKD风险高0.32倍(95%CI 0.14 - 0.75)相关。与舒张压在80至90mmHg之间相比,舒张压<70mmHg范围与大量白蛋白尿风险高0.73倍(95%CI 0.44 - 1.18)以及III期CKD风险高0.47倍(95%CI 0.21 - 1.05)相关。未观察到血压与先前DCCT分配的血糖控制策略之间存在交互作用(所有P>0.05)。
较低的血压(<120/70mmHg)与不良肾脏结局风险显著降低相关,无论先前分配的血糖控制策略如何。干预试验可能有助于确定目前推荐的140/90mmHg血压目标对于1型糖尿病的最佳肾脏保护是否可能过高。