Maynard Olivia M, Brooks Jonathan C W, Munafò Marcus R, Leonards Ute
School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU), University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Addiction. 2017 Apr;112(4):662-672. doi: 10.1111/add.13699. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
To (1) test if activation in brain regions related to reward (nucleus accumbens) and emotion (amygdala) differ when branded and plain packs of cigarettes are viewed, (2) test whether these activation patterns differ by smoking status and (3) examine whether activation patterns differ as a function of visual attention to health warning labels on cigarette packs.
Cross-sectional observational study combining functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with eye-tracking. Non-smokers, weekly smokers and daily smokers performed a memory task on branded and plain cigarette packs with pictorial health warnings presented in an event-related design.
Clinical Research and Imaging Centre, University of Bristol, UK.
Non-smokers, weekly smokers and daily smokers (n = 72) were tested. After exclusions, data from 19 non-smokers, 19 weekly smokers and 20 daily smokers were analysed.
Brain activity was assessed in whole brain analyses and in pre-specified masked analyses in the amygdala and nucleus accumbens. On-line eye-tracking during scanning recorded visual attention to health warnings.
There was no evidence for a main effect of pack type or smoking status in either the nucleus accumbens or amygdala, and this was unchanged when taking account of visual attention to health warnings. However, there was evidence for an interaction, such that we observed increased activation in the right amygdala when viewing branded as compared with plain packs among weekly smokers (P = 0.003). When taking into account visual attention to health warnings, we observed higher levels of activation in the visual cortex in response to plain packaging compared with branded packaging of cigarettes (P = 0.020).
Based on functional magnetic resonance imaging and eye-tracking data, health warnings appear to be more salient on 'plain' cigarette packs than branded packs.
(1)测试观看有品牌香烟包装和普通香烟包装时,与奖励相关的脑区(伏隔核)和与情绪相关的脑区(杏仁核)的激活情况是否存在差异;(2)测试这些激活模式是否因吸烟状况而异;(3)研究激活模式是否因对香烟包装上健康警示标签的视觉注意力不同而有所差异。
采用功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)与眼动追踪相结合的横断面观察性研究。非吸烟者、每周吸烟者和每日吸烟者在事件相关设计中,对带有图片健康警示的有品牌香烟包装和普通香烟包装执行记忆任务。
英国布里斯托大学临床研究与影像中心。
测试了非吸烟者、每周吸烟者和每日吸烟者(n = 72)。排除部分对象后,分析了19名非吸烟者、19名每周吸烟者和20名每日吸烟者的数据。
在全脑分析以及杏仁核和伏隔核的预先指定的掩蔽分析中评估脑活动。扫描过程中的在线眼动追踪记录对健康警示的视觉注意力。
在伏隔核或杏仁核中,没有证据表明包装类型或吸烟状况存在主效应,并且在考虑对健康警示的视觉注意力时,这一情况并未改变。然而,有证据表明存在交互作用,即我们观察到,与普通包装相比,每周吸烟者观看有品牌包装时右侧杏仁核的激活增加(P = 0.003)。在考虑对健康警示的视觉注意力时,我们观察到,与香烟的有品牌包装相比,普通包装引起的视觉皮层激活水平更高(P = 0.020)。
基于功能性磁共振成像和眼动追踪数据,健康警示在“普通”香烟包装上似乎比有品牌包装更显著。