Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary, and Related Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Pathology, Anatomy, and Cell Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):364-369. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002088.
We tested cytoplasmic HuR (cHuR) as a predictive marker for response to chemotherapy by examining tumor samples from the international European Study Group of Pancreatic Cancer-3 trial, in which patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) received either gemcitabine (GEM) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) adjuvant monotherapy.
Previous studies have implicated the mRNA-binding protein, HuR (ELAVL1), as a predictive marker for PDA treatment response in the adjuvant setting. These studies were, however, based on small cohorts of patients outside of a clinical trial, or a clinical trial in which patients received multimodality therapy with concomitant radiation.
Tissue samples from 379 patients with PDA enrolled in the European Study Group of Pancreatic Cancer-3 trial were immunolabeled with an anti-HuR antibody and scored for cHuR expression. Patients were dichotomized into groups of high versus low cHuR expression.
There was no association between cHuR expression and prognosis in the overall cohort [disease-free survival (DFS), P = 0.44; overall survival, P = 0.41). Median DFS for patients with high cHuR was significantly greater for patients treated with 5-FU compared to GEM [20.1 months, confidence interval (CI): 8.3-36.4 vs 10.9 months, CI: 7.5-14.2; P = 0.04]. Median DFS was similar between the treatment arms in patients with low cHuR (5-FU, 12.8 months, CI: 10.6-14.6 vs GEM, 12.9 months, CI: 11.2-15.4).
Patients with high cHuR-expressing tumors may benefit from 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy as compared to GEM, whereas those patients with low cHuR appear to have no survival advantage with GEM compared with 5-FU. Further studies are needed to validate HuR as a biomarker in both future monotherapy and multiagent regimens.
通过检测国际欧洲胰腺研究组 3 期试验中接受吉西他滨(GEM)或 5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)辅助单药治疗的可切除胰腺导管腺癌(PDA)患者的肿瘤样本,我们将细胞质 HuR(cHuR)作为化疗反应的预测标志物进行了测试。
先前的研究表明,mRNA 结合蛋白 HuR(ELAVL1)是辅助治疗中 PDA 治疗反应的预测标志物。然而,这些研究基于临床试验之外的小患者队列,或在临床试验中,患者接受了联合放疗的多模式治疗。
对来自欧洲胰腺研究组 3 期试验的 379 名 PDA 患者的组织样本进行免疫标记,并用抗 HuR 抗体进行评分,以评估 cHuR 表达。将患者分为高 cHuR 表达和低 cHuR 表达两组。
在总队列中,cHuR 表达与预后之间没有关联[无病生存期(DFS),P=0.44;总生存期,P=0.41)。高 cHuR 患者的中位 DFS 显著大于接受 5-FU 治疗的患者,而接受 GEM 治疗的患者[20.1 个月,置信区间(CI):8.3-36.4 与 10.9 个月,CI:7.5-14.2;P=0.04]。低 cHuR 患者中,5-FU 治疗组与 GEM 治疗组的中位 DFS 相似[5-FU,12.8 个月,CI:10.6-14.6 与 GEM,12.9 个月,CI:11.2-15.4]。
与 GEM 相比,高 cHuR 表达肿瘤患者可能从 5-FU 为基础的辅助治疗中获益,而低 cHuR 患者使用 GEM 与 5-FU 相比,无生存优势。需要进一步的研究来验证 HuR 作为未来单药和联合治疗方案的生物标志物。