Aspvik Nils Petter, Viken Hallgeir, Zisko Nina, Ingebrigtsen Jan Erik, Wisløff Ulrik, Stensvold Dorthe
Department of Sociology and Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
K.G. Jebsen Center of Exercise in Medicine at Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 28;11(11):e0167012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167012. eCollection 2016.
Physical activity (PA) is beneficial for general health. As a result, adults around the world are recommended to undertake regular PA of either absolute or relative intensity. Traditionally, adherence to PA recommendation is assessed by accelerometers that record absolute intensity thresholds. Since ageing often results in a decrease in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), older adults (aged > 65 years) might be more susceptible to not meeting the PA recommendation when measured in absolute terms. The aim of the present study was to compare the adherence to the PA recommendation using both absolute and relative thresholds. Additionally, we aimed to report the reference values for overall PA in a large sample of Norwegian older adults.
PA was assessed for 7 days using the Actigraph GT3X+ accelerometer in 1219 older adults (624 females) aged 70-77 years. Overall PA was measured as counts per minute (CPM) and steps. Absolute and relative moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) thresholds were applied to quantify adherence to PA recommendation. The relative MVPA thresholds were developed specifically for the Generation 100 population sample. CRF was directly measured as peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak).
Proportions meeting PA recommendation were 29% and 71% when utilizing absolute and relative MVPA, respectively. More females met the relative PA recommendation compared to males. Overall PA was higher among the youngest age group. Older adults with medium- and high levels of CRF were more physically active, compared to those with the lowest levels of CRF.
This is the first study to compare adherence to PA recommendation, using absolute and relative intensity thresholds among older adults. The present study clearly illustrates the consequences of using different methodological approaches to surveillance of PA across age, gender and CRF in a population of older adults.
身体活动(PA)对总体健康有益。因此,建议世界各地的成年人进行绝对强度或相对强度的定期身体活动。传统上,通过记录绝对强度阈值的加速度计来评估对身体活动建议的依从性。由于衰老通常会导致心肺适能(CRF)下降,以绝对值衡量时,老年人(年龄>65岁)可能更易无法达到身体活动建议。本研究的目的是比较使用绝对阈值和相对阈值对身体活动建议的依从性。此外,我们旨在报告挪威大量老年人样本中总体身体活动的参考值。
使用Actigraph GT3X+加速度计对1219名70 - 77岁的老年人(624名女性)进行了7天的身体活动评估。总体身体活动以每分钟计数(CPM)和步数来衡量。应用绝对和相对中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)阈值来量化对身体活动建议的依从性。相对MVPA阈值是专门为“百岁老人一代”人群样本制定的。心肺适能直接测量为峰值摄氧量(VO2peak)。
使用绝对MVPA和相对MVPA时,达到身体活动建议的比例分别为29%和71%。与男性相比,更多女性达到了相对身体活动建议。最年轻年龄组的总体身体活动水平更高。与心肺适能水平最低的老年人相比,心肺适能水平中等和较高的老年人身体活动更活跃。
这是第一项比较老年人使用绝对强度和相对强度阈值对身体活动建议依从性的研究。本研究清楚地说明了在老年人群中使用不同方法监测身体活动在年龄、性别和心肺适能方面的后果。