Cincin Altuğ, Tigen Kürşat, Karaahmet Tansu, Dündar Cihan, Gürel Emre, Bulut Mustafa, Sünbül Murat, Başaran Yelda
Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University; İstanbul-Turkey.
Anatol J Cardiol. 2015 Jul;15(7):536-41. doi: 10.5152/akd.2014.5538. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
The aim of this study was to explore right ventricular (RV) mechanical function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) by 2-D speckle tracking echocardiography (2-D-STE).
Forty-three patients with HCM (mean age 48, 17 females) and 40 healthy subjects were consecutively included in this cross-sectional study. The diagnosis of HCM was based on the presence of typical clinical, electrocardiographic (ECG), and echocardiographic features. Patients with LV systolic impairment, significant valvular disease, history of coronary artery disease, hypertension, malignancy, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were excluded. Right and left ventricular (LV) function was assessed by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and 2-D-STE. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients were divided into two groups according to ACC/ESC guidelines (LVOT gradient below and above 30 mm Hg). Student t-test was used to compare differences between groups. Non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U) were used in cases of abnormal distribution.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients had a significantly larger right atrium and RV diameters compared to controls. Mean pulmonary artery pressures (mPAB) were significantly higher in HCM patients (19.01±13.09 mm Hg vs. 8.40±4.50 mm Hg; p<0.001). Although RV Sm measurements were similar, RV strain measurements (-28.51±5.36% vs. -32.06±7.65%; p=0.016) were significantly lower in HCM patients. Left ventricular global longitudinal, radial, and circumferential strain values were also significantly different between the two groups (-20.50±3.58% vs. -24.12±3.40%; p<0.001, 38.18±12.67% vs. 44.80±10.15%; p=0.012, -21.94±4.28% vs. -23.91±3.95%; p=0.036 consecutively). Rotational movement of LV in each apical, mid-, and basal left ventricular segment was determined, and only mid-ventricular rotation of the HCM patients was more clockwise (-1.71±2.16 ° vs. 0.04±1.72 °; p<0.001). Although mPAP measurements were higher in HCM patients with significant LVOT obstruction (21.52±13.26 mm Hg vs. 12.31±10.53 mm Hg; p=0.049), none of the other TDI or 2-D-STE parameters was significantly different between groups.
Speckle tracking echocardiography-derived right ventricular systolic function is impaired in HCM patients when compared with healthy subjects. However, RV systolic function is not affected form LVOT obstruction and left ventricular rotation dynamics in HCM patients.
本研究旨在通过二维斑点追踪超声心动图(2-D-STE)探讨肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者的右心室(RV)机械功能。
本横断面研究连续纳入43例HCM患者(平均年龄48岁,17例女性)和40例健康受试者。HCM的诊断基于典型的临床、心电图(ECG)和超声心动图特征。排除左心室收缩功能障碍、严重瓣膜病、冠状动脉疾病史、高血压、恶性肿瘤和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者。通过组织多普勒成像(TDI)和2-D-STE评估右心室和左心室(LV)功能。根据美国心脏病学会/欧洲心脏病学会(ACC/ESC)指南,将肥厚型心肌病患者分为两组(左心室流出道压差低于和高于30 mmHg)。采用学生t检验比较组间差异。分布异常时采用非参数检验(曼-惠特尼U检验)。
与对照组相比,肥厚型心肌病患者的右心房和右心室直径明显更大。HCM患者的平均肺动脉压(mPAB)明显更高(19.01±13.09 mmHg对8.40±4.50 mmHg;p<0.001)。虽然右心室Sm测量值相似,但HCM患者的右心室应变测量值明显更低(-28.51±5.36%对-32.06±7.65%;p=0.016)。两组间左心室整体纵向、径向和圆周应变值也有显著差异(-20.50±3.58%对-24.12±3.40%;p<0.001,38.18±12.67%对44.80±10.15%;p=0.012,-21.94±4.28%对-23.91±3.95%;p=0.036)。确定左心室各心尖、中间和基底节段的左心室旋转运动,仅HCM患者的心室中部旋转更顺时针(-1.71±2.16°对0.04±1.72°;p<0.001)。虽然左心室流出道严重梗阻的HCM患者mPAP测量值更高(21.52±13.26 mmHg对12.31±10.53 mmHg;p=0.049),但两组间其他TDI或2-D-STE参数均无显著差异。
与健康受试者相比,斑点追踪超声心动图检测的肥厚型心肌病患者右心室收缩功能受损。然而,肥厚型心肌病患者的右心室收缩功能不受左心室流出道梗阻和左心室旋转动力学的影响。