• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国重症监护病房家庭满意度问卷的心理测量评估

Psychometric assessment of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit questionnaire in the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Harrison David A, Ferrando-Vivas Paloma, Wright Stephen E, McColl Elaine, Heyland Daren K, Rowan Kathryn M

机构信息

Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.

Clinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:346-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.023
PMID:27914907
Abstract

PURPOSE

To establish the psychometric properties of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit 24-item (FS-ICU-24) questionnaire in the United Kingdom.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Family-Reported Experiences Evaluation study recruited family members of patients staying at least 24 hours in 20 participating intensive care units. Questionnaires were evaluated for nonresponse, floor/ceiling effects, redundancy, and construct validity. Internal consistency was evaluated with item-to-own scale correlations and Cronbach α. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were used to explore the underlying structure.

RESULTS

Twelve thousand three hundred forty-six family members of 6380 patients were recruited and 7173 (58%) family members of 4615 patients returned a completed questionnaire. One family member per patient was included in the psychometric assessment. Six items had greater than 10% nonresponse; 1 item had a ceiling effect; and 11 items had potential redundancy. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach α, overall .96; satisfaction with care, .94; satisfaction with decision making, .93). The 2-factor solution was not a good fit. Exploratory factor analysis indicated that satisfaction with decision making encompassed 2 constructs-satisfaction with information and satisfaction with the decision-making process.

CONCLUSIONS

The Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit 24-item questionnaire demonstrated good psychometric properties in the United Kingdom setting. Construct validity could be improved by use of 3 domains and some scope for further improvement was identified.

摘要

目的

在英国建立重症监护病房家庭满意度24项问卷(FS-ICU-24)的心理测量学特性。

材料与方法

家庭报告经验评估研究招募了在20个参与研究的重症监护病房住院至少24小时的患者的家庭成员。对问卷进行了无应答、地板/天花板效应、冗余度和结构效度评估。通过项目与自身量表的相关性和Cronbach α评估内部一致性。使用验证性和探索性因素分析来探索潜在结构。

结果

招募了6380名患者的12346名家庭成员,4615名患者的7173名(58%)家庭成员返回了完整问卷。每位患者的一名家庭成员被纳入心理测量评估。6个项目的无应答率超过10%;1个项目有天花板效应;11个项目有潜在冗余。内部一致性较高(Cronbach α,总体为0.96;对护理的满意度为0.94;对决策的满意度为0.93)。双因素解决方案拟合不佳。探索性因素分析表明,对决策的满意度包含两个结构——对信息的满意度和对决策过程的满意度。

结论

重症监护病房家庭满意度24项问卷在英国环境中显示出良好的心理测量学特性。通过使用3个领域可以提高结构效度,并确定了进一步改进的一些空间。

相似文献

1
Psychometric assessment of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit questionnaire in the United Kingdom.英国重症监护病房家庭满意度问卷的心理测量评估
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:346-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
2
Psychometric validation of the Chinese patient- and family satisfaction in the intensive care unit questionnaires.中文患者和家庭在重症监护病房满意度问卷的心理计量学验证。
J Crit Care. 2019 Dec;54:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
3
Family satisfaction with critical care in the UK: a multicentre cohort study.英国重症监护的家庭满意度:一项多中心队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;9(8):e028956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028956.
4
Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient's relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index 'R-ICU'.从患者家属角度看重症监护病房的护理质量:消费者质量指数“R-ICU”的开发与心理测量学评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 24;17(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1975-4.
5
6
The family experiences of in-hospital care questionnaire in severe traumatic brain injury (FECQ-TBI): a validation study.重型颅脑损伤住院护理问卷的家庭体验(FECQ-TBI):一项效度研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 28;16(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1884-6.
7
Refinement, scoring, and validation of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) survey.重症监护病房患者家属满意度(FS-ICU)调查的完善、评分及验证
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):271-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251122.15053.50.
8
Cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chilean-Spanish version of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit - 24 questionnaire.《重症监护病房家庭满意度调查问卷-24智利西班牙语版》的文化适应性及心理测量学特性
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2023 Mar;47(3):140-148. doi: 10.1016/j.medine.2022.07.019. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
9
Psychometric properties of the Nursing Intensive Care Satisfaction Scale: A multicentre cross-sectional study.《护理重症监护满意度量表的心理测量学特性:一项多中心横断面研究》
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Jul;36(4):550-557. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
10
Scoring and psychometric properties of the Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire (EDSQ), an instrument to assess satisfaction and compliance with glaucoma treatment.《眼药满意度问卷》(EDSQ)的评分和心理测量学特性,该工具用于评估青光眼治疗的满意度和依从性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb 1;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-10-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Connecting in Crisis: Enhancing Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit Through Effective Communication in an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital.危机中的沟通:通过印度一家三级护理医院的有效沟通提高重症监护室患者家属满意度
Cureus. 2025 Apr 21;17(4):e82683. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82683. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Can the UK 24-item family satisfaction in the intensive care unit questionnaire be used to evaluate quality improvement strategies aimed at improving family satisfaction with the ICU? A qualitative study.英国重症监护病房24项家庭满意度调查问卷能否用于评估旨在提高家庭对重症监护病房满意度的质量改进策略?一项定性研究。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2020 Nov;21(4):312-319. doi: 10.1177/1751143719883563. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
3
An Assessment of Clinical and System Drivers of Family Satisfaction in the PICU.
儿科重症监护病房中影响家庭满意度的临床和系统因素评估
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;21(10):e888-e897. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002394.
4
Family satisfaction with critical care in the UK: a multicentre cohort study.英国重症监护的家庭满意度:一项多中心队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;9(8):e028956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028956.
5
Patient experience and reflective learning (PEARL): a mixed methods protocol for staff insight development in acute and intensive care medicine in the UK.患者体验与反思学习(PEARL):英国急性与重症监护医学中提升医护人员洞察力的混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 24;9(7):e030679. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030679.