Suppr超能文献

相互作用模型在药物相互作用及QT间期延长模拟中的作用

The Role of Interaction Model in Simulation of Drug Interactions and QT Prolongation.

作者信息

Wiśniowska Barbara, Polak Sebastian

机构信息

Unit of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical College, Jagiellonian University, Medyczna 9 Street, 30-688 Kraków, Poland.

Unit of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical College, Jagiellonian University, Medyczna 9 Street, 30-688 Kraków, Poland ; Simcyp (part of Certara), Blades Enterprise Centre John Street, Sheffield, S2 4SU UK.

出版信息

Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2016;2(6):339-344. doi: 10.1007/s40495-016-0075-9. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

Abstract

Computational modelling is a cornerstone of Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay and is re-increasingly being used in drug development. Electrophysiological effects of drug-drug interactions can be predicted in silico, e.g. with the use of in vitro cardiac ion channel data, PK profiles and human ventricular cardiomyocyte models. There are, however, several approaches with different assumptions used to assess the combined effect of multiple drugs, and there is no agreed standard interaction model. The aim of this study was to assess whether the choice of the drug-drug interaction (DDI) model (Bliss independence, Loewe additivity, or simple sum) influences the results of QT interval simulation trial. The Simcyp Simulator version 12.1 (Simcyp Ltd. [part of Certara], Sheffield, UK) and Cardiac Safety Simulator 2.0 (Simcyp Ltd. [part of Certara], Sheffield, UK) were used to simulate results of 8 virtual trials mimicking clinical studies and generate individual QTc data. The combined effect of inhibitory actions of drugs which were given simultaneously was calculated with use of three different interaction models. The PD effect of DDI was assessed and the differences between mean observed and mean predicted ΔQTcB values for terfenadine interactions were not statistically significant in all but one cases. Differences between the three DDI models are not statistically significant, implying that the choice of the DDI model, in the case of lack of synergy or antagonism, is irrelevant to the average predicted effect at the clinical level. However, in some cases, it can influence the verdict on combinatorial therapy safety for individual patients.

摘要

计算建模是全面体外致心律失常试验的基石,并且在药物研发中越来越多地被使用。药物相互作用的电生理效应可以在计算机上进行预测,例如通过使用体外心脏离子通道数据、药代动力学特征和人类心室心肌细胞模型。然而,有几种基于不同假设的方法用于评估多种药物的联合效应,并且没有公认的标准相互作用模型。本研究的目的是评估药物相互作用(DDI)模型(布利斯独立性、洛伊相加性或简单相加)的选择是否会影响QT间期模拟试验的结果。使用Simcyp模拟器版本12.1(Simcyp有限公司[Certara的一部分],英国谢菲尔德)和心脏安全模拟器2.0(Simcyp有限公司[Certara的一部分],英国谢菲尔德)来模拟8项模仿临床研究的虚拟试验结果并生成个体QTc数据。使用三种不同的相互作用模型计算同时给予的药物抑制作用的联合效应。评估了DDI的药效学效应,除了一个案例外,特非那定相互作用的平均观察到的和平均预测的ΔQTcB值之间的差异在所有情况下均无统计学意义。三种DDI模型之间的差异无统计学意义,这意味着在缺乏协同或拮抗作用的情况下,DDI模型的选择与临床水平的平均预测效应无关。然而,在某些情况下,它可能会影响对个体患者联合治疗安全性的判定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a436/5114317/a2d1fc791d03/40495_2016_75_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验