Suppr超能文献

健康研究群体中睾丸的剪切波弹性成像——ARFI和VTIQ技术标准值的差异

Shear wave elastography of the testes in a healthy study collective - Differences in standard values between ARFI and VTIQ techniques.

作者信息

Marcon J, Trottmann M, Rübenthaler J, Stief C G, Reiser M F, Clevert D A

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich - Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.

Department of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich - Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2016;64(4):721-728. doi: 10.3233/CH-168052.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Shear wave elastography (SWE) is a recent technique in the assessment of tissue elasticity. Different elastography techniques have been described over the years.Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging (ARFI) uses mechanical excitation of tissue to create detectable shear waves, a higher shear wave velocity being associated with an increased tissue stiffness.The Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification (VTIQ) method uses a mechanical push pulse as well, additionally creating a colour-coded map, in which tissue stiffness can be measured within a stored map on the ultrasound device after measurement.ARFI has been used in determining standard values in testes of a healthy study collective, VTIQ has already been used in the evaluation of unclear scrotal masses.Both techniques allow an operator-independent examination without application of mechanical pressure. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference between shear wave velocity values of both techniques in a healthy collective.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty patients without known testicular pathology underwent standard B-mode sonography and additional shear wave elastography in the ARFI mode as well as the VTIQ technique of both testes using the Siemens Acuson S2000™ and S3000™ ultrasound devices (Siemens HealthCare, Erlangen, Germany).Measurements of shear wave velocity were performed in the upper pole, the central portion and the lower pole separately for each testis. Values were described in m/s.Statistical evaluation was performed using paired t-test analysis.

RESULTS

We measured a mean shear wave velocity of 0.81 m/s using ARFI and 1.07 m/s with VTIQ.Shear wave velocities determined by VTIQ were all significantly higher than values gained in the ARFI mode. (p < 0.001 to p = 0.007). Values were between 0.22 and 0.29 m/s higher, when the examination was performed using VTIQ.

CONCLUSION

ARFI and VTIQ elastography modes both proved to be feasible techniques in the assessment of testicular tissue elasticity. Consideration of higher values for VTIQ is important, when different elastography measurement results are compared, especially for the application of devices in a clinical setting, e.g. in the work-up of scrotal masses.A calculable factor for a comparison between both devices is desirable, but to be further assessed in largerstudies.

摘要

引言

剪切波弹性成像(SWE)是一种用于评估组织弹性的新技术。多年来已经描述了不同的弹性成像技术。声辐射力脉冲成像(ARFI)利用对组织的机械激发来产生可检测的剪切波,较高的剪切波速度与组织硬度增加相关。虚拟触诊组织成像定量(VTIQ)方法同样使用机械推脉冲,此外还创建一个彩色编码图,在测量后可在超声设备上存储的图中测量组织硬度。ARFI已用于确定健康研究群体睾丸的标准值,VTIQ已用于评估不明阴囊肿块。这两种技术都允许在不施加机械压力的情况下进行独立于操作者的检查。本研究的目的是确定在健康群体中这两种技术的剪切波速度值之间是否存在统计学上的显著差异。

材料与方法

20名无已知睾丸病变的患者使用西门子Acuson S2000™和S3000™超声设备(德国埃尔兰根西门子医疗公司)对双侧睾丸进行标准B模式超声检查以及ARFI模式和VTIQ技术的额外剪切波弹性成像检查。分别在每个睾丸的上极、中部和下极测量剪切波速度。值以米/秒表示。使用配对t检验分析进行统计学评估。

结果

我们使用ARFI测得的平均剪切波速度为0.81米/秒,使用VTIQ测得的为1.07米/秒。VTIQ测定的剪切波速度均显著高于ARFI模式下获得的值。(p<0.001至p = 0.007)。当使用VTIQ进行检查时,值高出0.22至0.29米/秒。

结论

ARFI和VTIQ弹性成像模式在评估睾丸组织弹性方面均被证明是可行的技术。在比较不同弹性成像测量结果时,尤其是在临床环境中应用设备(例如在阴囊肿块的检查中)时,考虑VTIQ的较高值很重要。需要一个可计算的因素来比较这两种设备,但有待在更大规模的研究中进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验