Pérez-Palomares Sara, Oliván-Blázquez Bárbara, Pérez-Palomares Ana, Gaspar-Calvo Elena, Pérez-Benito Marina, López-Lapeña Elena, de la Torre-Beldarraín Maria Luisa, Magallón-Botaya Rosa
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jan;47(1):11-20. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.6698. Epub 2016 Dec 10.
Study Design Multicenter, parallel randomized clinical trial. Background Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are implicated in shoulder pain and functional limitations. An intervention intended to treat MTrPs is dry needling. Objectives To investigate the effectiveness of dry needling in addition to evidence-based personalized physical therapy treatment in the treatment of shoulder pain. Methods One hundred twenty patients with nonspecific shoulder pain were randomly allocated into 2 parallel groups: (1) personalized, evidencebased physical therapy treatment; and (2) trigger point dry needling in addition to personalized, evidence-based physical therapy treatment. Patients were assessed at baseline, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome measure was pain assessed by a visual analog scale at 3 months, and secondary variables were joint range-of-motion limitations, Constant-Murley score for pain and function, and number of active MTrPs. Clinical efficacy was assessed using intention-to-treat analysis. Results Of the 120 enrolled patients, 63 were randomly assigned to the control group and 57 to the intervention group. There were no significant differences in outcome between the 2 treatment groups. Both groups showed improvement over time. Conclusion Dry needling did not offer benefits in addition to personalized, evidencebased physical therapy treatment for patients with nonspecific shoulder pain. Level of Evidence Therapy, level 1b. Registered February 11, 2009 at www.isrctn.com (ISRCTN30907460). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(1):11-20. Epub 9 Dec 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.6698.
研究设计 多中心、平行随机临床试验。背景 肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)与肩部疼痛及功能受限有关。一种旨在治疗MTrP的干预方法是干针疗法。目的 研究在基于证据的个性化物理治疗基础上,干针疗法治疗肩部疼痛的有效性。方法 120例非特异性肩部疼痛患者被随机分为2个平行组:(1)基于证据的个性化物理治疗;(2)在基于证据的个性化物理治疗基础上进行触发点干针疗法。在基线、治疗后及3个月随访时对患者进行评估。主要结局指标是3个月时用视觉模拟量表评估的疼痛,次要变量为关节活动范围受限、Constant-Murley疼痛和功能评分以及活跃MTrP的数量。采用意向性分析评估临床疗效。结果 在120例入组患者中,63例被随机分配到对照组,57例被分配到干预组。两个治疗组的结局无显著差异。两组均随时间显示出改善。结论 对于非特异性肩部疼痛患者,在基于证据的个性化物理治疗基础上,干针疗法并无额外益处。证据等级 治疗,1b级。于2009年2月11日在www.isrctn.com注册(ISRCTN30907460)。《矫形与运动物理治疗杂志》2017年;47(1):11 - 20。2016年12月9日在线发表。doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.6698 。