a CSIR-Building & Road Research Institute , Kumasi , Ghana.
b Harborview Injury Prevention & Research Center , University of Washington , Seattle , Washington.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(3):336-342. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1581925. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
Each year, pedestrian injuries constitute over 40% of all road casualty deaths and up to 60% of all urban road casualty deaths in Ghana. This is as a result of the overwhelming dependence on walking as a mode of transport in an environment where there are high vehicular speeds and inadequate pedestrian facilities. The objectives of this research were to establish the (1) impact of traffic calming measures on vehicle speeds and (2) association between traffic calming measures and pedestrian injury severity in built-up areas in Ghana. Vehicle speeds were unobtrusively measured in 38 selected settlements, including 19 with traffic calming schemes and 19 without. The study design used in this research was a matched case-control. A regression analysis compared case and control casualties using a conditional logistic regression. Generally, the mean vehicle speeds and the proportion of vehicles exceeding the 50 km/h speed limit were significantly lower in settlements that have traffic calming measures compared to towns without any traffic calming measures. Additionally, the proportion of motorists who exceeded the speed limit was 30% or less in settlements that have traffic calming devices and the proportion who exceeded the speed limit was 60% or more in towns without any traffic calming measures. The odds of pedestrian fatality was significantly higher in settlements that have no traffic calming devices compared to those that have (odds ratio [OR] = 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-4.43). The protective effects of a traffic calming scheme that has a speed table was notably higher than those where there were no speed tables. It was clearly evident that traffic calming devices reduce vehicular speeds and, thus, the incidence and severity of pedestrian injuries in built-up areas in Ghana. However, the fact that they are deployed on arterial roads is increasingly becoming a road safety concern. Given the emerging safety challenges associated with speed calming measures, we recommend that their use be restricted to residential streets but not on arterial roads. Long-term solutions for improving pedestrian safety proposed herein include bypassing settlements along the highways to reduce pedestrians' exposure to traffic collisions and adopting a modern way of enforcement such as evidence-based laser monitoring in conjunction with a punishment regime that utilizes the demerit points system.
每年,行人受伤占加纳所有道路伤亡事故的 40%以上,占所有城市道路伤亡事故的 60%以上。这是因为在车辆速度高、行人设施不足的环境中,人们过于依赖步行作为交通方式。本研究的目的是确定(1)交通稳静化措施对车辆速度的影响,以及(2)交通稳静化措施与加纳建成区行人伤害严重程度的关系。在 38 个选定的定居点,包括 19 个有交通稳静化方案的定居点和 19 个没有交通稳静化方案的定居点,对车辆速度进行了非侵入性测量。本研究采用的研究设计是匹配病例对照。使用条件逻辑回归对病例和对照伤亡进行回归分析。
一般来说,与没有任何交通稳静化措施的城镇相比,有交通稳静化措施的城镇的平均车辆速度和超过 50km/h 限速的车辆比例显著较低。此外,在有交通稳静化装置的定居点,超过限速 30%或以下的驾车者比例以及在没有任何交通稳静化措施的城镇,超过限速 60%或以上的驾车者比例。与没有交通稳静化装置的定居点相比,没有交通稳静化装置的定居点行人死亡的几率明显更高(优势比[OR]=1.98;95%置信区间,1.09-4.43)。有速度表的交通稳静化方案的保护效果明显高于没有速度表的方案。
交通稳静化装置降低车辆速度,从而降低加纳建成区行人受伤的发生率和严重程度,这一点是显而易见的。然而,它们被部署在干道上,这越来越成为道路安全的一个关注点。鉴于与速度稳静化措施相关的新出现的安全挑战,我们建议将其使用限制在住宅区,而不是在干道上。为改善行人安全而提出的长期解决方案包括沿高速公路绕过定居点,以减少行人与交通碰撞的接触,以及采用现代执法方式,如结合基于证据的激光监测和利用扣分制度的惩罚制度。