Hanmer Janel, Kaplan Robert M
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
UCLA Department of Health Services, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):1059-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.05.019. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
The most recent reports of nationally representative health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) values for the United States used data that were collected over a decade ago.
To update these values using data from 2011, stratified by age and sex.
This study used data from two sources-the 2011 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (MEPS) and the 2011 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Both are nationally representative surveys of the US noninstitutionalized civilian population. The MEPS was used to calculate four HRQOL scores: categorical self-rated health, mental and physical component summaries from the short form-12 items (SF-12) health survey, and the health state short form-6 dimensions (SF-6D). We also estimated Quality of Well-Being Scale scores from the NHIS. We reported means and quartiles for all continuous scores, stratified by decade of age and sex.
There were 23,906 eligible subjects in the 2011 MEPS and 32,242 eligible subjects in the 2011 NHIS. All age and sex categories had instrument completion rates above 84%. Females reported lower mean scores than did males across all ages and instruments. In general, those in older age groups reported lower scores than did those in younger age groups, with the exception of the mental component summary scores from the SF-12 health survey. When compared with previous reports, these new values were generally lower than those in previous reports but rarely reached minimally important difference criteria.
This report updates US nationally representative age- and sex-stratified estimates for five HRQOL scores using data from 2011. These values are important for use in both generalized comparisons of health status and in cost-effectiveness analyses.
美国最近关于具有全国代表性的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)值的报告使用的是十多年前收集的数据。
利用2011年的数据,按年龄和性别分层更新这些值。
本研究使用了两个来源的数据——2011年医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)和2011年国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)。这两项都是对美国非机构化平民人口具有全国代表性的调查。MEPS用于计算四个HRQOL分数:分类自评健康、简短形式12项(SF - 12)健康调查的心理和身体成分总结,以及健康状态简短形式6维度(SF - 6D)。我们还从NHIS估计了幸福感量表分数。我们报告了所有连续分数的均值和四分位数,按年龄十年和性别分层。
2011年MEPS中有23906名符合条件的受试者,2011年NHIS中有32242名符合条件的受试者。所有年龄和性别类别仪器完成率均高于84%。在所有年龄组和仪器中,女性报告的平均分数低于男性。一般来说,年龄较大组的人报告的分数低于年龄较小组的人,但SF - 12健康调查的心理成分总结分数除外。与之前的报告相比,这些新值通常低于之前的报告,但很少达到最小重要差异标准。
本报告使用2011年的数据更新了美国具有全国代表性的按年龄和性别分层的五个HRQOL分数估计值。这些值对于健康状况的一般比较和成本效益分析都很重要。