• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级:随时间的变化及文献中的描述]

[ASA classification : Transition in the course of time and depiction in the literature].

作者信息

Irlbeck T, Zwißler B, Bauer A

机构信息

Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität München (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2017 Jan;66(1):5-10. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0246-4.

DOI:10.1007/s00101-016-0246-4
PMID:27995282
Abstract

The American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of physical status (ASA PS) is a widely used system for categorizing the preoperative status of patients. The ASA class is a good independent predictor of perioperative morbidity and mortality. The definitions of the ASA classes have been amended several times since 1941, resulting in inconsistent and confusing usage in the current literature. Conflicting definitions of ASA PS exist, particularly for classes III, IV and V. The high variability of individual classifications by different anesthesiologist, however, can be explained by the previous lack of examples for diagnoses. In 2014, the ASA has added a catalogue of examples for a simplified definition for classification of the ASA PS. This has so far received limited attention in German-speaking countries. This article describes the transition of the ASA classification over the past 75 years und summarizes the currently valid definitions.

摘要

美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类(ASA PS)是一种广泛用于对患者术前状况进行分类的系统。ASA分级是围手术期发病率和死亡率的良好独立预测指标。自1941年以来,ASA分级的定义已多次修订,导致当前文献中的使用不一致且令人困惑。ASA PS存在相互冲突的定义,特别是对于III、IV和V级。然而,不同麻醉医师对个体分类的高度变异性可以用之前缺乏诊断示例来解释。2014年,ASA增加了一个示例目录,用于简化ASA PS分类的定义。到目前为止,这在德语国家受到的关注有限。本文描述了过去75年中ASA分类的转变,并总结了当前有效的定义。

相似文献

1
[ASA classification : Transition in the course of time and depiction in the literature].[美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级:随时间的变化及文献中的描述]
Anaesthesist. 2017 Jan;66(1):5-10. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0246-4.
2
The American Society of Anesthesiologists' Physical Status: category V revisited.美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级:对V级的重新审视。
J Clin Anesth. 2000 Jun;12(4):328-34. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00168-9.
3
Patient-Centered Anesthesia Triage System Predicts ASA Physical Status.以患者为中心的麻醉分诊系统可预测美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Jun;124(6):1957-1962. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001712.
4
[Perioperative mortality and morbidity in the year 2000 in 502 Japanese certified anesthesia-training hospitals: with a special reference to ASA-physical status--report of the Japan Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Operating Room Safety].2000年日本502家获得认证的麻醉培训医院的围手术期死亡率和发病率:特别提及美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级——日本麻醉医师协会手术室安全委员会报告
Masui. 2002 Jan;51(1):71-85.
5
Comparison of pediatric perioperative risk assessment by ASA physical status and by NARCO-SS (neurological, airway, respiratory, cardiovascular, other-surgical severity) scores.通过美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况评分与NARCO-SS(神经、气道、呼吸、心血管、其他手术严重程度)评分对小儿围手术期风险评估的比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Mar;25(3):309-16. doi: 10.1111/pan.12588. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
6
ASA physical status assignment by non-anesthesia providers: Do surgeons consistently downgrade the ASA score preoperatively?非麻醉医师进行的 ASA 身体状况分级:外科医师是否在术前始终降低 ASA 评分?
J Clin Anesth. 2017 May;38:123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
7
[Perioperative mortality and morbidity for the year of 1999 in 466 Japanese Certified Anesthesia-training Hospitals: with special reference to ASA-physical status--report of Committee on Operating Room Safety of Japan Society of Anesthesiologists].1999年日本466家经认证的麻醉培训医院的围手术期死亡率和发病率:特别参考美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级——日本麻醉医师协会手术室安全委员会报告
Masui. 2001 Jun;50(6):678-91.
8
Variability in the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification Scale.美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类量表的变异性。
AANA J. 2003 Aug;71(4):265-74.
9
New surgical scoring system to predict postoperative mortality.预测术后死亡率的新手术评分系统。
J Anesth. 2017 Apr;31(2):198-205. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2290-2. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
10
Comparison of two preoperative indices to predict perioperative mortality in non-cardiac thoracic surgery.两种术前指标预测非心脏胸外科手术围手术期死亡率的比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997 Apr;11(4):670-5. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(97)01150-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Textbook outcomes in the laparoscopic common bile duct exploration of choledocholithiasis: a new comprehensive quality evaluation criterion.胆总管结石腹腔镜胆总管探查术的教科书式结局:一种新的综合质量评估标准
Front Surg. 2025 Aug 14;12:1623559. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1623559. eCollection 2025.
2
Effects of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and epidural analgesia on pain and blood pressure in preeclamptic women undergoing painless delivery.腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉与硬膜外镇痛对先兆子痫产妇无痛分娩时疼痛及血压的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jul 25;17(7):5679-5688. doi: 10.62347/WQTE9989. eCollection 2025.
3
Efficacy of modified pancreatic duct stent drainage during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of adding functional classification to ASA status for predicting 30-day mortality.将功能分级添加到美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级中对预测30天死亡率的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2015 Jul;121(1):110-116. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000740.
2
ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery.ASA 分级是手术术后发生医疗并发症和死亡的可靠独立预测指标。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jun;18:184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.079. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
3
[Perioperative evaluation and treatment of cardiovascular risk patients for noncardiac surgery : Guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Anaesthesiology 2014].
内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中改良胰管支架引流治疗胆总管结石的疗效
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):101295. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.101295.
4
Development and validation of nomograms for predicting the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients.预测结直肠癌患者预后的列线图的开发与验证
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Mar 30;14(3):1651-1663. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-1924. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
5
Prevalence of relevant early complications during the first 24 h on a normal ward in patients following PACU care after medium and major surgery: a monocentric retrospective observational study.PACU 后中大型手术后在普通病房的头 24 小时内相关早期并发症的发生率:一项单中心回顾性观察研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Sep 30;409(1):293. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03480-z.
6
KLF7 enhances the invasion and migration of colorectal cancer cells via the miR-139-5p/TPD52 axis.KLF7 通过 miR-139-5p/TPD52 轴增强结直肠癌细胞的侵袭和迁移。
Cancer Biol Ther. 2024 Dec 31;25(1):2385172. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2024.2385172. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
7
INTESTINAL ENDOMETRIOSIS: OUTCOMES FROM A MULTIDISCIPLINARY SPECIALIZED REFERRAL CENTER.肠子宫内膜异位症:多学科专业转诊中心的结果。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024 Jul 1;37:e1806. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720202400013e1806. eCollection 2024.
8
Risk assessment in equine anesthesia: a first evaluation of the usability, utility and predictivity of the two-part CHARIOT.马麻醉中的风险评估:对两部分式CHARIOT的可用性、实用性和预测性的首次评估。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 May 23;11:1384525. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1384525. eCollection 2024.
9
Postoperative Changes in Systemic Immune Tolerance Following Major Oncologic versus Minor Maxillofacial Surgery.大型肿瘤手术与小型颌面外科手术后全身免疫耐受的术后变化
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 25;15(15):3755. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153755.
10
Risk Factors for Neurologic Deficits in Patients With Spinal Epidural Abscess: An Analysis of One-Hundred-Forty Cases.脊柱硬膜外脓肿患者神经功能缺损的危险因素:140例病例分析
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):474-481. doi: 10.1177/21925682231194467. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
[非心脏手术心血管风险患者的围手术期评估与治疗:欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲麻醉学会2014年指南]
Anaesthesist. 2015 Apr;64(4):324-8. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-2422-3.
4
Inter-rater reliability of the ASA physical status classification in a sample of anaesthetists in Western Australia.西澳大利亚麻醉医师样本中ASA身体状况分类的评分者间信度
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2014 Sep;42(5):614-8. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1404200511.
5
2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA).2014年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲麻醉学会非心脏手术心血管评估和管理指南:非心脏手术心血管评估和管理联合工作组,由欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲麻醉学会(ESA)组成。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Sep 14;35(35):2383-431. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu282. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
6
Reliability of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice.美国麻醉医师协会身体状况量表在临床实践中的可靠性。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;113(3):424-32. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu100. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
7
What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? A population-based, multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring systems.穿孔性消化性溃疡疾病死亡率的最佳预测指标是什么?一项基于人群的多变量回归分析,包括三种临床评分系统。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jul;18(7):1261-8. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2485-5. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
8
American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status system: a multicentre Francophone study to analyse reasons for classification disagreement.美国麻醉师协会身体状况系统:一项多中心法语研究,旨在分析分类分歧的原因。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Oct;28(10):742-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328348fc9d.
9
Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery.手术心脏风险预测风险计算器的开发和验证。
Circulation. 2011 Jul 26;124(4):381-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015701. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
10
The ASA classification and peri-operative risk.美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级与围手术期风险
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Apr;93(3):185-7. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2011.93.3.185a.