Suppr超能文献

指南指导的医学治疗对射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭的疗效。

Efficacy of guideline-directed medical treatment in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction.

机构信息

Heart Failure and Structural Cardiology Ward, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116021, China.

Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, China.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Apr;10(2):1035-1042. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14199. Epub 2022 Dec 15.

Abstract

AIMS

Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) has received increasing attention following the publication of the latest ESC guidelines in 2021. However, it remains unclear whether patients with HFmrEF could benefit from guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT), referring the combination of ACEI/ARB/ARNI, β-blockers, and MRAs, which are recommended for those with reduced ejection fraction. This study explored the efficacy of GDMT in HFmrEF patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of HFmrEF patients admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University between 1 September 2015 and 30 November 2019. Propensity score matching (1:2) between patients receiving triple-drug therapy (TT) and non-triple therapy (NTT) based on age and sex was performed. The primary outcome was all cause death, cardiac death, rehospitalization from any cause, and rehospitalization due to worsening heart failure.

RESULTS

Of the 906 patients enrolled in the matched cohort (TT group, n = 302; NTT group, N = 604), 653 (72.08%) were male, and mean age was 61.1 ± 11.92. Survival analysis suggested that TT group experienced a significantly lower incidence of prespecified primary endpoints than NTT group. Multivariable Cox regression showed that TT group had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.656, 95% CI 0.447-0.961, P = 0.030), cardiac death (HR 0.599, 95% CI 0.380-0.946, P = 0.028), any-cause rehospitalization (HR 0.687, 95% CI 0.541-0.872, P = 0.002), and heart failure rehospitalization (HR 0.732, 95% CI 0.565-0.948, P = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HFmrEF, combined use of neurohormonal antagonists produces remarkable effects in reducing the occurrence of the primary outcome of rehospitalization and death. Thus, the treatment of HFmrEF should be categorized as HFrEF due to the similar benefit of neurohormonal blocking therapy in HFrEF and HFmrEF.

摘要

目的

2021 年 ESC 最新指南发布后,射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)受到越来越多的关注。然而,HFmrEF 患者是否能从指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)中获益,尚不清楚,GDMT 指的是 ACEI/ARB/ARNI、β 受体阻滞剂和 MRA 的联合使用,这些药物适用于射血分数降低的患者。本研究探讨了 GDMT 在 HFmrEF 患者中的疗效。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2015 年 9 月 1 日至 2019 年 11 月 30 日期间在大连医科大学附属第一医院住院的 HFmrEF 患者。根据年龄和性别,对接受三联药物治疗(TT)和非三联药物治疗(NTT)的患者进行倾向性评分匹配(1:2)。主要结局为全因死亡、心源性死亡、因任何原因再住院和因心力衰竭恶化再住院。

结果

在纳入匹配队列的 906 例患者中(TT 组 n=302;NTT 组 n=604),653 例(72.08%)为男性,平均年龄为 61.1±11.92 岁。生存分析表明,TT 组患者预设主要终点的发生率明显低于 NTT 组。多变量 Cox 回归显示,TT 组的全因死亡率风险较低(HR 0.656,95%CI 0.447-0.961,P=0.030)、心源性死亡率风险较低(HR 0.599,95%CI 0.380-0.946,P=0.028)、因任何原因再住院风险较低(HR 0.687,95%CI 0.541-0.872,P=0.002)和心力衰竭再住院风险较低(HR 0.732,95%CI 0.565-0.948,P=0.018)。

结论

在 HFmrEF 患者中,联合使用神经激素拮抗剂可显著降低再住院和死亡的主要结局发生。因此,HFmrEF 的治疗应归类为 HFrEF,因为在 HFrEF 和 HFmrEF 中,神经激素阻断治疗的获益相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8d1/10053349/d20c20bba25c/EHF2-10-1035-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验