La Spina Carlo, Carnevali Adriano, Marchese Alessandro, Querques Giuseppe, Bandello Francesco
*Department of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; and †Department of Ophthalmology, University of "Magna Graecia," Catanzaro, Italy.
Retina. 2017 Sep;37(9):1636-1641. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001426.
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) allows delineating the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) easily and noninvasively. The present study aims to test reproducibility and reliability of FAZ evaluation by means of OCTA in different settings.
Twenty-four eyes of 24 normal subjects were investigated using AngioVue OCTA Imaging System. A series of OCTA acquisitions were taken both in basal and in different experimental settings after vasoactive stimuli. Images were evaluated separately by two operators and FAZ area was measured both manually and using the built-in automated measurement tool.
No differences for FAZ area were found in the repetition of basal acquisitions, neither in manual nor in automated measurement (0.215 ± 0.06 vs. 0.216 ± 0.07, and 0.268 ± 0.05 vs. 0.264 ± 0.09, first vs. second basal measurement in square millimetres for manual and automated evaluation, P = 0.25 and P = 0.35, respectively). Interoperators correlation was optimal (r = 0.978 [95% CI 0.981-0.976]). No differences were found among the other settings, which included first basal and then repeated (second) in the morning, after flickering light stimulus, after a Bruce treadmill stress test, after 30 minutes dark adaptation, and basal in the evening, neither in automated nor in manual measurements. Automated measurements for nonflow areas provided significantly larger diameters than manual ones.
AngioVue OCTA Imaging System produces highly reproducible FAZ images with a high interoperators concordance level. Optical coherence tomography angiography capability to detect FAZ area seems not to be influenced by any of the vasoactive stimuli considered in the current study. Nonflow areas seem to be larger when measured automatically than manually.
光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)能够轻松、无创地描绘出黄斑无血管区(FAZ)。本研究旨在测试在不同情况下通过OCTA评估FAZ的可重复性和可靠性。
使用AngioVue OCTA成像系统对24名正常受试者的24只眼睛进行研究。在基础状态以及血管活性刺激后的不同实验情况下进行了一系列OCTA采集。图像由两名操作人员分别评估,FAZ面积通过手动和使用内置自动测量工具进行测量。
基础采集重复时,无论是手动测量还是自动测量,FAZ面积均无差异(手动评估时,首次与第二次基础测量的平方毫米数分别为0.215±0.06与0.216±0.07,自动评估时为0.268±0.05与0.264±0.09,P分别为0.25和0.35)。操作人员之间的相关性最佳(r = 0.978[95%CI 0.981 - 0.976])。在其他情况下,包括早晨首次基础测量然后重复(第二次)、闪烁光刺激后、Bruce跑步机压力测试后、30分钟暗适应后以及晚上基础测量,无论是自动测量还是手动测量,均未发现差异。非血流区域的自动测量直径比手动测量的显著更大。
AngioVue OCTA成像系统可产生具有高度可重复性的FAZ图像,操作人员之间的一致性水平很高。光学相干断层扫描血管造影检测FAZ面积的能力似乎不受本研究中考虑的任何血管活性刺激的影响。非血流区域自动测量时似乎比手动测量时更大。