Benditz Achim, Boluki Daniel, Weber Markus, Zeman Florian, Grifka Joachim, Völlner Florian
Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Bad Abbach/Regensburg, Germany.
Center for Clinical Studies, University Medical Center Regensburg, Germany.
Rofo. 2017 Mar;189(3):233-239. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-120112. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
To investigate the influence of sacral slope on the correlation between measurements of lumbar lordosis obtained by standing radiographs and magnetic resonance images in supine position (MRI). Little information is available on the correlation between measurements of lumbar lordosis obtained by radiographic and MR images. Most relevant studies have shown correlations for the thoracic spine, but detailed analyses on the lumbar spine are lacking. MR images and standing lateral radiographs of 63 patients without actual low back pain or radiographic pathologies of the lumbar spine were analyzed. Standing radiographic measurements included the sagittal parameters pelvic incidence (PI) pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS); MR images were used to additionally measure lumbar L1-S1 lordosis and single level lordosis. Differences between radiographic and MRI measurements were analyzed and divided into 4 subgroups of different sacral slope according to Roussouly's classification. Global lumbar lordosis (L1-S1) was 44.99° (± 10 754) on radiographs and 47.91° (± 9.170) on MRI, yielding a clinically relevant correlation (r = 0.61, p < 0.01). Measurements of single level lordosis only showed minor differences. At all levels except for L5 / S1, lordosis measured by means of standing radiographs was higher than that measured by MRI. The difference in global lumbar L1-S1 lordosis was -2.9°. Analysis of the Roussouly groups showed the largest difference for L1-S1 (-8.3°) in group 2. In group 4, when measured on MRI, L5 / S1 lordosis (25.71°) was lower than L4 / L5 lordosis (27.63°) compared to the other groups. Although measurements of global lumbar lordosis significantly differed between the two scanning technologies, the mean difference was just 2.9°. MRI in supine position may be used for estimating global lumbar lordosis, but single level lordosis should be determined by means of standing radiographs. · Large difference between radiographic and MRI measurements of level L5 / S1.. · MRI can be used for estimating global lumbar lordosis.. · Analysis of single level lordosis necessitates measurement in standing radiographs.. · Benditz A, Boluki D, Weber M et al. Comparison of Lumbar Lordosis in Lateral Radiographs in Standing Position with supine MR Imaging in consideration of the Sacral Slope. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 233 - 239.
为研究骶骨斜率对仰卧位磁共振成像(MRI)与站立位X线片测量腰椎前凸相关性的影响。关于X线片与MRI测量腰椎前凸的相关性,目前可用信息较少。大多数相关研究显示了胸椎的相关性,但缺乏对腰椎的详细分析。分析了63例无实际腰痛或腰椎X线片病变患者的MRI图像和站立位侧位X线片。站立位X线片测量包括矢状面参数骨盆入射角(PI)、骨盆倾斜角(PT)和骶骨斜率(SS);MRI图像用于额外测量腰椎L1-S1前凸和单节段前凸。分析X线片和MRI测量之间的差异,并根据Roussouly分类将其分为4个不同骶骨斜率的亚组。站立位X线片上的整体腰椎前凸(L1-S1)为44.99°(±10.754),MRI上为47.91°(±9.170),具有临床相关的相关性(r = 0.61,p < 0.01)。单节段前凸测量仅显示微小差异。除L5/S1外,所有节段站立位X线片测量的前凸均高于MRI测量值。整体腰椎L1-S1前凸的差异为-2.9°。对Roussouly组的分析显示,第2组中L1-S1的差异最大(-8.3°)。在第4组中,与其他组相比,MRI测量时L5/S1前凸(25.71°)低于L4/L5前凸(27.63°)。尽管两种扫描技术测量的整体腰椎前凸存在显著差异,但平均差异仅为2.9°。仰卧位MRI可用于估计整体腰椎前凸,但单节段前凸应通过站立位X线片确定。·L5/S1节段X线片和MRI测量差异较大。·MRI可用于估计整体腰椎前凸。·单节段前凸分析需要在站立位X线片上测量。·Benditz A,Boluki D,Weber M等。考虑骶骨斜率的站立位侧位X线片与仰卧位MRI腰椎前凸的比较。Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017;189:233 - 239。