Braitmayer Kathrin, Dereskewitz Caroline, Oberhauser Cornelia, Rudolf Klaus-Dieter, Coenen Michaela
Chair for Public Health and Health Services Research, Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology-IBE, Research Unit for Biopsychosocial Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Marchioninistr. 17, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Department of Hand Surgery, Plastic- and Microsurgery, BG Hospital Hamburg, Bergedorfer Straße 10, 21033, Hamburg, Germany.
Patient. 2017 Jun;10(3):367-376. doi: 10.1007/s40271-016-0212-x.
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire is the most commonly applied patient-reported outcome measure used to assess disability and functioning in clinical research and practice for patients with injuries and diseases of the upper extremities. The objective of this study was to assess whether the DASH is a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure disability and functioning in patients with hand injuries and diseases using Rasch analysis.
We performed a psychometric study using data derived from two multicentre studies carried out to develop the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for Hand Conditions. We analysed the data of 417 patients recruited in a clinical setting and suffering from hand injuries (e.g. finger fracture, flexor tendon injury) or diseases (e.g. carpal tunnel syndrome, rhizarthrosis). We examined whether the DASH fulfilled the assumptions for its use as a measure by applying a partial credit model and testing for differential item functioning for sex and age.
Bifactor analysis revealed problems with the underlying latent trait of functioning and disability. Rasch analysis raised further issues, including disordered thresholds for eight items and misfit in nine items. One item showed Differential Item Functioning for sex.
The study reveals that some DASH items do not fit the underlying trait that the DASH aims to measure. Further studies using Rasch analysis are needed to compare our findings with results of studies involving other target groups (e.g. patients with injuries of the upper arm and shoulder).
上肢功能障碍、肩部与手部功能障碍问卷(DASH问卷)是临床研究和实践中最常用的患者报告结局指标,用于评估上肢损伤和疾病患者的残疾情况及功能。本研究的目的是使用拉施分析评估DASH问卷对于测量手部损伤和疾病患者的残疾情况及功能是否为有效且可靠的问卷。
我们进行了一项心理测量学研究,使用的数据来自两项多中心研究,这两项研究旨在制定手部疾病的国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)核心集。我们分析了417名在临床环境中招募的患者的数据,这些患者患有手部损伤(如手指骨折、屈肌腱损伤)或疾病(如腕管综合征、类风湿性关节炎)。我们通过应用部分计分模型并测试性别和年龄的项目功能差异,来检验DASH问卷是否满足其作为一种测量工具的假设。
双因素分析揭示了功能和残疾潜在特质方面的问题。拉施分析提出了更多问题,包括八个项目的阈值无序以及九个项目的拟合不佳。一个项目显示出性别方面的项目功能差异。
该研究表明,一些DASH问卷项目不符合DASH问卷旨在测量的潜在特质。需要使用拉施分析进行进一步研究,以将我们的研究结果与涉及其他目标群体(如上臂和肩部损伤患者)的研究结果进行比较。