Suppr超能文献

pH监测在嗓音障碍的喉咽反流患者中的作用。

Role of PH Monitoring in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients with Voice Disorders.

作者信息

Maldhure Swati, Chandrasekharan Ramanathan, Dutta Amit-Kumar, Chacko Ashok, Kurien Mary

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Padhar Hospital, Padhar, Dist Betul, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India.

出版信息

Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;28(89):377-383.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is considered an important cause of voice disorder. We aimed to determine the frequency of LPR in patients with voice disorder and the association between Koufman Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and proximal acid reflux in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective study in patients aged more than 18 years presenting at the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) clinic with a change in voice lasting more than 3 weeks. All patients underwent nasopharyngolaryngoscopy and a dual-probe esophageal pH study. LPR was diagnosed by a Koufman RSI of >13 and/or RFS of >7. GERD was diagnosed according to a DeMeester Johnson score of >14.7. Proximal acid reflux was diagnosed if acid exposure time was >0.02% in a proximal pH probe.

RESULTS

The study included 30 patients with a voice disorder. The mean age of participants was 38.5 years and 40% of patients were female. Using either of the two criteria, LPR was present in 46.7% of patients, half of whom had GERD. Among the remaining 53.3% patients with a voice disorder and no evidence of LPR, GERD was present in 25%. There was no significant association between the presence of LPR based on RSI (P=1) and GERD or RFS and GERD (P=0.06). Proximal acid reflux was present in only 10% patients with a voice disorder, and there was no significant association of this test with RFS (P=1) or RSI (P=1).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of the patients with a voice disorder have LPR, and only a subset of these patients have evidence of GERD. Fiberoptic laryngoscopic findings (RFS) complementing RSI appears to be important in diagnosing possible reflux etiology in voice disorders and can be an indicator for instituting anti-reflux therapy. However, there is no significant association between RSI, RFS, and GERD suggesting that these tests evaluate different features of the disease. Proximal acid reflux is uncommon in patients with voice disorder based on current measurement criteria. Acid exposure time as measured in the proximal probe of a 24-hour dual pH probe may need to be re-evaluated as one of the diagnostic criteria for LPR.

摘要

引言

喉咽反流(LPR)被认为是嗓音障碍的一个重要原因。我们旨在确定嗓音障碍患者中LPR的发生率,以及这些患者的科夫曼反流症状指数(RSI)、反流发现评分(RFS)、胃食管反流病(GERD)和近端酸反流之间的关联。

材料与方法

我们对年龄超过18岁、因嗓音改变持续超过3周而到耳鼻喉科(ENT)门诊就诊的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。所有患者均接受了鼻咽喉镜检查和双探头食管pH值研究。LPR的诊断标准为科夫曼RSI>13和/或RFS>7。GERD根据DeMeester Johnson评分>14.7进行诊断。如果近端pH探头的酸暴露时间>0.02%,则诊断为近端酸反流。

结果

该研究纳入了30例嗓音障碍患者。参与者的平均年龄为38.5岁,40%的患者为女性。采用这两种标准中的任何一种,46.7%的患者存在LPR,其中一半患者患有GERD。在其余53.3%的嗓音障碍且无LPR证据的患者中,25%的患者患有GERD。基于RSI的LPR存在情况与GERD之间无显著关联(P=1),RFS与GERD之间也无显著关联(P=0.06)。仅有10%的嗓音障碍患者存在近端酸反流,该检测与RFS(P=1)或RSI(P=1)之间无显著关联。

结论

大约一半的嗓音障碍患者存在LPR,且这些患者中只有一部分有GERD的证据。纤维喉镜检查结果(RFS)与RSI相结合在诊断嗓音障碍可能的反流病因方面似乎很重要,并且可以作为实施抗反流治疗的一个指标。然而,RSI、RFS和GERD之间无显著关联,这表明这些检测评估的是该疾病的不同特征。根据目前测量标准,近端酸反流在嗓音障碍患者中并不常见。24小时双pH探头近端探头测量的酸暴露时间可能需要重新评估作为LPR的诊断标准之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1604/5168568/87c25cecb931/ijo-28-377-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验