Scerbo Mark W, Britt Rebecca C, Montano Michael, Kennedy Rebecca A, Prytz Erik, Stefanidis Dimitrios
Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA.
Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA.
Surgery. 2017 May;161(5):1209-1214. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
The effects of refraining from practice for different intervals on laparoscopic suturing and mental workload was assessed with a secondary task developed by the authors. We expected the inability to practice to produce a decrease in performance on the suturing, knot tying, and secondary task and skills to rebound after a single refresher session.
In total, 22 surgical assistant and premedical students trained to Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery proficiency in intracorporeal suturing and knot tying were assessed on that task using a secondary task. Participants refrained from practicing any Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery tasks for 1 or 5 months. At the time of their return, they were assessed immediately on suturing and knot tying with the secondary task, practiced suturing and knot tying for 40 minutes, and then were reassessed.
The mean suture times from the initial reassessment were greater than the proficiency times but returned to proficiency levels after one practice session, F(2, 40) = 14.5, P < .001, partial η = .420. Secondary task scores mirrored the results of suturing time, F(2, 40) = 6.128, P < .005, partial η = .235, and were moderated by retention interval.
When participants who reached proficiency in suturing and knot tying were reassessed after either 1or 5 months without practice, their performance times increased by 35% and secondary task scores decreased by 30%. These deficits, however, were nearly reversed after a single refresher session.
作者开发了一项次要任务,以评估不同间隔时间不进行练习对腹腔镜缝合和心理负荷的影响。我们预计无法练习会导致缝合、打结及次要任务的表现下降,且在单次复习课程后技能会反弹。
共有22名接受过腹腔镜手术基础技能培训且在体内缝合和打结方面达到熟练水平的外科助理和医学预科学生,使用一项次要任务对其进行该任务评估。参与者停止练习任何腹腔镜手术基础任务1个月或5个月。在他们回归时,立即使用次要任务对其缝合和打结能力进行评估,练习缝合和打结40分钟,然后再次进行评估。
初次重新评估时的平均缝合时间长于熟练水平时间,但在一次练习课程后恢复到熟练水平,F(2, 40) = 14.5,P <.001,偏η = 0.420。次要任务得分反映了缝合时间的结果,F(2, 40) = 6.128,P <.005,偏η = 0.235,且受保留间隔的影响。
当在未练习1个月或5个月后对达到缝合和打结熟练水平的参与者进行重新评估时,他们的表现时间增加了35%,次要任务得分下降了30%。然而,在单次复习课程后,这些缺陷几乎得到了逆转。