Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Feb;24(2):118-125. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16686553. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
Introduction In 2009, the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine (MAST) was developed within the MethoTelemed project as a framework for description of the effectiveness of telemedicine applications. The goal was for the assessments to be used as basis for decision-making in healthcare systems. Since then, MAST has been used in many European telemedicine studies and is now the most widely used model for assessment of telemedicine. The aim of this study was to assess the face validity of MAST. Methods A modified Delphi process was carried out and included a workshop with a sample of healthcare decision makers. A total of 56 decision makers and experts in telemedicine were invited and 19 persons participated in the two Delphi rounds. Thirteen hospitals or regional health authorities from 12 European countries and six research organisations were represented in the final sample. The participants were asked to assess the importance of the different domains and topics in MAST on a 0-3 Likert scale. Results All respondents completed the two rounds. Based on the answers, the face validity of all MAST domains was confirmed, since all domains were considered moderately or highly important by more than 80% of the respondents. Discussion Even though the study confirmed the validity of MAST, a number of supplements and improvements regarding study design and data collection were suggested. When considering the results it should be noticed that the sample size was small and larger studies are needed to confirm the results.
简介
2009 年,在 MethoTelemed 项目中开发了模型评估远程医疗(MAST),作为描述远程医疗应用效果的框架。其目标是将评估作为医疗保健系统决策的基础。从那时起,MAST 已在许多欧洲远程医疗研究中使用,现在是评估远程医疗最广泛使用的模型。本研究旨在评估 MAST 的表面有效性。
方法
采用改良德尔菲法进行,包括对一组医疗保健决策者的研讨会。共邀请了 56 名决策者和远程医疗专家,19 人参加了两轮德尔菲调查。最终样本来自欧洲 12 个国家的 13 家医院或区域卫生当局和 6 个研究机构。参与者被要求在 0-3 的李克特量表上评估 MAST 不同领域和主题的重要性。
结果
所有受访者都完成了两轮调查。根据答案,MAST 的所有领域的表面有效性都得到了确认,因为所有领域都被超过 80%的受访者认为是中度或高度重要的。
讨论
尽管该研究证实了 MAST 的有效性,但在研究设计和数据收集方面提出了一些补充和改进建议。在考虑结果时,应该注意到样本量较小,需要进行更大规模的研究来验证结果。