• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远程医疗评估模型的有效性:德尔菲研究。

Validity of the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine: A Delphi study.

机构信息

Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Feb;24(2):118-125. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16686553. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1177/1357633X16686553
PMID:28024442
Abstract

Introduction In 2009, the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine (MAST) was developed within the MethoTelemed project as a framework for description of the effectiveness of telemedicine applications. The goal was for the assessments to be used as basis for decision-making in healthcare systems. Since then, MAST has been used in many European telemedicine studies and is now the most widely used model for assessment of telemedicine. The aim of this study was to assess the face validity of MAST. Methods A modified Delphi process was carried out and included a workshop with a sample of healthcare decision makers. A total of 56 decision makers and experts in telemedicine were invited and 19 persons participated in the two Delphi rounds. Thirteen hospitals or regional health authorities from 12 European countries and six research organisations were represented in the final sample. The participants were asked to assess the importance of the different domains and topics in MAST on a 0-3 Likert scale. Results All respondents completed the two rounds. Based on the answers, the face validity of all MAST domains was confirmed, since all domains were considered moderately or highly important by more than 80% of the respondents. Discussion Even though the study confirmed the validity of MAST, a number of supplements and improvements regarding study design and data collection were suggested. When considering the results it should be noticed that the sample size was small and larger studies are needed to confirm the results.

摘要

简介

2009 年,在 MethoTelemed 项目中开发了模型评估远程医疗(MAST),作为描述远程医疗应用效果的框架。其目标是将评估作为医疗保健系统决策的基础。从那时起,MAST 已在许多欧洲远程医疗研究中使用,现在是评估远程医疗最广泛使用的模型。本研究旨在评估 MAST 的表面有效性。

方法

采用改良德尔菲法进行,包括对一组医疗保健决策者的研讨会。共邀请了 56 名决策者和远程医疗专家,19 人参加了两轮德尔菲调查。最终样本来自欧洲 12 个国家的 13 家医院或区域卫生当局和 6 个研究机构。参与者被要求在 0-3 的李克特量表上评估 MAST 不同领域和主题的重要性。

结果

所有受访者都完成了两轮调查。根据答案,MAST 的所有领域的表面有效性都得到了确认,因为所有领域都被超过 80%的受访者认为是中度或高度重要的。

讨论

尽管该研究证实了 MAST 的有效性,但在研究设计和数据收集方面提出了一些补充和改进建议。在考虑结果时,应该注意到样本量较小,需要进行更大规模的研究来验证结果。

相似文献

1
Validity of the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine: A Delphi study.远程医疗评估模型的有效性:德尔菲研究。
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Feb;24(2):118-125. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16686553. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
2
A model for assessment of telemedicine applications: mast.远程医疗应用评估模型: Mast。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jan;28(1):44-51. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000638.
3
Assessment of Competence in EVAR Procedures: A Novel Rating Scale Developed by the Delphi Technique.腔内血管修复术(EVAR)操作能力评估:一种通过德尔菲技术开发的新型评分量表。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jul;54(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 23.
4
ASSESSMENT OF MAST IN EUROPEAN PATIENT-CENTERED TELEMEDICINE PILOTS.欧洲以患者为中心的远程医疗试点中的MAST评估
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015 Jan;31(5):304-11. doi: 10.1017/S0266462315000574. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
5
Stakeholders' resistance to telemedicine with focus on physicians: Utilizing the Delphi technique.利益相关者对以医生为重点的远程医疗的抵制:利用德尔菲技术。
J Telemed Telecare. 2019 Jul;25(6):378-385. doi: 10.1177/1357633X18775853. Epub 2018 May 23.
6
Study quality and evidence of benefit in recent assessments of telemedicine.远程医疗近期评估中的研究质量与获益证据。
J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10(6):318-24. doi: 10.1258/1357633042602053.
7
The value of an evaluation framework for telehealth initiatives.远程医疗计划评估框架的价值。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 1999;64:39-45.
8
Moving Forward Through Consensus: A Modified Delphi Approach to Determine the Top Research Priorities in Orthopaedic Oncology.通过共识推进:一种改进的德尔菲法确定骨肿瘤学的首要研究重点
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):3044-3055. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5482-7. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
9
The Diabetes Evaluation Framework for Innovative National Evaluations (DEFINE): Construct and Content Validation Using a Modified Delphi Method.用于创新国家评估的糖尿病评估框架 (DEFINE):使用改良 Delphi 法进行构建和内容验证。
Can J Diabetes. 2017 Jun;41(3):281-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.10.011. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
10
Identifying children's health care quality measures for Medicaid and CHIP: an evidence-informed, publicly transparent expert process.确定医疗补助和儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)的儿童保健质量措施:基于证据、公开透明的专家流程。
Acad Pediatr. 2011 May-Jun;11(3 Suppl):S11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.11.003.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of frameworks evaluating digital health applications.一项关于评估数字健康应用程序的框架的范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;11:20552076251315297. doi: 10.1177/20552076251315297. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Optimizing Telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for Enhanced TeleHealth and Digital Healthcare Outcomes (Telemechron Study).优化远程医疗:利用关键绩效指标提升远程医疗和数字医疗成果(Telemechron研究)。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 1;12(13):1319. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131319.
3
Investigating Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patient-Centered Diabetes Specialist Outpatient Care (DigiDiaS): Protocol for a Multimethod Prospective Observational Study.
以患者为中心的糖尿病专科门诊护理中数字患者报告结局指标的研究(DigiDiaS):一项多方法前瞻性观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 5;13:e52766. doi: 10.2196/52766.
4
Auditing the Audits: A Systematic Review on Different Procedures in Telemedicine.审核审核:远程医疗中不同程序的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;20(5):4484. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054484.
5
Measuring the Success of a Project ECHO Implementation: Results from an International e-Delphi Study.衡量项目ECHO实施的成效:一项国际电子德尔菲研究的结果
Glob Implement Res Appl. 2022;2(3):179-194. doi: 10.1007/s43477-022-00050-7. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
6
[The Importance of Quality Methodological Tools in Telemedicine and COVID-19: The Model for Assessment of Telemedicine (MAST)].[质量方法工具在远程医疗和 COVID-19 中的重要性:远程医疗评估模型(MAST)]
Arch Bronconeumol. 2021 Jan;57:3-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
7
Assessing Face Validity of the HexCom Model for Capturing Complexity in Clinical Practice: A Delphi Study.评估用于捕捉临床实践复杂性的HexCom模型的表面效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Feb 4;9(2):165. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020165.
8
Online Guide for Electronic Health Evaluation Approaches: Systematic Scoping Review and Concept Mapping Study.在线电子健康评估方法指南:系统范围综述和概念映射研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 12;22(8):e17774. doi: 10.2196/17774.
9
The Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of the Norwegian Version.服务使用者技术可接受性问卷:挪威语版本的心理测量评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Dec 21;5(4):e10255. doi: 10.2196/10255.