• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生与老年结直肠癌或胰腺癌患者最佳治疗决策的关键要素:一项定性研究

Key elements of optimal treatment decision-making for surgeons and older patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Geessink Noralie H, Schoon Yvonne, van Herk Hanneke C P, van Goor Harry, Olde Rikkert Marcel G M

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Geriatrics, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):473-479. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.013
PMID:28029569
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify key elements of optimal treatment decision-making for surgeons and older patients with colorectal (CRC) or pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

Six focus groups with different participants were performed: three with older CRC/PC patients and relatives, and three with physicians. Supplementary in-depth interviews were conducted in another seven patients. Framework analysis was used to identify key elements in decision-making.

RESULTS

23 physicians, 22 patients and 14 relatives participated. Three interacting components were revealed: preconditions, content and facilitators of decision-making. To provide optimal information about treatments' impact on an older patient's daily life, physicians should obtain an overall picture and take into account patients' frailty. Depending on patients' preferences and capacities, dividing decision-making into more sessions will be helpful and simultaneously emphasize patients' own responsibility. GPs may have a valuable contribution because of their background knowledge and supportive role.

CONCLUSION

Stakeholders identified several crucial elements in the complex surgical decision-making of older CRC/PC patients. Structured qualitative research may also be of great help in optimizing other treatment directed decision-making processes.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Surgeons should be trained in examining preconditions and useful facilitators in decision-making in older CRC/PC patients to optimize its content and to improve the quality of shared care.

摘要

目的

确定针对患有结直肠癌(CRC)或胰腺癌(PC)的外科医生和老年患者进行最佳治疗决策的关键要素。

方法

开展了六个针对不同参与者的焦点小组:三个小组由老年CRC/PC患者及其亲属组成,另外三个小组由医生组成。还对另外七名患者进行了补充深入访谈。采用框架分析法确定决策中的关键要素。

结果

23名医生、22名患者和14名亲属参与其中。揭示了三个相互作用的组成部分:决策的前提条件、内容和促进因素。为了提供有关治疗对老年患者日常生活影响的最佳信息,医生应全面了解情况并考虑患者的虚弱状况。根据患者的偏好和能力,将决策分成更多阶段会有所帮助,同时强调患者自身的责任。全科医生因其背景知识和支持作用可能会做出宝贵贡献。

结论

利益相关者确定了老年CRC/PC患者复杂手术决策中的几个关键要素。结构化定性研究在优化其他治疗导向的决策过程中也可能有很大帮助。

实践意义

应对外科医生进行培训,使其能够审视老年CRC/PC患者决策中的前提条件和有用促进因素,以优化决策内容并提高共享医疗的质量。

相似文献

1
Key elements of optimal treatment decision-making for surgeons and older patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer: A qualitative study.外科医生与老年结直肠癌或胰腺癌患者最佳治疗决策的关键要素:一项定性研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):473-479. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
2
Shared decision-making in older patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer: Determinants of patients' and observers' perceptions.老年结直肠癌或胰腺癌患者的共同决策:患者和观察者感知的决定因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Oct;101(10):1767-1774. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
3
The ethics of responsibility and ownership in decision-making about treatment for breast cancer: triangulation of consultation with patient and surgeon perspectives.在乳腺癌治疗决策中的责任和所有权伦理:患者和外科医生观点咨询的三角测量。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jun;70(12):1904-1911. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.039. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
4
Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.实际和期望的决策角色与患者报告的护理质量的关联:癌症护理中的共同决策。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112.
5
[Physician perspectives on the impact of patient preferences and the role of next-of-kin of patients in evidence-based decision-making: A qualitative interview study from oncology].[医生对患者偏好的影响以及患者近亲在循证决策中的作用的看法:一项肿瘤学定性访谈研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Apr;131-132:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
6
Surgical Consultation as Social Process: Implications for Shared Decision Making.外科会诊的社会过程:对共同决策的影响。
Ann Surg. 2019 Mar;269(3):446-452. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002610.
7
Barriers and facilitators of healthcare professionals in integrating shared decision-making in pancreatic cancer treatment: A network approach.医疗专业人员在胰腺癌治疗中整合共享决策的障碍和促进因素:网络方法。
Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(19):e70218. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70218.
8
What perceptions do patients have of decision making (DM)? Toward an integrative patient-centered care model. A qualitative study using focus-group interviews.患者对决策制定(DM)有何看法?迈向以患者为中心的综合护理模式。使用焦点小组访谈的定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 May;87(2):206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.010. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
9
'One also needs a bit of trust in the doctor ... ': a qualitative interview study with pancreatic cancer patients about their perceptions and views on information and treatment decision-making.“人们也需要对医生有一点信任……”:一项关于胰腺癌患者对信息和治疗决策的看法和认知的定性访谈研究。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2444-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt193. Epub 2013 May 22.
10
Perspectives of Medical Specialists on Sharing Decisions in Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study Concerning Chemotherapy Decisions With Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma.医学专家对癌症治疗中共同决策的看法:一项关于复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者化疗决策的定性研究
Oncologist. 2015 Oct;20(10):1182-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0095. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors impacting informed decision-making for patients with pancreatic cancer: a qualitative study.影响胰腺癌患者知情决策的因素:一项定性研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 30;33(9):825. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09878-9.
2
From Burden to Empowerment. Patient-Reported Influencing Factors on Participation in Shared Decision Making in Oncology, a Meta-Study.从负担到赋权:患者报告的肿瘤学共同决策参与影响因素的元研究
Psychooncology. 2025 Jul;34(7):e70218. doi: 10.1002/pon.70218.
3
Analysis of Influencing Factors and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making Among Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Qualitative Studies.
胃肠癌患者实施共同决策的影响因素及策略分析:定性研究的系统评价与Meta分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17317-6.
4
The psychosocial impact of pancreatic cancer on caregivers: a scoping review.胰腺癌对护理人员的社会心理影响:一项范围综述。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 20;25(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13891-w.
5
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in older patients with rectal cancer guided by comprehensive geriatric assessment within a multidisciplinary team-a multicenter phase II trial.多学科团队综合老年评估指导下的老年直肠癌患者术前放化疗:一项多中心 II 期试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 May 21;24(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05046-6.
6
Have a vital end-user been overlooked? Developing a shared decision intervention for patients with potential pancreatic cancer regarding the choice of surgery.是否有重要的终端用户被忽视了?为潜在胰腺癌患者就手术选择制定一项共同决策干预措施。
PEC Innov. 2024 Feb 23;4:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100269. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Involvement of adult children in treatment decision-making for older patients with cancer - a qualitative study of perceptions and experiences of oncology surgeons and nurses.成年子女参与老年癌症患者治疗决策 - 肿瘤外科医生和护士的看法和经验的定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):9203-9210. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07349-z. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
8
Kidney transplantation or dialysis in older adults-an interview study on the decision-making process.老年患者的肾移植或透析治疗——一项关于决策过程的访谈研究。
Age Ageing. 2022 Jun 1;51(6). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac111.
9
Perioperative Optimization of Senior Health (POSH): A Descriptive Analysis of Cancelled Surgery.围手术期老年健康优化(POSH):择期手术取消的描述性分析。
World J Surg. 2021 Jan;45(1):109-115. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05772-z. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
10
Training surgeons in shared decision-making with cancer patients aged 65 years and older: a pilot study.对65岁及以上癌症患者进行共同决策培训的外科医生:一项试点研究。
Cancer Manag Res. 2017 Nov 10;9:591-600. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S147312. eCollection 2017.