• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃肠癌患者实施共同决策的影响因素及策略分析:定性研究的系统评价与Meta分析

Analysis of Influencing Factors and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making Among Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Qualitative Studies.

作者信息

Li Mengnan, Fu Guang, Mo Wenjuan, Yan Yuanyuan, Chen Xi, Li Xiong

机构信息

School of Nursing, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, People's Republic of China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, Hengyang, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17317-6.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17317-6
PMID:40238064
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the past 50 years, doctor-patient interactions have moved from paternalistic to patient-centered, emphasizing shared decision-making (SDM). SDM, which involves healthcare professionals and patients making clinical decisions together, is crucial for patient autonomy and is promoted worldwide, yet remains challenging to implement effectively. Our systematic review analyses the influencing factors of implementing shared decision-making in patients with colorectal cancer and summarizes coping strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (Core library), Ovid, and EBSCO databases was performed from database inception to 1 September 2024 using a combination of subject words and free words. Qualitative studies on the factors affecting SDM for patients with gastrointestinal cancer were identified, the literature quality was evaluated using the Australian JBI Evidence-based Health Care Center quality evaluation standards for qualitative research, and the results were integrated by a pooled integration method.

RESULTS

A total of 37 results were extracted through meta-analysis, summarized into 9 themes, and summarized into 2 subthemes. The results were classified for nonmutually exclusive cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical staff should fully understand patients' needs and preferences for disease and treatment information, strengthen their communication skills regarding SDM, and actively provide effective treatment and care information for patients and their families to promote the implementation of SDM for patients with gastrointestinal tumors.

摘要

背景

在过去50年中,医患互动模式已从家长式转向以患者为中心,强调共同决策(SDM)。共同决策是指医疗专业人员和患者共同做出临床决策,这对患者自主权至关重要,并且在全球范围内得到推广,但有效实施仍具有挑战性。我们的系统评价分析了在结直肠癌患者中实施共同决策的影响因素,并总结应对策略。

材料与方法

从数据库建立至2024年9月1日,使用主题词和自由词相结合的方式,对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、科学网(核心库)、Ovid和EBSCO数据库进行系统检索。识别关于影响胃肠道癌患者共同决策因素的定性研究,采用澳大利亚JBI循证卫生保健中心定性研究质量评价标准对文献质量进行评价,并通过汇总整合方法整合结果。

结果

通过荟萃分析共提取37项结果,归纳为9个主题,并总结为2个子主题。对结果进行分类以处理非互斥情况。

结论

医务人员应充分了解患者对疾病和治疗信息的需求及偏好,加强关于共同决策的沟通技巧,并积极为患者及其家属提供有效的治疗和护理信息,以促进胃肠道肿瘤患者共同决策的实施。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Influencing Factors and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making Among Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Qualitative Studies.胃肠癌患者实施共同决策的影响因素及策略分析:定性研究的系统评价与Meta分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17317-6.
2
Exploring motivations and resistances for implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: A systematic review based on a structure-process-outcome model.探索在临床实践中实施共享决策的动机和阻力:基于结构-过程-结果模型的系统评价。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1254-1268. doi: 10.1111/hex.13541. Epub 2022 Jun 5.
3
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
6
Examining How Technology Supports Shared Decision-Making in Oncology Consultations: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.审视技术如何支持肿瘤学会诊中的共同决策:定性主题分析
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 11;11:e70827. doi: 10.2196/70827.
7
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
8
The experience of shared decision-making for people with asthma: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.哮喘患者共享决策的体验:系统评价和定性研究的荟萃分析。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14039. doi: 10.1111/hex.14039.
9
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
10
Interventions for promoting participation in shared decision-making for children with cancer.促进癌症患儿参与共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 29;11(11):CD008970. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008970.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidisciplinary collaborative enhanced recovery after surgery nursing in patients with colorectal cancer: A comparative study.多学科协作的结直肠癌患者术后加速康复护理:一项比较研究。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Aug 15;17(8):104569. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.104569.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared Decision-Making and Short-Course Radiotherapy for Operable Rectal Adenocarcinoma: A Patient's Right to Choose.可手术直肠腺癌的共享决策和短程放疗:患者的选择权利。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022;49(2):180-183. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000852.
2
Preparing Patients with Early Stage Prostate Cancer to Participate in Clinical Appointments Using a Shared Decision Making Training Video.使用共享决策制定培训视频准备早期前列腺癌患者参加临床预约。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Apr;42(3):364-374. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211028563. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
3
Patient perspectives on treatment decision-making under clinical uncertainty: chemotherapy treatment decisions among stage II colon cancer patients.
患者对临床不确定情况下治疗决策的看法:II 期结肠癌患者的化疗治疗决策。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Oct 23;11(10):1905-1914. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab040.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
Chinese mental health professionals' perceptions of shared decision-making regarding people diagnosed with schizophrenia: A qualitative study.中国精神卫生专业人员对精神分裂症患者共同决策的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Feb;30(1):189-199. doi: 10.1111/inm.12771_1. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
6
Individualized blended care for patients with colorectal cancer: the patient's view on informational support.个体化混合照护对结直肠癌患者的影响:患者对信息支持的看法。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jun;29(6):3061-3067. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05810-5. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
7
Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences.手术中的共同决策:患者和外科医生偏好的范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01211-0.
8
Who decides? Shared decision-making among colorectal cancer surgery patients in China.谁来决定?中国结直肠癌手术患者的共同决策。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Nov;28(11):5353-5361. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05391-3. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
9
Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review.共同决策模型的关键组成部分:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 17;9(12):e031763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031763.
10
Shared Decision Making: Improving Patient Outcomes by Understanding the Benefits of and Barriers to Effective Communication.共同决策:通过了解有效沟通的益处和障碍来改善患者治疗效果
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Oct 1;23(5):540-542. doi: 10.1188/19.CJON.540-542.