• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

十二指肠镜的使用时长与细菌污染风险无关。

Duodenoscope hang time does not correlate with risk of bacterial contamination.

作者信息

Heroux Riley, Sheppard Michelle, Wright Sharon B, Sawhney Mandeep, Hirsch Elizabeth B, Kalaidjian Robin, Snyder Graham M

机构信息

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2017 Apr 1;45(4):360-364. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2016.11.021
PMID:28034537
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current professional guidelines recommend a maximum hang time for reprocessed duodenoscopes of 5-14 days. We sought to study the association between hang time and risk of duodenoscope contamination.

METHODS

We analyzed cultures of the elevator mechanism and working channel collected in a highly standardized fashion just before duodenoscope use. Hang time was calculated as the time from reprocessing to duodenoscope sampling. The relationship between hang time and duodenoscope contamination was estimated using a calculated correlation coefficient between hang time in days and degree of contamination on the elevator mechanism and working channel.

RESULTS

The 18 study duodenoscopes were cultured 531 times, including 465 (87.6%) in the analysis dataset. Hang time ranged from 0.07-39.93 days, including 34 (7.3%) with hang time ≥7.00 days. Twelve cultures (2.6%) demonstrated elevator mechanism and/or working channel contamination. The correlation coefficients for hang time and degree of duodenoscope contamination were very small and not statistically significant (-0.0090 [P = .85] for elevator mechanism and -0.0002 [P = 1.00] for working channel). Odds ratios for hang time (dichotomized at ≥7.00 days) and elevator mechanism and/or working channel contamination were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find a significant association between hang time and risk of duodenoscope contamination. Future guidelines should consider a recommendation of no limit for hang time.

摘要

背景

当前的专业指南建议,重新处理后的十二指肠镜最长悬挂时间为5 - 14天。我们试图研究悬挂时间与十二指肠镜污染风险之间的关联。

方法

我们分析了在十二指肠镜使用前以高度标准化方式采集的升降机构和工作通道的培养物。悬挂时间计算为从重新处理到十二指肠镜采样的时间。使用计算出的以天数表示的悬挂时间与升降机构和工作通道污染程度之间的相关系数,来估计悬挂时间与十二指肠镜污染之间的关系。

结果

18台研究用十二指肠镜共培养了531次,其中465次(87.6%)纳入分析数据集。悬挂时间范围为0.07 - 39.93天,其中34次(7.3%)悬挂时间≥7.00天。12次培养(2.6%)显示升降机构和/或工作通道有污染。悬挂时间与十二指肠镜污染程度的相关系数非常小,且无统计学意义(升降机构为-0.0090 [P = 0.85],工作通道为-0.0002 [P = 1.00])。悬挂时间(以≥7.00天为界进行二分法划分)与升降机构和/或工作通道污染的优势比不显著。

结论

我们未发现悬挂时间与十二指肠镜污染风险之间存在显著关联。未来的指南应考虑建议对悬挂时间不设限制。

相似文献

1
Duodenoscope hang time does not correlate with risk of bacterial contamination.十二指肠镜的使用时长与细菌污染风险无关。
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Apr 1;45(4):360-364. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
2
Randomized Comparison of 3 High-Level Disinfection and Sterilization Procedures for Duodenoscopes.随机比较十二指肠镜的 3 种高水平消毒和灭菌程序。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Oct;153(4):1018-1025. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.052. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
3
Adenosine Triphosphate Quantification Correlates Poorly with Microbial Contamination of Duodenoscopes.三磷酸腺苷定量与十二指肠镜的微生物污染相关性较差。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;38(6):678-684. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.58. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
4
Prospective microbiologic evaluation of the forceps elevator in closed-channel duodenoscopes after reprocessing.再处理后闭合通道十二指肠镜中钳式抬举器的前瞻性微生物学评估
Am J Infect Control. 2017 Feb 1;45(2):121-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
5
Duodenoscope reprocessing surveillance with adenosine triphosphate testing and terminal cultures: a clinical pilot study.使用三磷酸腺苷检测和末端培养物进行十二指肠镜再处理监测:一项临床试点研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1544. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
6
Adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence for bacteriologic surveillance and reprocessing strategies for minimizing risk of infection transmission by duodenoscopes.用于细菌学监测的三磷酸腺苷生物发光法以及十二指肠镜感染传播风险最小化的再处理策略。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1180-1187.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.035. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
7
Independent root-cause analysis of contributing factors, including dismantling of 2 duodenoscopes, to investigate an outbreak of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.独立根因分析致病因素,包括 2 台十二指肠镜的拆卸,以调查一起多重耐药肺炎克雷伯菌暴发事件。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Nov;90(5):793-804. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 15.
8
A randomized trial of single versus double high-level disinfection of duodenoscopes and linear echoendoscopes using standard automated reprocessing.一项使用标准自动化处理对单根和双根十二指肠镜和线性超声内镜行单双高水消毒的随机试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Aug;88(2):306-313.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Duodenoscope Reprocessing Surveillance Methods.前瞻性随机比较十二指肠镜再处理监测方法。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Nov 18;2019:1959141. doi: 10.1155/2019/1959141. eCollection 2019.
10
Implementation of a systematic culturing program to monitor the efficacy of endoscope reprocessing: outcomes and costs.实施系统培养计划以监测内镜再处理效果:结果和成本。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan;87(1):104-109.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Rate and impact of duodenoscope contamination: A systematic review and meta-analysis.十二指肠镜污染的发生率及影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jul 15;25:100451. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100451. eCollection 2020 Aug.
2
High prevalence rate of digestive tract bacteria in duodenoscopes: a nationwide study.十二指肠镜中消化道细菌的高流行率:一项全国性研究。
Gut. 2018 Sep;67(9):1637-1645. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315082. Epub 2018 Apr 10.