Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1544. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
Recent reports of infectious outbreaks linked to duodenoscopes have led to proposals for duodenoscope surveillance culturing, which has inherent limitations. We aimed to assess the feasibility of real-time adenosine triphosphate (ATP) testing after manual cleaning and its ability to predict reprocessing adequacy, as determined by terminal duodenoscope cultures.
Clinically used duodenoscopes underwent reprocessing per current guidelines. After manual cleaning, ATP samples were obtained from the elevator, within the proximal biopsy port, and by flushing of the biopsy channel. After high-level disinfection (HLD), aerobic cultures of the elevator and biopsy channel were obtained using sterile technique. Duodenoscopes with any ATP sample ≥200 relative light units underwent repeated cycles of cleaning, ATP testing, HLD, and terminal culturing.
Twenty clinically used duodenoscopes were included; 18 underwent a second reprocessing cycle, and 6 underwent a third reprocessing cycle because of detection of high ATP. After the initial reprocessing cycle, 12 of 20 (60%) duodenoscopes had positive culture results, most commonly yielding gram-negative bacilli (GNB, n = 11 from 9 duodenoscopes), and catalase-positive gram-positive cocci (CP-GPC, n = 7 from 7 duodenoscopes), suggesting staphylococcal organisms. Ambient environmental controls also showed GNB and CP-GPC growth. The overall sensitivity and specificity of ATP testing compared with terminal cultures were 30% and 53%, respectively.
ATP sampling appears to correlate poorly with terminal culture results and cannot be recommended as a surrogate for terminal cultures. The performance and interpretation of cultures remains complicated by the potential recovery of environmental contaminants.
最近与十二指肠镜相关的感染暴发报告导致了对十二指肠镜监测培养的提议,但这种方法存在固有局限性。我们旨在评估手动清洗后实时三磷酸腺苷(ATP)检测的可行性及其预测再处理充分性的能力,以十二指肠镜终端培养为标准。
临床使用的十二指肠镜按现行指南进行再处理。手动清洗后,从电梯、近端活检口和活检通道冲洗中获得 ATP 样本。高水平消毒(HLD)后,使用无菌技术从电梯和活检通道获得有氧培养物。任何 ATP 样本≥200 相对光单位的十二指肠镜都要进行重复的清洗、ATP 检测、HLD 和终端培养循环。
共纳入 20 台临床使用的十二指肠镜;18 台进行了第二个再处理循环,6 台因检测到高 ATP 而进行了第三个再处理循环。在初始再处理循环后,20 台十二指肠镜中有 12 台(60%)培养结果阳性,最常见的是革兰氏阴性杆菌(11 台来自 9 台十二指肠镜)和过氧化氢阳性革兰氏阳性球菌(7 台来自 7 台十二指肠镜),提示葡萄球菌。环境对照物也显示出革兰氏阴性杆菌和过氧化氢阳性革兰氏阳性球菌的生长。ATP 检测与终端培养相比,其总体敏感性和特异性分别为 30%和 53%。
ATP 采样似乎与终端培养结果相关性较差,不能作为终端培养的替代物。由于环境污染物的潜在回收,培养物的性能和解释仍然很复杂。