• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结石密度变异系数:体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的一种新型预测指标。

Variation Coefficient of Stone Density: A Novel Predictor of the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.

作者信息

Yamashita Shimpei, Kohjimoto Yasuo, Iguchi Takashi, Nishizawa Satoshi, Iba Akinori, Kikkawa Kazuro, Hara Isao

机构信息

Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University , Wakayama, Japan .

出版信息

J Endourol. 2017 Apr;31(4):384-390. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0719. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1089/end.2016.0719
PMID:28052698
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although previous studies have indicated that stone heterogeneity can affect extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) outcomes, there is no established measurement of stone heterogeneity on CT imagery. We investigated whether variation coefficient of stone density (VCSD) can predict shockwave success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 245 patients with urinary calculi who had undergone SWL. We compared the predictive powers of treatment success between VCSD and other parameters associated with CT attenuation. In addition, we performed logistic regression analysis to identify the factors contributing to treatment success. Treatment success was determined within 3 months after first treatment using noncontrast CT.

RESULTS

The treatment success rate was 47.8% (117/245 cases). From receiver operating characteristic curves for treatment success, area under curve of VCSD (0.7181) was larger than that of mean stone density (MSD) (0.6384, p = 0.09) and standard deviation of stone density (0.5412, p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that MSD (p = 0.028) and VCSD (p < 0.001) independently predicted the outcome. Categorized by stone location, VCSD was the independent significant predictor for SWL outcomes in both kidney (p = 0.047) and ureteral calculi (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that VCSD can be a novel predictor of SWL success. The development of nomograms or scoring systems, including VCSD, can assist in the decision process for patients and minimize unnecessary delay in treatment of urolithiasis.

摘要

目的

尽管先前的研究表明结石异质性会影响体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)的效果,但在CT图像上尚无确定的结石异质性测量方法。我们研究了结石密度变异系数(VCSD)是否能预测冲击波治疗的成功率。

材料与方法

我们对245例行SWL的尿石症患者进行了回顾性研究。我们比较了VCSD与其他CT衰减相关参数对治疗成功的预测能力。此外,我们进行了逻辑回归分析以确定促成治疗成功的因素。首次治疗后3个月内使用非增强CT确定治疗是否成功。

结果

治疗成功率为47.8%(117/245例)。从治疗成功的受试者工作特征曲线来看,VCSD的曲线下面积(0.7181)大于平均结石密度(MSD)的曲线下面积(0.6384,p = 0.09)和结石密度标准差的曲线下面积(0.5412,p < 0.01)。多变量分析显示,MSD(p = 0.028)和VCSD(p < 0.001)独立预测治疗结果。按结石位置分类,VCSD是肾(p = 0.047)和输尿管结石(p < 0.001)SWL结果的独立显著预测因素。

结论

我们发现VCSD可以成为SWL成功的一种新的预测指标。开发包括VCSD的列线图或评分系统,可以辅助患者的决策过程,并尽量减少尿石症治疗中不必要的延误。

相似文献

1
Variation Coefficient of Stone Density: A Novel Predictor of the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.结石密度变异系数:体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的一种新型预测指标。
J Endourol. 2017 Apr;31(4):384-390. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0719. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
2
A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.高分辨率CT参数预测上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石术成功率的前瞻性评估
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1227-1232. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0364. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
3
External Validation and Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of the Triple D Score to Predict Stone-Free Status After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术后预测结石清除状态的三联D评分的可靠性和有效性的外部验证与评估
J Endourol. 2017 Feb;31(2):169-173. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0721. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
4
Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.CT-Calculometry(CT-CM)的高级非对比计算机断层扫描后处理优于已建立的冲击波碎石术结果预测指标。
World J Urol. 2018 Dec;36(12):2073-2080. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2348-x. Epub 2018 May 29.
5
A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.一种用于预测儿童冲击波碎石术治疗结果的新列线图。
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):84.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
6
External Validation of Triple D Score in an Elderly (≥65 Years) Population for Prediction of Success Following Shockwave Lithotripsy.三联D评分在老年(≥65岁)人群中用于预测冲击波碎石术后成功率的外部验证
J Endourol. 2016 Sep;30(9):1009-16. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0328. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
7
Do we really need kidneys-ureters-bladder radiography to predict stone radiopacity before treatment with shockwave lithotripsy? Development and internal validation of a novel predictive model based on computed tomography parameters.在进行冲击波碎石治疗之前,我们真的需要进行肾脏-输尿管-膀胱造影来预测结石的不透X线性吗?基于计算机断层扫描参数的新型预测模型的开发与内部验证。
J Endourol. 2015 May;29(5):498-503. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0190.ECC.
8
Noncontrast computed tomography can predict the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy via accurate stone measurement and abdominal fat distribution determination.非增强计算机断层扫描可通过精确的结石测量和腹部脂肪分布测定来预测冲击波碎石术的结果。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015 Jan;31(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.评估平均结石密度和皮肤至结石距离在预测肾和输尿管结石冲击波碎石术成功率中的重要性。
Urol Res. 2010 Aug;38(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
10
Computed Tomography-Based Novel Prediction Model for the Outcome of Shockwave Lithotripsy in Proximal Ureteral Stones.基于计算机断层扫描的近端输尿管结石冲击波碎石术预后新型预测模型
J Endourol. 2016 Jul;30(7):810-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0056. Epub 2016 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of variation coefficient of stone density in determining success of shock wave lithotripsy in urinary calculi.结石密度变异系数在判定尿路结石冲击波碎石术成功率中的作用。
World J Nephrol. 2025 Mar 25;14(1):96946. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i1.96946.
2
Clinical outcomes of intravenous urography-assisted shockwave lithotripsy for radiolucent ureteral stones.静脉尿路造影辅助冲击波碎石术治疗透X线输尿管结石的临床疗效
Asian J Urol. 2025 Jan;12(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2024.03.002. Epub 2024 May 11.
3
CT-based deep learning model for predicting the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in treating ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.
基于 CT 的深度学习模型预测体外冲击波碎石术治疗大于 1cm 的输尿管结石的成功率。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Nov 5;52(1):157. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01656-2.
4
CT-based radiomics for predicting success of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.基于 CT 的放射组学预测大于 1 厘米的输尿管结石冲击波碎石术的成功率。
World J Urol. 2024 Jul 10;42(1):397. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05111-0.
5
Variation coefficient of stone density and renal cortical thickness: the parameters evaluating non-contrast computed tomography imaging for predict extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success.结石密度和肾皮质厚度的变异系数:评估非增强 CT 成像预测体外冲击波碎石术成功的参数。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 2;52(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01561-8.
6
AI prediction of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for ureteral stones by machine learning-based analysis with a variety of stone and patient characteristics.基于机器学习的多种结石和患者特征分析对体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的效果进行 AI 预测。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Dec 2;52(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01506-7.
7
A Prospective Study on the Impact of Clinical Factors and Adjusted Triple D System for Success Rate of ESWL.一项关于临床因素和调整后的三重 D 系统对 ESWL 成功率影响的前瞻性研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 13;59(10):1827. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101827.
8
Development and validation of a predictive model for stone-free failure after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stone in a large prospective cohort.一项针对大型前瞻性队列中输尿管结石患者体外冲击波碎石术后无结石失败的预测模型的开发与验证
World J Urol. 2023 May;41(5):1431-1436. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04358-3. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
9
A New Parameter for Calcium Oxalate Stones: Impact of Linear Calculus Density on Non-Contrast Computed Tomography.一种新的草酸钙结石参数:线性微积分密度对非增强 CT 的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 30;59(2):267. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020267.
10
The impact of Hounsfield unit-related variables on percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes.HU 相关变量对经皮肾镜取石术结果的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 2;12(1):18451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23383-7.